Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Softwareland Chronicles: A Software Development Meta-Process Proposal Cover

Softwareland Chronicles: A Software Development Meta-Process Proposal

Applied Computer Systems
Volume 19 (2016): Issue 1 (May 2016)
By: Sandro Bolanos,  Rubén González Crespo,  Jordán Pascual Espada,  Vicente García-Díaz and  Jānis Osis  
Open Access
|May 2016

References

  1. [1] J. Osis and E. Asnina. “Is Modeling a Treatment for the Weakness of Software Engineering?” in Model-Driven Domain Analysis and Software Development: Architectures and Functions. IGI Global, New York, USA, pp. 1–14, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-874-2.ch001
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] P. Naur and B. Randell, Software engineering: Report of a conference sponsored by the NATO science committee, Scientific Affairs Division, NATO, Garmisch, Germany, November, 1968.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] S. McConnell, Rapid Development, Microsoft Press, 1996.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] J. Maeda, Las leyes de la simplicidad, Gedisa, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] R. W. Winston, Managing the development of large software systems: IEEE WESCON, July 22–26, 2002, Los Ángeles, USA, 1970.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] T. Clancy, “The Extreme Chaos,” Standish Group International Inc., 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] R. L. Glass, “The Standish Report: does it really describe a software crisis?” Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, no. 8 pp. 15–15, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1145287.1145301
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] B. Boehm, “A spiral model of software development and enhancement,” Computer, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 61–72, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.59
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] K. Forsberg and H. Mooz, “The relationship of system engineering to the project cycle,” National Council On System Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 1981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.1991.tb01484.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] M. C. Paulk, C. V. Weber, B. Curtis and M. B. Chrissis, The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Addison Wesley, 1994.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] P. B. Kruchten, The Rational Unified Process (An Introduction), Addison Wesley, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] U. Donins, J. Osis, A. Slihte, E. Asnina and B. Gulbis. Towards the Refinement of Topological Class Diagram as a Platform Independent Model: ENASE Model-Driven Architecture and Modeling-Driven Software Development, Portugal, pp. 79–88, 2011.10.5220/0003583600790088
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] J. Osis, E. Asnina and A. Grave, “Computation Independent Representation of the Problem Domain in MDA,” e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–46, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] K. Schwaber, Scrum Development Process: OOPSLA95 Business Object Design and Implementation Workshop, New York, USA. Springer, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 170–175, 1995.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] E. S. Raymond, The Cathedral and the Bazaar, O’Reilly, 199910.5210/fm.v3i2.578
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] R. L. Glass, “Agile versus traditional: Make love not war,” Cutter IT Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 12–18, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] M. McCormick, “Technical opinion: Programming extremism,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 109–119, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/376134.376181
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] AVOCA-GmbH, “Extreme Programming”, 2012. [Online]. Available: www.avocallc.com/downloads/
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] H. Saiedian, “Panel: Extreme programming: helpful or harmful?” Proceedings. International Conference on Software Engineering, Washington, USA. IEEE Computer Society, p. 718, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icse.2003.1201258
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] S. Chatterjee, “The waterfall that won’t go away,” SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 9–10, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1668862.1668875
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] M. Stephens, The Case against Extreme Programming, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.softwarereality.com/lifecycle/xp/case_against_xp.jsp
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] S. R. Rakitin, “Manifesto elicits cynicism,” Computer, vol. 34, pp. 4–7, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] J. Nandhakumar and D. E. Avison, “The fiction of methodological development: a field study of information systems development,” Information Technology & People, vol. 12, pp. 176–191, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09593849910267224
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] D. Truex, R. Baskerville and J. Travis, “Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods, Accounting,” Management and Information Technologies, vol. 10, pp. 53–79, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8022(99)00009-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] W. Hesse, “Dinosaur meets archaeopteryx? or: Is there an alternative for rational unified process?” Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 2, pp. 240–247, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-003-0033-y
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] D. D. McCracken and M. A. Jackson, “Life cycle concept considered harmful,” SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 29–32, 1982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1005937.1005943
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] C. Andersen, El traje Nuevo del emperador, La galera, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] N. B. Ruparelia, “Software development lifecycle models,” SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 8–13, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1764810.1764814
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] R. Hoda, P. Kruchten, J. Noble and S. Marshall, “Agility in context,” ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 74–88, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1932682.1869467
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] E. A. Abbott, Flatland: A romance of many dimensions, John Wilson and Son, Cambridge, 1885.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] L. Wang, “Agility counts in developing small-size software,” IEEE Potentials, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 16–23, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MPOT.2007.906114
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] K. Sureshchandra and J. Shrinivasavadhani, “Moving from waterfall to agile,” in Agile Conf., AGILE '08., Toronto, USA, IEEE, 2008, pp. 97–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/agile.2008.49
