Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Inspection of Gas Pipelines Using Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology Cover

Inspection of Gas Pipelines Using Magnetic Flux Leakage Technology

By: Z. Usarek and  K. Warnke  
Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. 1. Ahmad, Z., Principles of corrosion engineering and corrosion control. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006.10.1016/B978-075065924-6/50004-0
  2. 2. Porter P.C., Use of magnetic flux leakage (MFL) for the inspection of pipelines and storage tanks. Proc. SPIE 2454, Nondestructive Evaluation of Aging Utilities (1995), 172–184.10.1117/12.209361
  3. 3. Bubenik T.A., Nestleroth J.B., Eiber R.J., and Saffell B.F., Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) technology for natural gas pipeline inspection. Topical report, November 1992.
  4. 4. Sutherland J. and Paz H., Advances in in-line inspection technology for pipeline integrity. 5th Annual International Pipeline Congress, Morelia, Mexico, 2000.
  5. 5. Park G.S., Park S.H., Analysis of the velocity-induced eddy current in MFL type NDT. IEEE Trans. Magn. 40 (2004), 663–666.
  6. 6. Afzal M., Udpa S., Advanced signal processing of magnetic flux leakage data obtained from seamless gas pipeline. NDT&E Int. 35 (2002), 449-457.
  7. 7. Piotrowski L., Chmielewski M., Analysis of the magnetic flux leakage signal detected by a pipeline inspection gauge with the help of the continuous wavelet transform. Journal of Electrical Engineering 66 (2015), 182-185.
  8. 8. Carvalho A.A., Rebello J.M.A., Sagrilo L.V.S., Camerini C.S., and Miranda I.V.J., MFL signals and artificial neural networks applied to detection and classification of pipe weld defects. NDT&E Int. 36 (2006), 661-667.
  9. 9. Usarek Z., Influence of sample geometry, magnetic properties and a method of magnetisation on the spatial distribution of the stray magnetic field.. PhD dissertation (in Polish), Gdańsk University of Technology, 2017.
  10. 10. Mandayam S., Udpa L., Udpa S.S., and Lord W., Signal processing for in-line inspection of gas transmission pipelines. Res. Nondestruct. Eval. 8 (1996), 233–247.
  11. 11. Lei L., Wang C., Ji F., and Wang Q., RBF-based compensation of velocity effects on MFL signals. Insight 51 (2009), 508–511.
  12. 12. Lu S., Feng J., Li F., and Liu J., Precise Inversion for the Reconstruction of Arbitrary Defect Profiles Considering Velocity Effect in Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing. IEEE Trans. Magn. 53 (2017), 1–12.
  13. 13. Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines, Supplement to ASME B31 Code for Pressure Piping. An American National Standard – ASME B31G-2012.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/adms-2017-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2083-4799 | Journal ISSN: 1730-2439
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 45
Published on: Oct 25, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Z. Usarek, K. Warnke, published by Gdansk University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.