Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Targeting prolyl tripeptidyl peptidase from Porphyromonas gingivalis with the bioactive compounds from Rosmarinus officinalis Cover

Targeting prolyl tripeptidyl peptidase from Porphyromonas gingivalis with the bioactive compounds from Rosmarinus officinalis

Open Access
|Jun 2020

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

3D structure of ptp-A as visualized by RasMol (helix, pink color; beta sheet, yellow; turns, white). 3D, three dimensional

Figure 2

Structure of the selected biocompounds from R. officinalis

Table 1

Molinspiration calculations of Rosmarinus officinalis biocompounds and drug likeliness of the R. officinalis against ptp-A of Porphyromonas gingivalis

CompoundsMolecular weightMolecular formulaHydrogen bond donorHydrogen bond acceptorLogPRotatable bondsTPSAVolumeN atomsG protein-coupled receptors ligandIon channel modulatorKinase inhibitorNuclear receptor ligandProtease inhibitorEnzyme inhibitor
Carnosic acid332.44C20H28O4344.60277.75322.31240.410.24−0.240.72−0.010.32
Rosmarinic acid360.318C18H16O8581.637144.52303.54260.17−0.08−0.180.570.150.24
p-Coumaric acid164.16C9H8O3231.43257.53146.4812−0.56−0.26−0.91−0.12−0.87−0.15
Luteolin286.239C15H10O6461.971111.12232.0721−0.02−0.070.260.39−0.220.28
Amoxicillin365.404C16H19N3O5S58−1.324132.96306.89250.07−0.42−0.65−0.470.840.27

[i] TPSA, topological polar surface area.

Table 2

Docking results of R. officinalis biocompounds with ptp-A of P. gingivalis (energy in kcal/mol)

ptp-A docking with compoundsNumber of hydrogen bondsBinding energyLigand efficiencyIntermolecular energyvdW + Hbond + desolv energyElectrostatic energyTorsional energyTotal internal unbound
Carnosic acid5−7.19−0.3−8.68−7.56−1.111.49−1.38
Rosmarinic acid10−9.81−0.38−12.2−11.88−0.312.39−2.23
p-Coumaric acid5−6.34−0.53−7.53−6.72−0.811.19−0.07
Luteolin7−9.99−0.48−11.48−11.47−0.021.49−1.37
Amoxicillin4−7.18−0.29−9.26−7.3−1.972.09−2.12
Table 3

Interactions of R. officinalis biocompounds with ptp-A of P. gingivalis

PTPA docking with compoundsHydrogen bond interactionsVan der Waals interactionsp–s, p–p T, amide–p interactionsAlkyl/p–alkyl interactionsSalt bridge/attractive charge
Carnosic acid5 (LYS210, TRP214, ASP153)6 (LEU289, SER290, PHE213, TRP214, PHE154, SER155)5 (TRP291, PRO340, PRO156)
Rosmarinic acid10 (HIS522, ASN558, ARG356, GLU564, GLN354)4 (SER355, TRP353, ALA523, ASN367)3 (ALA557, LEU338, ARG356)3 (GLU564, GLU336, GLU382)
p-Coumaric acid5 (SER603, TYR518, GLU45, TYR47)5 (TYR516, PHE46, ARG717, PHE49, HIS710)1 (TRP602)
Luteolin7 (HIS339, LEU388, GLN354, ARG356, TYR334, GLU564, GLN565)6 (GLU329, TRP353, ARG357, ASP331, LEU338, GLU336)2 (PRO337, SER355)
1 (ARG356)
2 (VAL335, ARG 356)
Amoxicillin4 (GLU209, ASN288)6 (GLY207, ILE208, LEU289, TYR224, HIS339, HIS522)5 (LEU338, PHE213, PRO340)
Figure 3

Biovia discovery studio visualization of the hydrogen interactions between ptp-A and (A) carnosic acid, (B) rosmarinic acid, (C) p-coumaric acid, (D) luteolin, and (E) amoxicillin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/abm-2019-0061 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 197 - 203
Published on: Jun 4, 2020
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Ashwin Kumar Ramalingam, Smiline Girija Aseervatham Selvi, Vijayashree Priyadharsini Jayaseelan, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.