Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Local government reform – Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose? Cover

Local government reform – Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose?

Administration
Volume 63 (2015): Issue 2 (August 2015)
By:   
Open Access
|Aug 2015
References

References

  1. Advisory Expert Committee on Local Government Reorganisation and Reform. (1991).Dublin: The Stationery Office.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Batley, R., & Stoker, G. (1991).. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Boyle, R., & O’Riordan, J. (2013).Dublin: IPA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Callanan, M. (2008). Local government reform in Ireland. In B. E. Dollery, J. Garcea and E. C. LeSage (Eds),Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Cheyne, C. (2015). Changing urban governance in New Zealand: Public participation and democratic legitimacy in local authority planning and decision-making 1989–2014.Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2014.994740
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Commission on Taxation. (1985).. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities. (2013).. Retrieved from[10 July 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. County & City Managers’ Association. (2013).Dublin: County & City Managers’ Association.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Daly, M. E. (Ed.) (2001).. Dublin: IPA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Denters, B., & Rose, L. (Eds) (2005).. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Department of the Environment and Local Government. (2000).Dublin: Department of the Environment and Local Government.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. (2012).Dublin: Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. (2014).Retrieved from[10 January 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. (1996).Dublin: Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. (2008).Retrieved from[10 July 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. (2010).. Retrieved from[1 July 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Government of Ireland. (1971).. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Government of Ireland. (1972).Dublin: The Stationery Office.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Government of Ireland. (1985).Dublin: The Stationery Office.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Government of Ireland. (2011).Retrieved from[1 July 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Hogan, P. (2013, October 17).. Retrieved from[20 October 2013].
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Indecon. (2006).Dublin: Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. IPA. (1971).. Dublin: IPA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. KPMG. (1996).Dublin: KPMG.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Lee, J. (1985).Cambridge: University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Local Government Efficiency Review Implementation Group. (2012).Retrieved from[21 August 2014].
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Local Government Efficiency Review Implementation Group. (2013).Retrieved from[30 September 2014].
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. MacCarthaigh, M., & Callanan, M. (2006). Latest review of local government finance unveiled.(1), 3–8.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. McKinsey & Co. (1971).Dublin: The Stationery Office.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. National Economic and Social Council. (1985).[NESC report no. 80]. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. OECD. (2008).Paris: OECD.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. O’Halpin, E. (2001). The system of city and county management. In M. E. Daly (Ed.),. Dublin: IPA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. O’Leary E. (Ed.) (2005).. Dublin: The Liffey Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Public Services Organisation Review Group. (1969).Dublin: The Stationery Office.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Purcell, M. (2014).Retrieved from[10 July 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Rhodes, M. L., & Boyle, R. (2012). Progress and pitfalls in public service reform and performance management in Ireland.(1), 31–59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Roche, D. (1982). Dublin: IPA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes. (2009).[Volumes I & II]. Retrieved from[1 July 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Task Force on Integration of Local Government and Local Development Systems (1998).Retrieved from[10 July 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Walker, D. (1962)[paper no. 5]. Dublin: Economic Research Institute.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/admin-2015-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2449-9471 (formerly 0001-8325) | Journal ISSN: 0001-8325
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 29
Published on: Aug 21, 2015
Published by: The Institute of Public Administration of Ireland
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Local government reform,
form, functions and finance,
innovation and incrementalism
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Business management,
Human resources, labor practice, job and career,
Industries,
Public sector, public private partnerships, public administration,
Social sciences,
Political science,
Local government and administration

© 2015 Bríd Quinn, published by The Institute of Public Administration of Ireland
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 63 (2015): Issue 2 (August 2015)
Previous article
Next article