Dáil reforms since 2011: Pathway to power for the ‘puny’ parliament?

Lynch, Catherine; O’Malley, Eoin; Reidy, Theresa; Farrell, David M.; Suiter, Jane

doi:10.1515/admin-2017-0014

Abstract

We know that the Dáil is dominated by the government. From 2010 to 2016 there was a clamour for change, which ultimately led to significant reforms of the Oireachtas, and specifically the Dáil. In this article we show that the basis for the weakness of the Dáil was the government’s control of the legislative agenda. This article tracks the changes that were made, and we make an early assessment of them. However, firm conclusions are difficult to draw because of the extent to which the strengthening of the Dáil is a function of the weak position of the current minority government.

References

Caffrey, R. (2010). Procedure in the Dail. In M. MacCarthaigh & M. Manning (Eds), The Houses of the Oireachtas: Parliament in Ireland (pp. 257-84). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chubb, B. (1992). The government and politics of Ireland (3rd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Costello, R., O’Neill, P., & Thomson, R. (2016). The fulfilment of election pledges by the outgoing governments. In M. Gallagher & M. Marsh (Eds), How Ireland voted 2016: The election that nobody won. London: Palgrave.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cox, G. C., & McCubbins, M. D. (1997). Toward a theory of legislative rules changes: Assessing Schickler and Rich’s evidence. American Journal of Political Science, 41 (4), 1,376-86.10.2307/2960493
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cox, G. C., & McCubbins, M. D. (2005). Setting the agenda: Responsible party government in the US House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791123
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Diermeier, D., Prato, C., & Vlaicu, R. (2015). Procedural change in majoritarian organizations. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (4), 866-79.10.1111/ajps.12142
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Diermeier, D., & Vlaicu, R. (2011). Parties, coalitions and the internal organization of legislatures. American Political Science Review, 105 (2), 359-80.10.1017/S0003055411000104
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Döring, H. (Ed.) (1995). Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe. NYC: St Martin’s Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Farrell, D., & Suiter, J. (2016). The election in context. In M. Gallagher & M. Marsh (Eds), How Ireland voted 2016: The election that nobody won. London: Palgrave.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garritzmann, J. L. (2017). How much power do oppositions have? Comparing the opportunity structures of parliamentary oppositions in 21 democracies. Journal of Legislative Studies, 23, 1-30.10.1080/13572334.2017.1283913
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hug, S. (2010). Selection effects in roll call votes. British Journal of Political Science, 46 (3), 263-77.10.1017/S0007123409990160
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hug, S., Wegmann, S., & Wuest, R. (2015). Parliamentary voting procedures in comparison. West European Politics, 38 (5), 940-68.10.1080/01402382.2015.1045290
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koss, M. (2015). The origins of parliamentary agenda control: A comparative process tracing analysis. West European Politics, 38 (5), 1,062-85.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krehbiel, K. (1992). Information and legislative organization. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krehbiel, K. (2004). Legislative organisations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 113-28.10.1257/089533004773563467
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacCarthaigh, M., & Manning, M. (Eds) (2010). The Houses of the Oireachtas: Parliament in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McGee, H. (2010). Chief Whip admits government performance on Dáil reforms deplorable. The Irish Times.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Müller, W. C., & Sieberer, U. (2014). Procedure and rules in legislatures. In S. Martin, T. Saalfeld & K. Strøm (Eds), The Oxford handbook of legislative studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Malley, E. (2011). Permanent revolution: A political system capable of renewal. In E. Burke & R. Lyons (Eds), Next generation Ireland. Dublin: Blackhall Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Malley, E. (2016). 70 Days: Government formation in 2016. In M. Gallagher & M. Marsh (Eds), How Ireland voted 2016: The election that nobody won. London: Palgrave.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Malley, E., & S. Martin. (2017). The government and the Taoiseach. In J. Coakley & M. Gallagher (Eds), Politics in the Republic of Ireland (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rasch, B. E. (2014). Institutional foundations of legislative agenda-setting. In S. Martin, T. Saalfeld & K. Strøm (Eds), The Oxford handbook of legislative studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Regling, K., & Watson, M. (2010). A preliminary report on the sources of Ireland’s banking crisis. Dublin: Government Publications Office.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sieberer, U., Müller, W. C., & Heller, M. I. (2011). Reforming the rules of the parliamentary game: Measuring and explaining changes in parliamentary rules in Austria, Germany and Switzerland 1945-2010. West European Politics, 34 (5), 948-75.10.1080/01402382.2011.591079
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Suiter, J., & Farrell, D. M. (2011). The parties’ manifestos. In M. Gallagher & M. Marsh, How Ireland voted 2011: The full story of Ireland’s earthquake election. (pp. 29-46). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sub-Committee on Dáil Reform. (2016). Final report of the Sub-Committee on Dáil Reform. Retrieved from http://opac.oireachtas.ie/AWData/Library3/Final_Report_of_the_Sub-Committee_on_Dail_Reform_140623.pdf [23 March 2017].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TASC. (2010). Mapping the golden circle. Dublin: TASC.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tsebelis, G., & Rasch, B. E. (2011). Governments and legislative agenda setting. An introduction. In B. E. Rasch & G. Tsebelis (Eds), The role of governments in legislative agenda setting (pp. 1-20.). London & New York: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Dáil reforms since 2011: Pathway to power for the ‘puny’ parliament?

Abstract

Paradigm

My account