Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Extensible Model for Comparison of Expressiveness of Object-Oriented Programming Languages Cover

Extensible Model for Comparison of Expressiveness of Object-Oriented Programming Languages

Applied Computer Systems
Volume 20 (2016): Issue 1 (December 2016)
By: Ruslan Batdalov,  Oksana Ņikiforova and  Adrian Giurca  
Open Access
|Jan 2017

References

  1. [1] Matrix Resources, “June TIOBE index indicates the fall of programming market leaders,” June 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.matrixres.com/resources/tech-trends/june-tiobe-index-indicates-the-fall-of-programming-market-leaders/ [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] J. Gosling, B. Joy, G. Steele, G. Bracha, and A. Buckley, “The Java language specification: Java® SE 8 edition,” March 2015. [Online]. Available: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se8/jls8.pdf [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] R. Batdalov, “Is there a need for a programming language adapted for implementation of design patterns?” in Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (EuroPLoP), Irsee, Germany, July 6–10, 2016.10.1145/3011784.3011822
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] S. J. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1995.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] A. Leitão, S. Proença, “On the expressive power of programming languages for generative design: the case of higher-order functions,” in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe), Newcastle upon Tyne, England, Sep. 22–26, 2014, pp. 257–266.10.52842/conf.ecaade.2014.1.257
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] W. M. Farmer, “Chiron: a multi-paradigm logic,” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, vol. 10, no. 23, 2007, pp. 1–19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] S. C. McConnell, Code Complete, Microsoft Press, 2004.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] D. Berkholz, “Programming languages ranked by expressiveness,” March 2013. [Online]. Available: http://redmonk.com/dberkholz/2013/03/25/programming-languages-ranked-by-expressiveness/ [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Y. Zhang, M. C. Loring, G. Salvaneschi, B. Liskov and A. C. Myers, “Lightweight, flexible object-oriented generics” in Proceedings of the 36th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, Portland, OR, June 13–17, 2015, pp. 436–445. https://doi.org/10.1145/2737924.273800810.1145/2737924.2738008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] D. E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming: Fundamental Algorithms, Addison-Wesley, 1997.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Ž. Vaira and A. Čaplinskas, “Software engineering paradigm independent design problems, GoF 23 design patterns, and aspect design,” Informatica, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 289–317, Apr. 2011.10.15388/Informatica.2011.328
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Z. Anik and O. F. Baykoç, “Comparison of the most popular object-oriented software languages and criterions for introductory programming courses with analytic network process: a pilot study,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 89–96, March 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.2029410.1002/cae.20294
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] N. Archvadze and M. Pkhovelishvili, “Reforming the trees – C# and F# comparison,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Problems of Cybernetics and Informatics (PCI), Baku, Azerbaijan, Sep. 12–14, 2012, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCI.2012.648628710.1109/ICPCI.2012.6486287
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] B. M. Brosgol, “A comparison of generic template support: Ada, C++, C#, and Java ™,” in Proceedings of the 15th Ada-Europe International Conference on Reliable Software Technologies (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Valencia, Spain, June 14–18, 2010, pp. 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13550-7_1610.1007/978-3-642-13550-7_16
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] R. Lämmel, M. Leinberger, T. Schmorleiz and A. Varanovich, “Comparison of feature implementations across languages, technologies, and styles,” in Proceedings of Software Evolution Week / IEEE Conference on Software Maintenance, Reengineering, and Reverse Engineering (CSMR-WCRE), Antwerp, Belgium, Feb. 3–6, 2014, pp. 333–337. https://doi.org/10.1109/csmr-wcre.2014.674718810.1109/CSMR-WCRE.2014.6747188
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] M. Stein and A. Geyer-Schulz, “A comparison of five programming languages in a graph clustering scenario,” Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 428–456, 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] N. Togashi and V. Klyuev, “Concurrency in Go and Java: performance analysis” in Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology (ICIST), Shenzen, China, Apr. 26–28, 2014, pp. 213–216. https://doi.org/10.1109/icist.2014.692036810.1109/ICIST.2014.6920368
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] F. Buschmann, K. Henney and D. C. Schmidt, Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture Volume 5: On Patterns and Pattern Languages, Wiley, 2007.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] R. Batdalov, “Inheritance and class structure,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific-Practical Conference Object Systems – 2010, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, May 10–12, 2010, pp. 92–95.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] R. Batdalov and O. Nikiforova, “Towards easier implementation of design patterns,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2016), Rome, Italy, August 21–25, 2016, pp. 123–128.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] OMG, “OMG Unified Modeling Language™ (OMG UML),” March 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5/PDF [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] B. C. Pierce, Types and Programming Languages, MIT Press, 2002.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson and J. Vlissides, Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1995.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] F. Buschmann, R. Meunier, H. Rohnert, P. Sommerlad and M. Stal, Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns, Wiley, 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] M. Fowler, Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture, Addison-Wesley, 2003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Python Software Foundation, “The Python Language Reference,” Oct. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://docs.python.org/3/reference/index.html [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Mozilla Developer Network, “JavaScript Reference,” November 2016. [Online]. Available: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Perl 5 Porters, “Language Reference.” [Online]. Available: http://perldoc.perl.org/index-language.html [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] ISO/IEC, “Information technology – Programming languages – C++,” ISO/IEC standard 14882:2014(E), Dec. 15, 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Microsoft Corporation, “C# Language Specification: Version 5.0,” 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=7029 [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] PHP Group, “Language Reference,” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.php.net/manual/en/langref.php [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Microsoft Corporation, “The Microsoft® Visual Basic® Language Specification: Version 11.0,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=15039 [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] ISO/IEC, “Information technology – Programming languages – Ruby,” ISO/IEC standard 30170:2012(E), April 15, 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] M. Odersky, P. Altherr, V. Cremet, G. Dubochet, B. Emir et al., “Scala Language Specification: Version 2.11.” [Online]. Available: http://www.scala-lang.org/files/archive/spec/2.11/ [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Google, “The Go Programming Language Specification,” May 31, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.golang.org/ref/spec [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] JetBrains, “Kotlin Language Documentation.” [Online]. Available: http://www.kotlinlang.org/docs/kotlin-docs.pdf [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] R. Johnson, J. Hoeller, K. Donald, C. Shampaleanu, R. Harrop et al., “Spring Framework Reference Documentation,” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/5.0.0.M3/spring-framework-reference/htmlsingle/ [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] TIOBE, “TIOBE Programming Community Index Definition.” [Online]. Available: http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/programming-languages-definition/ [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/acss-2016-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 27 - 35
Published on: Jan 23, 2017
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Programming languages,
programming language comparison,
programming language expressiveness,
programming language expressive power
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Information technology,
Project management,
Software development

© 2017 Ruslan Batdalov, Oksana Ņikiforova, Adrian Giurca, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 20 (2016): Issue 1 (December 2016)Next article