Optimal design of a composite propellant formulation using response surface methodology

Hamed, J. O.; Ogunleye, O. O.; Osheku, C. A.

doi:10.1515/adms-2017-0004

Abstract

There is a continuous demand for high performance composite propellant formulations to meet mission requirements. The performance of composite propellant formulations can be enhanced by optimizing propellant formulation. However, the main objective of this study is to formulate a composition for composite propellant by optimizing the specific impulse which is the measure of propellant performance. A central composite design (ccd) consisting five ingredients (ammonium nitrate, powdered aluminum, polyester resin, ammonium dichromate and powdered charcoal) at five levels was used to formulate optimum propellant formulation from composite materials of ammonium nitrate based propellant verified for propellant characteristics using propellant performance evaluation programme (propep 3). The responses evaluated are specific impulse, characteristic velocity, density, temperature and molecular weight. Response surface methodology was used to analyze the results of the ccd of the composite formulations. The optimum values for specific impulse, characteristic velocity, density, temperature and molecular weight of the mixture from the surface plot are 212.178 s, 1335.81 m/s, 1640.6 k g/m3, 1968.73 k and 21.7722 g/mol respectively. The optimum predicted specific impulse was 212.178 s at composite composition of 73.61% ammonium nitrate, 4.36% powdered aluminum, 14.39% polyester resin, 5.10% ammonium dichromate and 2.54% powdered charcoal. The propellant optimum composition validated with propep 3 are in good agreement with each other in their accompany propellant characteristics. Therefore, the optimal propellant formulation enhanced the performance of solid propellants.

References

1. Fitzgerald R. P., Brewster M. Q., Journal of Combustion and Flame, 154 (2008), 660-670p.10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.04.026
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Carro R. et al., Proceeding of 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit Tucson, Arizona (2005).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Brown C. D., Spacecraft Propulsion, AIAA, Washington (1995).10.2514/4.862441
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Sutton G. P., Biblarz O., Rocket Propulsion Elements, John Wiley & Sons, 7th ed., New York (2001).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Catherine K. B., et al., Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 59 (2000), 93-100.10.1023/A:1010127727162
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Yang R., An H., Tan H., Combustion and Thermal Decomposition of HNIW and HTPB/HNIW Propellants with Additives, Combustion and Flame, 135 (2003), 463-473.10.1016/j.combustflame.2003.08.008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Singh S., Raina C. S., Bawa A. S., Sexena D. C., Sweet potato-based pasta product: optimization of ingredient levels using response surface methodology, International Journal of Food Science and Technology 38 (2003). 1-10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Langlet A., Wingborg N., Ostmark H., A New High Performance Oxidizer for Solid Propellants, International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion, 4 (1997), 1-6.10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.v4.i1-6.580
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Schoyer H. F. R., Schnork A. J., Korting P. A. O. G., van Lit P. J. First Experimental Results of an HNF/Al/GAP Solid Propellant, AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, T. L. 33rd, Seattle, WA, (1997) 6-9.10.2514/6.1997-3131
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10.Couturier R., Advanced Energetic Binder Propellants, Solid Rocket Propulsion Technology, A. Davenas, Ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, (1993) 510-511.10.1016/B978-0-08-040999-3.50016-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11.Boyars C., Klager K., Propellants, Manufacturing, Hazards and Testing, American Chemical Society, Washington D.C, 88 (1969).10.1021/ba-1969-0088
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12.Muthiah R. M., Varghese Rao S. S., Ninan K. N., Krishnamurthy V. N., Realization of an Eco-friendly Solid Propellant Based on HTPB-HMX-AP System for Launch Vehicle Applications, International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion, 4 (1997), 1-6.10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.v4.i1-6.150
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13.Hartfield R., Jenkins R., Burkhalter J., Foster W., A Review of Analytical Methods for Solid Rocket Motor Grain Analysis, AIAA (2003) 2003-4506.10.2514/6.2003-4506
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14.Montgomery D. C., Design and Analysis of Experiments: Response Surface Method and Designs, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc (2005).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15.Ogunleye O. O., Hamed J. O., Alagbe S. O., Optimization of Potassium Nitrate Based Solid Propellant Grains Design Using Response Surface Methodology, Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 9, No. 27 (2015), 123 - 134.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16.Sutton G. P., Rocket Propulsion Elements, John Wiley & Sons, MIT, 6th ed., New York (1992).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17.Bluestone S., et al., Proceedings of 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit Nashville, TN (2010).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18.Cai W.D., Thakre P., Yang V., Model of AP/HTPB composite propellant combustion in rocket motor environments, Combust. Sci. Tech., 180 (2008), 2143-2169.10.1080/00102200802414915
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19.Yang V., Brill T., Ren W. Z., Solid-Propellant Chemistry, Combustion, and Motor Interior Ballistics, Progress Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, 185 (2000), 990.10.2514/4.866562
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20.Beckstead M. W., Puduppakkam K., Thakre P., Yang V., Modeling of combustion and ignition of solid-propellant ingredients, Programme Energy Combustion Science, 33 (6) (2007), 497-551.10.1016/j.pecs.2007.02.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21.Krishnan S., Rajesh K. K., Proceedings of 37th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE, Joint Propulsion Committee Conference and Exhibit Salt Lake City, Utah (2001).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22.Jayaraman K., et al., Combustion and Flame, 156 (2009), 1662-1673.10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.03.014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23.Yildirim C., Analysis of Grain Burn back and Internal Flow In Solid Propellant Rocket Motors in 3- Dimensions, Ph. D. Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, METU, (2007), 110-118.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Optimal design of a composite propellant formulation using response surface methodology

Abstract

Paradigm

My account