References
- Askim, J. (2007). How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73 (3), 453–72.
- Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63 (5), 586–606.
- Boedker, C., & Chua, W. F. (2013). Accounting as an affective technology: A study of circulation, agency and entrancement. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (4), 245–67.
- Bowerman, M., Francis, G., Ball, A., & Fry, J. (2002). The evolution of benchmarking in UK local authorities. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 9 (5), 429–49.
- Boyle, R. (2000). Performance measurement in local government [CPMR discussion paper 15]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
- Boyle, R. (2014). Public sector reform in Ireland: Views and experiences from senior executives [State of the Public Service Series, research paper no. 13]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
- Brown, K. W. (1993). The 10-point test of financial condition: Towards an easy-to-use assessment tool for smaller cities. Government Finance Review, 9 (6), 21–6.
- Brown, K. W. (1996). Trends in key ratios using the GFOA financial indicators database 1989–1993. Government Finance Review, 12 (6), 30–4.
- Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2006). Are citizens significant users of government financial information? Public Money and Management, 26 (4), 205–9.
- Cabaleiro, R., Buch, E., & Vaamonde, A. (2013). Developing a method to assessing the municipal financial health. American Review of Public Administration, 43 (6), 729–51.
- Carmeli, A. (2002). A conceptual and practical framework of measuring performance of local authorities in financial terms: Analysing the case of Israel. Local Government Studies, 28 (1), 21–36.
- Chapman, C. (1997). Reflection on a contingent view of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22 (2), 189–205.
- County and City Managers’ Association. (2013). Report to the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government. Retrieved from http://www.environ.ie/ [2 March 2016].
- Department of Finance. (2010). EU/IMF programme of financial support for Ireland. Retrieved from www.finance.gov.ie/documents/publications/reports/2011/euimfrevised.pdf [1 July 2015].
- Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2011). Public service reform. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.
- Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2015). Annual progress report on the public service reform plan 2014–16. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform.
- Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. (2012). Putting people first: Action programme for effective local government. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
- Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. (1996). Better local government – A programme for change. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
- Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. (2008). Green paper on local government reform: Stonger local democracy – options for change. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
- Espeland, W. N. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113 (1), 1–40.
- Feldman, M. S., & March, J. G. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (2), 171–86.
- Francis, G., & Holloway, J. (2007). What have we learned? Themes from the literature on best-practice benchmarking. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9 (3), 171–89.
- Game, C. (2006). Comprehensive performance assessment in English local government. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55 (6), 466–79.
- García-Sánchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Frías-Aceituno, J. V., & Mordan, N. (2012). A new predictor of local financial distress. International Journal of Public Administration, 35 (11), 739–48.
- Health Information and Quality Authority. (2013). Guidance on developing key performance indicators and minimum data sets to monitor healthcare quality. Dublin: Health Information and Quality Authority.
- Hendrick, R. (2004). Assessing and measuring the fiscal heath of local governments. Urban Affairs Review, 40 (1), 78–114.
- Hong, P., Hong, S. W., Roh, J. J., & Park, K. (2012). Evolving benchmarking practices: A review for research perspectives. Benchmarking, 19 (4), 444–62.
- Hood, C. (2007). Public service management by numbers: Why does it vary? Where has it come from? What are the gaps and the puzzles? Public Money & Management, 27 (2), 95–102.
- Humphreys, P. (2002). Effective consultation with the external customer [CPMR discussion paper 23]. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
- Hyndman N., & McGeough, F. (2008). NPM and performance measurement: A comparative study of the public sectors in Ireland and the UK. Irish Accounting Review, 15 (2), 29–57.
- Järvinen, J. (2009). Shifting NPM agendas and management accountants’ occupational identities. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22 (8), 1,187–210.
- Jordan, S., & Messner, M. (2012). Enabling control and the problem of incomplete performance indicators. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37 (7), 544–64.
- Julnes, P. D. L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61 (6), 693–708.
- Kleine, R., Kloha, P., & Weissert, C. S. (2003). Monitoring local government fiscal health: Michagan’s new 10-point scale of fiscal distress. Government Finance Review, 19 (3), 18–23.
- Kloha, P., Weissert, C. S., & Kleine, R. (2005a). Developing and testing a composite model to predict local fiscal distress. Public Administration Review, 65 (3), 313–23.
