
Figure 1
Few representative molecules from the second- and third-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotics are used in this study.

Figure 2
Absorbance of E. coli(a, b) and MRSA (c, d) with increasing concentration of AuNPs (2.87 nM) (a, c) and AgNPs (0.124 nM) (b, d) from 0 to 100 μl with 10 μl increments.

Figure 3
Absorbance of E. coli(a, b) and MRSA (c, d) in the absence of drug or nanoparticles (control), in the presence of drug only (ciprofloxacin) and by varying concentrations of AuNPs (2.87 nM) (a, c) and AgNPs (0.124 nM) (b, d) from 10 to 100 μl.

Figure 4
Absorbance of E. coli(a, b) and MRSA (c, d) in the absence of drug or nanoparticles (control), in the presence of drug only (levofloxacin) and by varying concentrations of AuNPs (2.87 nM) (a, c) and AgNPs (0.124 nM) (b, d) from 10 to 100 μl.

Figure 5
Absorbance of E. coli(a, b) and MRSA (c, d) in the absence of drug or nanoparticles (control), in the presence of drug only (norfloxacin) and by varying concentrations of AuNPs (2.87 nM) (a, c) and AgNPs (0.124 nM) (b, d) from 10 to 100 μl.

Figure 6
Absorbance of E. coli(a,b) and MRSA (c, d) in the absence of drug or nanoparticles (control), in the presence of drug only (ofloxacin) and by varying concentrations of AuNPs (2.87 nM) (a, c) and AgNPs (0.124 nM) (b,d) from 10 to 100 μl.

Figure 7
Absorbance of E. coli(a, b) and MRSA (c, d) in the absence of drug or nanoparticles (control), in the presence of drug only (pefloxacin) and by varying concentrations of AuNPs (2.87 nM) (a, c) and AgNPs (0.124 nM) (b, d) from 10 to 100 μl.
Table 2
Comparison of antibacterial effects of various antibiotic – NP conjugates against E. coli and S. aureus
| Fluoroquinolone–NP hybrids | Escherichia coli AgNPs | Escherichia coli AuNPs | Staphylococcus aureus AgNPs | Staphylococcus aureus AuNPs | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No drug (NPs only) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ciprofloxacin |
|
|
|
|
|
| Levofloxacin |
|
|
|
|
|
| Norfloxacin |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ofloxacin |
|
|
|
|
|
| Pefloxacin |
|
|
|
|
|