Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Softwareland Chronicles: A Software Development Meta-Process Proposal Cover

Softwareland Chronicles: A Software Development Meta-Process Proposal

Applied Computer Systems
Volume 19 (2016): Issue 1 (May 2016)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|May 2016
References

References

  1. [1] J. Osis and E. Asnina. “Is Modeling a Treatment for the Weakness of Software Engineering?” in. IGI Global, New York, USA, pp. 1–14, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] P. Naur and B. Randell,,,, Garmisch, Germany, November, 1968.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] S. McConnell,, Microsoft Press, 1996.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] J. Maeda,, Gedisa, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] R. W. Winston,:, July 22–26, 2002, Los Ángeles, USA, 1970.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] T. Clancy, “The Extreme Chaos,” Standish Group International Inc., 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] R. L. Glass, “The Standish Report: does it really describe a software crisis?”, vol. 49, no. 8 pp. 15–15, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] B. Boehm, “A spiral model of software development and enhancement,”, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 61–72, 1988.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] K. Forsberg and H. Mooz, “The relationship of system engineering to the project cycle,”, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 1981.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] M. C. Paulk, C. V. Weber, B. Curtis and M. B. Chrissis,, Addison Wesley, 1994.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] P. B. Kruchten,Addison Wesley, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] U. Donins, J. Osis, A. Slihte, E. Asnina and B. Gulbis.:, Portugal, pp. 79–88, 2011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. [13] J. Osis, E. Asnina and A. Grave, “Computation Independent Representation of the Problem Domain in MDA,”, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–46, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] K. Schwaber,, New York, USA. Springer, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 170–175, 1995.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] E. S. Raymond,, O’Reilly, 1999
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. [16] R. L. Glass, “Agile versus traditional: Make love not war,”, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 12–18, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] M. McCormick, “Technical opinion: Programming extremism,”, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 109–119, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] AVOCA-GmbH, “Extreme Programming”, 2012. [Online]. Available:
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] H. Saiedian, “Panel: Extreme programming: helpful or harmful?”Washington, USA. IEEE Computer Society, p. 718, 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] S. Chatterjee, “The waterfall that won’t go away,”, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 9–10, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] M. Stephens,, 2012. [Online]. Available:
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] S. R. Rakitin, “Manifesto elicits cynicism,”, vol. 34, pp. 4–7, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] J. Nandhakumar and D. E. Avison, “The fiction of methodological development: a field study of information systems development,”, vol. 12, pp. 176–191, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] D. Truex, R. Baskerville and J. Travis, “Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods, Accounting,”, vol. 10, pp. 53–79, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] W. Hesse, “Dinosaur meets archaeopteryx? or: Is there an alternative for rational unified process?”, vol. 2, pp. 240–247, 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] D. D. McCracken and M. A. Jackson, “Life cycle concept considered harmful,”, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 29–32, 1982.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] C. Andersen,, La galera, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] N. B. Ruparelia, “Software development lifecycle models,”, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 8–13, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] R. Hoda, P. Kruchten, J. Noble and S. Marshall, “Agility in context,”, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 74–88, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] E. A. Abbott,, John Wilson and Son, Cambridge, 1885.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] L. Wang, “Agility counts in developing small-size software,”, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 16–23, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] K. Sureshchandra and J. Shrinivasavadhani, “Moving from waterfall to agile,” in, AGILE '08., Toronto, USA, IEEE, 2008, pp. 97–101.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] T. Khne, “Matters of (meta-) modeling,”, vol. 5, pp. 369–385, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] R. Zach, “Hilbert’s Program Then and Now”, 2015. [Online]. Available:
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] J. Strick, “Darwinism and the origin of life: The role of H. C. Bastian in the British spontaneous generation debates,”, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1868–1873, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. [36] P. Clarke and R. V. O’Connor, “The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework,”, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 433–447, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] J. C. Derniame, B. A. Kaba and D. Wastell,, Springer-Verlag, 1999.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. [38] E. Asnina and J. Osis, “Topological Functioning Model as a CIM-Business Model,” in. IGI Global, New York, USA, pp. 40–64, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. [39] J. Sanders, “Spice: New directions in software process assessment,” in, University of Iceland, 1970.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. [40] M. Suula, T. Makinen and T. Varkoi, “An approach to characterize a software process,” in, PICMET '09. IEEE, pp. 1003–1109, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. [41] J. E. Gibson, “Cause and effect analysis: “power tool” for total quality,”, EEIC/ICWA, Chicago, USA, pp. 751–753, 1993.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. [42] E. Asnina and J. Osis, “Computation Independent Models: Bridging Problem and Solution Domains,” in, Portugal, pp. 23–32, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. [43] F. Woo, R. Mikusauskas, D. Bartlett and R. Law, “A framework for the effective adoption of software development methodologies,” in, New York, USA, ACM, pp. 198–203, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. [44] E. Germain and P. N. Robillard, “Engineering-based processes and agile methodologies for software development: a comparative case study,”, vol. 75, no. 1–2, pp. 17–27, 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. [45] F. Garca, M. Piattini, F. Ruiz, G. Canfora and C. A. Visaggio, “FMESP: Framework for the modeling and evaluation of software processes,”, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 627–639, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. [46] C. Gonzalez-Perez and B. Henderson-Sellers, “Modelling software development methodologies: A conceptual foundation,”, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 1778–1796, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. [47] F. Brooks,, Addison Wesley, 1995.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. [48] S. Dakhli and M. Ben Chouikha, “The knowledge-gap reduction in software engineering,” in, Fez, USA, IEEE, pp. 287–294, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. [49] M. Polanyi,, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. [50] M. Shaw and D. Garlan,, Prentice Hall, 1996.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. [51] C. Atkinson and T. Kuhne, “Model-driven development: a metamodeling foundation,”, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 36–41, 2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. [52] S. J. Bolaños-Castro, R. Gonzalez-Crespo and V. H. Medina-Garcia, “Antipatterns: A Compendium of Bad Practices in Software Development Processes,” in, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 41–46, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. [53] S.J. Bolaños-Castro, R. Gonzalez-Crespo, and V. H. Medina-Garcia, “Patterns of Software Development Process,”, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 33–40, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. [54] S. J. Bolaños-Castro, R. Gonzalez-Crespo and V. H. Medina-Garcia, “Patterns of Software Development Process,”, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 818–824, 2014.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. [55] A. Slihte, J. Osis and U. Donins, “Knowledge Integration for Domain Modeling,” in, Portugal, pp. 46–56, 2011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. [56] J. Osis and A. Slihte, “Transforming Textual Use Cases to a Computation Independent Model,” in, Portugal, pp. 33–42, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. [57] J. Osis and U. Donins, “Formalization of the UML Class Diagrams,”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp. 180–192, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/acss-2016-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683 (formerly 2255-8691)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 14
Published on: May 28, 2016
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Software development meta-process,
software process-and-methodology modeling language
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Information technology,
Project management,
Software development

© 2016 Sandro Bolanos, Rubén González Crespo, Jordán Pascual Espada, Vicente García-Díaz, Jānis Osis, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 19 (2016): Issue 1 (May 2016)
Next article