- Kloha, P., Weissert, C. S., & Kleine, R. (2005b). Someone to watch over me: State monitoring of local fiscal conditions. American Review of Public Administration, 35 (3), 236–55.
- Knox, C. (2012). The reform of public administration in Northern Ireland: A squandered opportunity? Administration, 60 (1), 117–38.
- Kuhlmann, S., & Jäkel, T. (2013). Competing, collaborating or controlling? Comparing benchmarking in European local government. Public Money and Management, 33 (4), 269–76.
- Local Government Audit Service. (2014). Activity report. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
- Local Government Efficiency Review Implementation Group. (2013). Further report to the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
- Magd, H., & Curry, A. (2003). Benchmarking: Achieving best value in public-sector organisations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 10 (3), 261–86.
- Malsch, B., & Gendron, Y. (2013). Re-theorizing change: Institutional experimentation and the struggle for domination in the field of public accounting. Journal of Management Studies, 50 (5), 870–99.
- Martin, S., Downe, J., Grace, C., & Nutley, S. (2013). New development: All change? Performance assessment regimes in UK local government. Public Money & Management, 33 (4), 277–80.
- McAteer, M., & Stephens, A. (2013). New development: The role of benchmarking in supporting improvement in local government – Scottish and Welsh practitioners’ perspectives. Public Money & Management, 33 (4), 281–4.
- Mercer, T., & Gilbert, M. (1996). A financial condition index for Nova Scotia municipalities. Government Finance Review, 12 (5), 36–8.
- Modell, S. (2004). Performance measurement myths in the public sector: A research note. Financial Accountability & Management, 20 (1), 39–57.
- Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20 (4), 849–66.
- Northcott, D., & Llewellyn, S. (2005). Benchmarking in UK health: A gap between policy and practice? Benchmarking, 12 (5), 419–35.
- Nutley, S., Downe, J., Martin, S., & Grace, C. (2012). Policy transfer and convergence within the UK: The case of local government performance improvement regimes. Policy and Politics, 40 (2), 193–209.
- Pidd, M. (2012). Measuring the performance of public services: Principles and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pollitt, C. (2006). Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16 (1), 25–44.
- Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform – a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Putting People First – a summary. (2012, Autumn/Winter). Local Authority Times, 16 (3 & 4), 1–7.
- Robbins, G., & Lapsley, I. (2005). NPM and the Irish public sector – From reluctant reformer to statutory codification. In J. Guthrie, C. Humphrey, O. Olson & L. Jones (Eds), International public financial management reform: Progress, contradictions and challenges. Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
- Robbins, G., & Lapsley, I. (2014). The success story of the Eurozone crisis? Ireland’s austerity measures. Public Money & Management, 34 (2), 91–8.
- Robbins, G., Turley, G., & McNena, S. (2014). From boom to bust? The financial performance of city and county councils. Administration, 62 (1), 119–51.
- Simon, H. A. (1937). Comparative statistics and the measurement of efficiency. National Municipal Review, 26, 524–7.
- Trosa, S., & Williams, S. (1996). Performance measurement in government. Paris: OECD.
- Turley, G., & Flannery, D. (2013). The impact of the economic boom and bust on local government budgets in Ireland. Administration, 61 (2), 33–56.
- Turley, G., Robbins, G., & McNena, S. (2015). A framework to measure the financial performance of local governments. Local Government Studies, 41 (3), 401–20.
- Wynn-Williams, K. L. H. (2005). Performance assessment and benchmarking in the public sector: An example from New Zealand. Benchmarking, 12 (5), 482–92.
- Yasin, M. M. (2002). The theory and practice of benchmarking: Then and now. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 9 (3), 217–43.
- Yetano, A. (2013). What drives the institutionalization of performance measurement and management in local government. Public Performance and Management Review, 37 (1), 59–86.
- Zafra-Gómez, J. L., López-Hernández, A. M., & Hernández-Bastida, A. (2009a). Developing an alert system for local governments in financial crisis. Public Money & Management, 29 (3), 175–81.
- Zafra-Gómez, J. L., López-Hernández, A. M., & Hernández-Bastida, A. (2009b). Evaluating financial performance in local government: Maximizing the benchmarking value. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75 (1), 151–67.