Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Development of assisted reproductive technology services in Thailand between 2008 and 2014 before the new law: Results generated from the National ART Registry, Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Cover

Development of assisted reproductive technology services in Thailand between 2008 and 2014 before the new law: Results generated from the National ART Registry, Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Open Access
|Jun 2020

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Trends of the number of ART centers (white bars) and total ART cycles (initiated cycles; light-gray bars and FET cycles; black bars) in Thailand (unit in hundred) between 2008 and 2014.
Trends of the number of ART centers (white bars) and total ART cycles (initiated cycles; light-gray bars and FET cycles; black bars) in Thailand (unit in hundred) between 2008 and 2014.

Figure 2

The proportion of ART techniques in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. The bars represent the ART techniques; ICSI surgically retrieved sperm (white bars), ICSI ejaculated sperm (light-gray bars), IVF (medium-gray bars), ZIFT (dark-gray bars), GIFT (black bars).
The proportion of ART techniques in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. The bars represent the ART techniques; ICSI surgically retrieved sperm (white bars), ICSI ejaculated sperm (light-gray bars), IVF (medium-gray bars), ZIFT (dark-gray bars), GIFT (black bars).

Figure 3

The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer of each ART techniques in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. The bars represent the ART techniques; ICSI surgically retrieved sperm (white bars), ICSI ejaculated sperm (light-gray bars), IVF (medium-gray bars), ZIFT (dark-gray bars), GIFT (black bars).
The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer of each ART techniques in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. The bars represent the ART techniques; ICSI surgically retrieved sperm (white bars), ICSI ejaculated sperm (light-gray bars), IVF (medium-gray bars), ZIFT (dark-gray bars), GIFT (black bars).

Figure 4

Comparison of the clinical pregnancy rate per transfer between fresh (dark-gray bars) and frozen-thawed (light-gray bars) cycles in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns = P > 0.05.
Comparison of the clinical pregnancy rate per transfer between fresh (dark-gray bars) and frozen-thawed (light-gray bars) cycles in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns = P > 0.05.

Figure 5

Comparison of the clinical pregnancy rate per transfer and the pregnancy results among different female partner age groups between fresh cycle (white bars) and frozen-thawed cycle (gray bars) in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. *P < 0.01.
Comparison of the clinical pregnancy rate per transfer and the pregnancy results among different female partner age groups between fresh cycle (white bars) and frozen-thawed cycle (gray bars) in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. *P < 0.01.

Figure 6

Comparison trend of the clinical pregnancy rates with PGS cycles in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. The lines show pregnancies/initiated cycles (circles, dashed lines), pregnancies/retrieved cycles (squares, unbroken lines), and pregnancies/transfer cycles (triangles, unbroken lines).
Comparison trend of the clinical pregnancy rates with PGS cycles in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. The lines show pregnancies/initiated cycles (circles, dashed lines), pregnancies/retrieved cycles (squares, unbroken lines), and pregnancies/transfer cycles (triangles, unbroken lines).

Figure 7

Trends of the percentage of the ratio of ART birth rate to natural birth rate in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. The lines show birth rate from ART/1000 (unbroken lines), national birth rate/100 (dotted lines), and birth rate from ART/natural birth rate (%) (dashed lines).
Trends of the percentage of the ratio of ART birth rate to natural birth rate in Thailand between 2008 and 2014. The lines show birth rate from ART/1000 (unbroken lines), national birth rate/100 (dotted lines), and birth rate from ART/natural birth rate (%) (dashed lines).

Comparison of the clinical pregnancy rate per transfer between the size of ART centers in Thailand in 2008–2014

YearCyclesNo. of centersTotal cyclesPregnancies/transfer cycle (%)P*OR (95% CI)
2008<1002279728.011
100–400111,95335.31<0.011.41 (1.18, 1.69)
>400287228.010.991.0 (0.81, 1.24)
2009<1001645434.041
100–400162,96235.660.531.06 (0.87, 1.32)
>40053,06534.570.851.02 (0.83, 1.25)
2010<100231,13932.891
100–400112,37036.670.031.18 (1.02, 1.37)
>400297831.960.660.96 (0.80, 1.15)
2011<100221,04530.861
100–400122,38434.480.041.19 (1.01, 1.39)
>40031,72617.83<0.010.48 (0.4, 0.58)
2012<1001973631.521
100–400173,43834.010.21.12 (0.94, 1.33)
>40031,7078.7<0.010.21 (0.16, 0.26)
2013<1001861833.321
100–400203,54630.79<0.011.66 (1.37, 1.96)
>40042,26033.010.880.99 (0.81, 1.19)
2014<100271,29431.041
100–400162,90041.14<0.011.55 (1.34, 1.78)
>40042,14240.35<0.011.50 (1.29, 1.74)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/abm-2019-0060 | Journal eISSN: 1875-855X | Journal ISSN: 1905-7415
Language: English
Page range: 189 - 196
Published on: Jun 4, 2020
Published by: Chulalongkorn University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

© 2020 Charoenchai Chiamchanya, Kamthorn Pruksananonda, published by Chulalongkorn University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.