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] T. Khne, “Matters of (meta-) modeling,” Software and Systems Modeling, vol. 5, pp. 369–385, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10270-006-0017-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] R. Zach, “Hilbert’s Program Then and Now”, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0508572
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] J. Strick, “Darwinism and the origin of life: The role of H. C. Bastian in the British spontaneous generation debates,” Journal of the History of Biolog, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1868–1873, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004460408116
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. [36] P. Clarke and R. V. O’Connor, “The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 433–447, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.12.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] J. C. Derniame, B. A. Kaba and D. Wastell, Software process: principles, methodology, and technology, Springer-Verlag, 1999.10.1007/BFb0057000
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. [38] E. Asnina and J. Osis, “Topological Functioning Model as a CIM-Business Model,” in Model-Driven Domain Analysis and Software Development: Architectures and Functions. IGI Global, New York, USA, pp. 40–64, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-874-2.ch003
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. [39] J. Sanders, “Spice: New directions in software process assessment,” in Proc. of Quality and Productivity in Software Development Conf., University of Iceland, 1970.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. [40] M. Suula, T. Makinen and T. Varkoi, “An approach to characterize a software process,” in Int. Conf. on Management of Engineering & Technology, PICMET '09. IEEE, pp. 1003–1109, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/picmet.2009.5262007
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. [41] J. E. Gibson, “Cause and effect analysis: “power tool” for total quality,” Electrical Electronics Insulation Conference and Electrical Manufacturing & Coil Winding Conference, EEIC/ICWA, Chicago, USA, pp. 751–753, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EEIC.1993.631320
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. [42] E. Asnina and J. Osis, “Computation Independent Models: Bridging Problem and Solution Domains,” in ENASE Model-Driven Architecture and Modeling Theory-Driven Development, Portugal, pp. 23–32, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. [43] F. Woo, R. Mikusauskas, D. Bartlett and R. Law, “A framework for the effective adoption of software development methodologies,” in ACMSE Proc. of the 44th Annual Southeast Regional Conf., New York, USA, ACM, pp. 198–203, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1185448.1185493
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. [44] E. Germain and P. N. Robillard, “Engineering-based processes and agile methodologies for software development: a comparative case study,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 75, no. 1–2, pp. 17–27, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2004.02.022
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. [45] F. Garca, M. Piattini, F. Ruiz, G. Canfora and C. A. Visaggio, “FMESP: Framework for the modeling and evaluation of software processes,” Journal of Systems Architecture, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 627–639, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2006.06.007
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. [46] C. Gonzalez-Perez and B. Henderson-Sellers, “Modelling software development methodologies: A conceptual foundation,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 1778–1796, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.02.048
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. [47] F. Brooks, The Mythical Man – Month, Addison Wesley, 1995.10.1109/MS.1995.10042
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. [48] S. Dakhli and M. Ben Chouikha, “The knowledge-gap reduction in software engineering,” in Third Int. Conf. on Research Challenges in Information Science, Fez, USA, IEEE, pp. 287–294, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2009.5089292
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. [49] M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. [50] M. Shaw and D. Garlan, Software Architecture, Prentice Hall, 1996.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. [51] C. Atkinson and T. Kuhne, “Model-driven development: a metamodeling foundation,” IEEE Software, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 36–41, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MS.2003.1231149
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. [52] S. J. Bolaños-Castro, R. Gonzalez-Crespo and V. H. Medina-Garcia, “Antipatterns: A Compendium of Bad Practices in Software Development Processes,” in Int. J. of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 41–46, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2011.147
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. [53] S.J. Bolaños-Castro, R. Gonzalez-Crespo, and V. H. Medina-Garcia, “Patterns of Software Development Process,” Int. J. of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 33–40, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2011.146
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. [54] S. J. Bolaños-Castro, R. Gonzalez-Crespo and V. H. Medina-Garcia, “Patterns of Software Development Process,” IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 818–824, 2014.10.1109/TLA.2014.6868888
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. [55] A. Slihte, J. Osis and U. Donins, “Knowledge Integration for Domain Modeling,” in ENASE Model-Driven Architecture and Modeling-Driven Software Development, Portugal, pp. 46–56, 2011.10.5220/0003581200460056
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. [56] J. Osis and A. Slihte, “Transforming Textual Use Cases to a Computation Independent Model,” in ENASE Model-Driven Architecture and Modeling Theory-Driven Development, Portugal, pp. 33–42, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. [57] J. Osis and U. Donins, “Formalization of the UML Class Diagrams,” Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp. 180–192, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14819-4_13
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/acss-2016-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8691 | Journal ISSN: 2255-8683
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 14
Published on: May 28, 2016
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Software development meta-process,
software process-and-methodology modeling language
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Information technology,
Project management,
Software development

© 2016 Sandro Bolanos, Rubén González Crespo, Jordán Pascual Espada, Vicente García-Díaz, Jānis Osis, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 19 (2016): Issue 1 (May 2016)Next article