Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of Sequence Diagram Layout in Advanced UML Modelling Tools Cover

Analysis of Sequence Diagram Layout in Advanced UML Modelling Tools

Applied Computer Systems
Volume 19 (2016): Issue 1 (May 2016)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|May 2016
References

References

  1. [1] UML,[Online] Available:
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2][Online]. Available:[Accessed: Mar. 21, 2016].
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] A. Galapovs and O. Nikiforova, “UML Diagram Layouting: the State of the Art,”vol. 47, pp. 101–108, 2011, [Online]. Available:[Accessed: Mar. 21, 2016].
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] A. Galapovs, O. Nikiforova, “Several Issues on the Definition of Algorithm for the Layout of the UML Class Diagram,” inJune 8–11, 2011, Beijing, China. SciTePress Digital Library 2011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. [5] O. Nikiforova, N. Pavlova, “Development of the Tool for Generation of UML Class Diagram from Two-hemisphere model,” in, ICSEA,, ENTISY, Mannaert H., Dini C., Ohta T., Pellerin R. (Eds.), Published by IEEE Computer Society, Conference Proceedings Services (CPS), pp. 105–112, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] O. Nikiforova“BrainTool. A Tool for Generation of the UML Class Diagrams,” in, Mannaert H. et al. (Eds), IARIA, Lisbon, Portugal, Nov. 18–23, 2012, pp. 60–69.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] O. Nikiforova“BrainTool v2.0 for Software Modelling in UML,”, Grundspenkis J.. (Eds), vol. 16, 2014, pp. 33–42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] O. Nikiforova, N. Pavlova, K. Gusarovs, O. Gorbiks, J. Vorotilovs, A. Zaharovs, D. Umanovskis, and J. Sejans, Eds., “Development of the Tool for Transformation of the Two-Hemisphere Model to the UML Class Diagram: Technical Solutions and Lessons Learned,” in, April 26–27, 2012, Jelgava, Latvia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Visual Paradigm. (2011, May)., [Online]. Available:[Accessed: Mar. 21, 2016].
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Wan Hashira Wan Husting“Investigation of diagrams layout,”University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] S. M. Thomas, “Evaluation of UML tools using an end-to-end application,” Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] H. Fuhrmann, M. Sponemann, M. Matzen, “Automatic Layout and Structure-Based Editing of UML Diagrams” Department of Computer Science Christian-Albrechts-Universitat Kiel, Germany, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] G. D. Battista, P. Eades, R. Tamassia, and I. G. Tollis, “Graph Drawing,” in. Prentice Hall, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] M. Kaufmann and D. Wagner, Eds., “Drawing Graphs” in, ser. LNCS. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2001, no. 2025.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. [15] M. Junger and P. Mutzel, “Graph Drawing Software,” Springer, Oct. 2003.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. [16] G. Hoops, “Automatic Layout of UML Sequence diagram,” Diplomarbeit eingereicht im Jahr 2013 Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] G. Di Battista, P. Eades, R. Tamassia, I. G. Tollis,, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] P. Healy, S. N. Nikolov, “Hierarchical Graph Drawing,” R. Tamassia eds.,, CRC Press, pp. 409–453.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] C. Sibertin-Blanc, N. Hameurlain and O. Tahir, “Ambiguity and structural properties of basic sequence diagrams,” invol. 4, pp. 275–284, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] O. Nikiforova, D. Ahilcenoka, D. Ungurs, K. Gusarovs, L. Kozacenko, “Several Issues on the Layout of the UML Sequence and Class Diagram,” in, ICSEA 2014, France, Nice, 12–16 Oct., 2014. Wilmington: IARIA, 2014, pp. 40–47.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Visual Paradigm,. [Online] Available:[Accessed: Mar. 21, 2016].
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Sparx systems,. Available:[Accessed: Mar. 21, 2016].
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] H.C. Purchase, J-A. Allder and D. Carrington, “Graph Layout Aesthetics in UML Diagrams: User Preferences,”, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 255–279, 2002. [Online]. Available: Universitat Trier.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] A. A. A. Jilani, M. Usman, Z. Halim, “Model Transformations in Model Driven Architecture,”, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50–54, October 2010. [Online] Available: UNICSE,. [Accessed May 28, 2012]
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] M. Kardos, M. Drozdova, “Analytical Method of CIM to PIM Transformation in Model Driven Architecture (MDA),”, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 89–99, May 2010. [Abstract]. Available:. [Accessed: Mar. 21, 2016].
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] A. Kleppe, J. Warmer and W. Ba,USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] K. Hamilton and R. Miles,, USA: O'Reilly, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/acss-2016-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683 (formerly 2255-8691)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 43
Published on: May 28, 2016
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
UML sequence diagram,
layout,
system modelling,
UML modelling tool
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Information technology,
Project management,
Software development

© 2016 Oksana Ņikiforova, Sergii Putintsev, Dace Ahiļčenoka, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 19 (2016): Issue 1 (May 2016)
Previous article
Next article