Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Effects of natural antimicrobials on bacterial cell hydrophobicity, adhesion, and zeta potential / Vpliv naravnih protimikrobnih snovi na bakterijsko hidrofobnost, adhezijo in zeta potencial

Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Volume 67 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2016

References

  1. 1. Jefferson KK. What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004;236:163-73. doi: 10.1016/j. femsle.2004.06.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Chmielewski AN, Frank JF. Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Safety 2003;2:22-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003. tb00012.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Bae YM, Baek SY, Lee SY. Resistance of pathogenic bacteria on the surfaces of stainless steel depending on attachment form and efficacy of chemical sanitizers. Int J Food Microbiol 2012;153:465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.01710.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.01722225983
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Giaouris E, Chorianopoulos N, Nychas GJE. Effect of temperature, pH, and water activity on biofilm formation Salmonella enteritidis PT4 on stainless steel surfaces as indicated by the bead vortexing method and conductance measurements. J Food Protection 2005;68:2149-54. PMID: 1624572210.4315/0362-028X-68.10.2149
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Monds RD, O’Toole GA. The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Trends Microbiol 2009;17:73-87. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008. 11.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 6. Barnes LM, Lo MF, Adams MR, Chamberlain AHL. Effect of milk proteins on adhesion of bacteria to stainless steel surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65:4543-8. PMID: 1050808710.1128/AEM.65.10.4543-4548.19999160510508087
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 7. Goulter RM, Gentle IR, Dykes GA. Issues in determining factors influencing bacterial attachment: a review using the attachment of Escherichia coli to abiotic surfaces as an example. Lett Appl Microbiol 2009;49:1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02591.x10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02591.x19291206
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 8. Boks NP, Norde W, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Forces involved in bacterial adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. Microbiology 2008;154:3122-33. doi: 10.1099/ mic.0.2008/018622-010.1099/mic.0.2008/018622-018832318
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 9. Simões M, Simões LC, Vieira MJ. A review of current emergent biofilm control strategies. LWT- Food Sci Technol 2010;43:573-83. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.00810.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 10. Abreu AC, Borges A, Mergulhão F, Simões F. Use of phenyl isothiocyanate for biofilm prevention and control. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2014;86:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j. ibiod.2013.03.024
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. 11. Lemos M, Borges A, Teodósio J, Araújo P, Mergulhão F, Melo L, Simões M. The effects of ferulic and salicylic acids on Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens single- and dual-species biofilms. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2014;86:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.01110.1016/j.ibiod.2013.06.011
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 12. Klančnik A, Smole Možina S, Zhang Q. Anti-Campylobacter activities and resistance mechanisms of natural phenolic compounds in Campylobacter. PLoS ONE 2012;7(12):e51800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.005180010.1371/journal.pone.0051800352409123284770
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 13. ISO 4833:1991. Microbiology - General guidance for the enumeration of micro-organisms - Colony count technique at 30 degrees C. Genva: International Organization for Standardization; 1991.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 14. Rosenberg M. Bacterial adherence to hydrocarbon: a useful technique for studying cell surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1984;22:289-95. doi: 10.1111/ j.1574-6968.1984.tb00743.x10.1111/j.1574-6968.1984.tb00743.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 15. Tahmourespour A, Kermanshahi RK, Salehi R, Nabinejad A. The relationship between cell surface hydrophobicity and antibiotic resistance of streptococcal strains isolated from dental plaque and caries. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2008;10:251-5.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 16. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, Beachey EH. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 1985;22:996-1006. PMID: 390585510.1128/jcm.22.6.996-1006.19852718663905855
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 17. Harvey J, Keenan KP, Gilmour A. Assessing biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes strains. Food Microbiol 2007;24:380-92. PMID: 1718976410.1016/j.fm.2006.06.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 18. Lage OM, Bondoso J, Catita JAM. Determinationof zeta potential in Planctomycetes and its application in heavy metal toxicity assessment. Arch Microbiol 2012;194:847-55. doi: 10.1007/s00203-012-0818-x10.1007/s00203-012-0818-x
