Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of acrylamide toxicity using a battery of standardised bioassays / Procjena toksičnosti akrilamida pomoću standardiziranih biotestova Cover

Assessment of acrylamide toxicity using a battery of standardised bioassays / Procjena toksičnosti akrilamida pomoću standardiziranih biotestova

Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Volume 66 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2015
References

References

  1. 1. European Chemicals Bureau. European Union Risk Assessment Report (EURAR): Acrylamide. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Smith EA, Oeheme FW. Acrylamide and polyacrylamide: A review of production, use, environmental fate and neurotoxicity. Rev Environ Health 1991;9:215-28. PMID: 1668792
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Bologna LS, Andrawes FF, Barvenik FW, Lentz RD, Sojka RE. Analysis of residual acrylamide in field crops. J Chromatogr Sci 1999;37:241-4. doi: 10.1093/ chromsci/37.7.240
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Hashimoto K. The toxicity of acrylamide. Sangyo Igaku 1980;22:233-48. doi: 10.1539/joh1959.22.233
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. World Health Organization (WHO). International Programme on Chemical Safety - Environmental Health Criteria 49: Acrylamide. Geneva: WHO; 1985.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans. Some Industrial Chemicals, Vol. 60.Lyon: IARC, 1994.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Council of the European Union. Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Off J Eur Comm 1998, L 330/32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. World Health Organization (WHO). Acrylamide in Drinkingwater: Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Backe WJ, Yingling V, Johnson T. The determination of acrylamide in environmental and drinking waters by largevolume injection - hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2014;1334:72-8. doi: 10.1016/j. chroma.2014.02.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Weideborg M, Källqvist T, Ødegård, KE, Sverdrup LE, Vik EA. Environmental risk assessment of acrylamide and methylacrylamide from a grouting agent used in the tunnel construction of Romeriksporten, Norway. Water Res 2001;35:2645-52. PMID: 11456163
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. DeArmond PD, DiGoregorio AL. Characterization of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of acrylamide in complex environmental samples. Analyt Bioanal Chem 2013;405:4159-66. doi: 10.1007/s00216-013-6822-4
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of European the Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (Text with EEA relevance). Off J Eur Comm 2008, L 353/1.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of European the Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/ EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (Text with EEA relevance). Off J Eur Comm 2006, L 396.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.Sixty-fourth meeting 8-17 February 2005, Rome, Italy [displayed 26 November 2015]. Available at http://www.panelamonitor.org/media/docrepo/document/files/joint-faowho-expert-committe-of-food-additives-sixty-fourthmeeting-rome-8-17-february-2005.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Bull RJ, Robinson M, Laurie RD, Stoner GD, Greisiger E, Meier RJ, Stober J. Carcinogenic effects of acrylamide in Sencar and A/J mice. Cancer Res 1984;44:107-11. PMID: 636034
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Rice JM. The carcinogenicity of acrylamide. Mutat Res 2005;580:3-20. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.09.008
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Costa LC, Calleman CJ. Determination of Hemoglobin Adducts Following Acrylamide Exposure. Washington (DC): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1994.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Repetto G, Jos A, Hazen MJ, Molero ML, del Peso A, Salguero M, del Castillo P, Rodrı́guez-Vicente MC, Repetto M. A test battery for the ecotoxicological evaluation of pentachlorophenol. Toxicol in Vitro 2001;15:503-9. doi: 10.1016/S0887-2333(01)00055-8
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Pandard P, Devillers J, Charissou AM, Poulsen V, Jourdain MJ, Férard JF, Grand C, Bispo A. Selecting a battery of bioassays for ecotoxicological characterization of wastes.Sci Total Environ 2006;363:114-25. doi: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2005.12.016
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. European Commission. International Uniform Chemical Information Database (IUCLID) - Existing Chemicals [CD version 1.0]. Ispra (IT): European Chemical Bureau, European Commission - JRC Environmental Institute, 1996.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. EG&G Bionomics. Acute Toxicity of Acrylamide to Mysid Shrimp (Mysidopsis bahia) (Report BP-83-5-58-R).Pensacola (FL): EG&G Bionomics Marine Research Laboratory; 1986.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. 22. ABC Laboratories. Test Report 29736: Dynamic 96 hour acute toxicity of acrylamide monomer to bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Columbia (MO): ABC Labs; 1982.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Krautter GR, Mast RW, Alexander HC, Wolf CH, Friedman MA, Koschier FJ, Thompson CM. Acute aquatic toxicity tests with acrylamide monomer and macroinvertebrates and fish. Environ Toxicol Chem 1986;5:373-7. doi: 10.1002/ etc.5620050406
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Shaw JR, Pfrender ME, Eads BD, Klaper R, Callaghan A, Sibly RM, Colson I, Jansen B, Gilbert D, Colbourne JK.Daphnia as an emerging model for toxicological genomics.Adv Exp Biol 2008;2:165-219. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2423(08)00005-7
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Nauman B, Eberius M, Appenroth KJ. Growth rate based dose-response relationships and EC-values of ten heavy metals using the duckweed growth inhibition test (ISO 20079) with Lemna minor L. clone St. J Plant Physiol 2007;164:1656-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.10.011
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Wolska L, Sagajdakow A, Kuczyńka A, Namieśnik J.Application of ecotoxicological studies in integrated environmental monitoring: possibilities and problems. Trend Anal Chem 2007;26:332-4. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2006.11.012