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 19. Heimez PC, Rajagopalan R. Principles of Colloid and Surface Chemistry. 3rd edition. New York (NY): CRC Press; 1997.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 20. Bohinc K, Dražič G, Fink R, Oder M, Jevšnik M, Nipič D, Godič-Torkar K, Raspor P. Available surface dictates microbial adhesion capacity. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014;50:265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.02710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.027
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 21. Jadhav S, Shah R, Bhave M, Palombo EA. Inhibitory activity of yarrow essential oil on Listeria planktonic cells and biofilms. Food Control 2013;29:125-30. doi: 10.1016/j. foodcont.2012.05.071
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 22. Biazzar E, Heidani M, Asefnezhad A, Montazeri A. The relationship between cellular adhesion and surface roughness in polystyrene modified by microwave plasma radiation. Int J Nanomedicine 2011; 6:631-9. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S1721810.2147/IJN.S17218
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 23. Martin MA, Pfaller MA, Massanari RM, Wenzel RP. Use of cellular hydrophobicity, slime production, and species identification markers for the clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates. Am J Infect Control 1989;17:130-5. PMID: 274219810.1016/0196-6553(89)90199-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. 24. Schneider PF, RileyTV. Cell-surface hydrophobicity of Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Epidemiol Infect 1991;106:71-5. PMID: 199345410.1017/S095026880005645422718551993454
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 25. Reisner K, Krogfelt KA, Klein BM, Zechner EL, Molin S. In vitro biofilm formation of commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli strains: impact of environmental and genetic factors. J Bacteriol 2006;188:3572-81. doi: 10.1128/ JB.188.10.3572-3581.200610.1128/JB.188.10.3572-3581.2006148284916672611
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. 26. Rode TM, Langsrud S, Holck A. Møretrø T. Different patterns of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus under foodrelated stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 2007;116:372-3. PMID: 1740879210.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.02.01717408792
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 27. Kalaichelvam K, Chai LC, Thong KL. Variations in motility and biofilm formation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Gut Pathogens 2014;6:2-5. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-6-210.1186/1757-4749-6-2392211324499680
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 28. Rivas L, Fegan N, Dykes GA. Physicochemical properties of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli. J Appl Microbiol 2005;99:716-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02688.x10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02688.x16162222
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 29. Nwanyanwu CE, Abu GO. Influence of growth media on hydrphobicity of phenol-utilizing bacteria found in petroleum refinery effluent. Int Res J Biol Sci 2013;2:6-11.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 30. Soni KA, Balasubramanian AK, Beskok A, Pillai SD. Zeta potential of selected bacteria in drinking water when dead, starved, or exposed to minimal and rich culture media. Curr Microbiol 2008;56:93-7. doi: 10.1007/s00284-007-9046-z10.1007/s00284-007-9046-z17985185
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 31. Bohinc K, Dražič G, Abram A, Jevšnik M, Jeršek B, Nipič D, Kurinčič M, Raspor P. Metal surface characteristics dictate bacterial adhesion capacity. Int J Adhes Adhes 2016;68:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.01.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.01.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 32. Preedy E, Perni S, Nipič D, Bohinc K, Prokopovich P. Surface roughness mediated adhesion forces between borosilicate glass and gram-positive bacteria. Langmuir 2014;30:9466-76. doi: 10.1021/la501711t10.1021/la501711t25019516
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/aiht-2016-67-2720 | Journal eISSN: 1848-6312 | Journal ISSN: 0004-1254
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Croatian, Slovenian
Page range: 39 - 45
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2015
Accepted on: Mar 1, 2016
Published on: Apr 15, 2016
Published by: Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
epigallocatechin gallate,
ferulic acid,
polystyrene,
rosmarinic acid
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Basic medical science,
Basic medical science, other

© 2016 Marija Kurinčič, Barbara Jeršek, Anja Klančnik, Sonja Smole Možina, Rok Fink, Goran Dražić, Peter Raspor, Klemen Bohinc, published by Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 67 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)Next article