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 8692:2012 Water quality - Freshwater algal growth inhibition test with unicellular green algae. Geneva: ISO;2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 20079:2005 Water quality - Determination of the toxic effect of water constituents and waste water on duckweed (Lemna minor) - Duckweed growth inhibition test. Geneva: ISO;2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 6341:2012 Water quality - Determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea) - Acute toxicity test. Geneva: ISO; 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. 30. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO/ TC 147/SC 5/WG N 182, Nomenclature Selenastrum capricornutum. Geneva: ISO; 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Hegewald E. New combinations in the genus Desmodesmus (Chlorophyceae, Scenedesmaceae). Arch Hydrobiol 2000;96(Suppl 131):1-18.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Krajnčič B, Devidé Z. Report on photoperiodic responses in Lemnaceae from Slovenia. Berichte des Geobot Inst ETH Stiftung Rübel (Zürich) 1980;47:75-86. doi: 10.5169/ seals-377701
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Pirson A, Seidel F. Zell- und stoffwechselphysiologische Untersuchungen an der Wurzel von Lemna minor unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Kalium- und Calciummangel [Cell metabolism and physiology in Lemna minor root deprived of potassium and calcium, in German].Planta 1950;38:431-73.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Isidori M, Parella A, Piazza CML, Strada R. Toxicity screening of surface waters in southern Italy and Toxkit microbiotests. In: Persoone G, Janssen C, De Coen W, editors. New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring. New York (NY): Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers; 2000. p. 289-93.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Michel A, Johnson RD, Duke SO, Scheffler BE. Doseresponse relationships between herbicides with different modes of action and growth of Lemna paucicostata: an improved ecotoxicological method. Environ Toxicol Chem 2004;23:1074-9. doi: 10.1897/03-256
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Wayers A, Sokull-Klüttgen B, Baraibar-Fentanes J, Vollumer G. Acute toxicity data: a comprehensive comparision of results on fish, daphnia and algae tests with new substances notified in the European Union. Environ Toxicol Chem 2000;19:1931-3. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620190731
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Eberius M, Mennicken G, Reuter I, Vendenhirtz J. Sensitivity of different growth inhibition tests - just a question of mathematical calculation? Ecotoxicology 2002;11:293-7. doi: 10.1023/A:1020536702081
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Blinova I. Use of freshwater algae and duckweeds for phytotoxicity testing. Environ Toxicol 2004;19:425-8. doi: 10.1002/tox.20042
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. 39. den Besten PJ, Munawar M. Ecotoxicological Testing of Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems: Emerging Techniques, Trends and Strategies (Ecovision World Monograph). New York (NY): Taylor & Francis Inc.; 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Société d’Étude des Pays du Commonwealth (SEPC).Inhibition test (72 hours) in freshwater unicellular algae Selenastrum capricornutum - Company report 104. Paris: SEPC; 1997.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2 - Effects on Biotic Systems. Paris: OECD, 2011. doi: 10.1787/20745761
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. 42. The Commission of the European Communities. Commission Directive 92/69/EEC of 31 July 1992 adapting to technical progress for the seventeenth time Council Directive 67/548/ EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Off J Eur Comm 1992, L 383.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Wang W. Literature review on duckweed toxicity testing.Environ Res 1990;52:7-22. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80147-1
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. 44. van Steveninck RFM, van Steveninck ME, Fernando DR. Heavy-metal (Zn, Cd) tolerance in selected clones of duckweed (Lemna minor). Plant Soil 1992;146:271-80. doi: 10.1007/BF00012021
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. 45. Prasad MNV, Malec P, Waloszek A, Bojko M, Strzałka K. Physiological responses of Lemna trisulca L. (duckweed) to cadmium and copper bioaccumulation. Plant Sci 2001;161:881-9. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00478-2
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. 46. Hou W, Chen X, Song G, Wang Q, Chang CC. Effects of copper and cadmium on heavy metal polluted waterbody restoration by duckweed (Lemna minor). Plant Physiol Biochem 2007;45:62-9. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.12.005
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. 47. ABC Laboratories. Test Report 29736: Dynamic 96 hour acute toxicity to acrylamide monomer to water fleas (Daphnia magna). Columbia (MO): ABC Labs; 1983.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 48. Takahashi T, Yoshii M, Kawano T, Kosaka T, Hosoya H. A new approach for the assessment of acrylamide toxicity using a green paramecium. Toxicol in Vitro 2005;19:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2004.06.012
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/aiht-2015-66-2715 | Journal eISSN: 1848-6312 (formerly 0004-1254) | Journal ISSN: 0004-1254
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Croatian, Slovenian
Page range: 315 - 321
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2015
Accepted on: Dec 1, 2015
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
battery of bioassays,
Daphnia magna,
Desmodesmus subspicatus,
ISO standards,
Lemna minor,
polyacrylamide,
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Basic medical science,
Basic medical science, other

© 2015 Mira Zovko, Željka Vidaković-Cifrek, Želimira Cvetković, Jasna Bošnir, Sandra Šikić, published by Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 66 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Previous article