Effect of distraction task on driving performance of experienced taxi drivers

Seo, Sang-Hyeok; Kwak, Seung-Hyun; Chung, Soon-Cheol; Kim, Hyung-Sik; Min, Byung-Chan

doi:10.1515/abm-2018-0003

Abstract

Background

Driving performance is influenced by human, vehicular, and environmental factors.

Objectives

To investigate the effects of distraction tasks, such as sending a text message (STM) and searching a navigation device (SN), on the driving performance of experienced taxi drivers.

Methods

Twelve male taxi drivers (age: 56.3 ± 4.4 y; experience: 28.4 ± 6.4 y) and 14 female taxi drivers (age: 55.5 ± 3.5 y; experience: 19.4 ± 5.0 y) drove in a simulator at a constant speed (90 km/h) for 2 min while maintaining a gap of 30 m from the car in front, also traveling at 90 km/h. Participants were instructed to drive only for the first 1 min (control phase). For an additional 1 min (task phase), they were instructed to drive only, drive + STM, or drive + SN.

Results

Compared with driving only, during driving + STM or driving + SN, the drivers’ skin conductance level was relatively increased, suggesting that the distraction task increased the drivers’ workload and sympathetic nervous system activity. Compared with driving only, during driving + STM or driving + SN, the average distance from the car in front, speed deviation, and anterior–posterior and medial–lateral coefficients of variation increased, suggesting that maintaining the instructed gap and speed, and the longitudinal and transverse control of the car, was more difficult because of the distraction task.

Conclusions

Even for highly experienced taxi drivers, distraction tasks increased workload, increased the difficulty of vehicle control, and detracted from safe driving.

References

Anttila V, Luoma J. Surrogate in-vehicle information system and driver behaviour in an urban environment: a field study on the effects of visual and cognitive load. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2005; 8:121–33.10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee YT, Kim MH, Son JW. Effects of advancing age on driver’s cognitive workload. Ergon Soc Korea. 2009; 28:73–9.10.5143/JESK.2009.28.3.073
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee WS, Park JW, Kim SJ, Yoon SH, Yang X, Lee YT, et al. Development of an analysis system for biosignal and driving performance measurements. Ergon Soc Korea. 2010; 29:47–53.10.5143/JESK.2010.29.1.047
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ascone D, Lindsey T, Varghese C. An examination of driver distraction as recorded in NHTSA databases. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT [on line]. 2009 Sep. (No. HS-811 216), Available from: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811216.pdf. Accessed January 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Neale VL, Petersen A, Lee SE, Sudweeks JD, et al. The 100-car naturalistic driving study: phase II-Results of the 100-car field experiment. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration DOT [on line]. 2006 Apr. (No. HS-810 593) Available from: http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/Multimedia/PDFs/Crash%20Avoidance/Driver%20Distraction/100CarMain.pdf. Accessed January 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Neale VL, Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Sudweeks J, Goodman M. An overview of the 100-car naturalistic study and findings (05-0400). Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles; 2005 June 6–9, 2005; Washington DC, USA. Available from: http://www.dot.alaska.gov/highwaysafety/assets/Occ_Prot-cellphone_National_study-Virginia_Tech_Transp_Institute.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brumby DP, Salvucci DD, Howes A. Focus on driving: how cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while driving. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2009 April 4–9; Boston, USA. pp. 1629–38.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Choi SH, Lee JS. The effects of cellular-phone use on driving performance under various driving speed conditions. Korean J Sci Emotion Sensibility. 2006; 6:1–11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Haigney DE, Taylor RG, Westerman SJ. Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2000; 3:113–21.10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00020-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee SW. Differential effects of in-vehicle electronic device usage types on driver’s attentional distraction and driving performance. MSc thesis, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shin YK, Lim PN, Kang SC. The effects of in vehicle watching TV on driver behavior. Korean Soc Transport. 2006; 24:103–12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shin YK, Ryu JB. The effect of operating telematics device in vehicle on driver behaviors. Korean Soc Transport. 2008; 26:39–47.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Strayer DL, Drews FA, Crouch DJ, Johnson WA. Why do cell phone conversations interfere with driving? In: Walker WR, Herrmann DJ, editors. Cognitive technology: essays on the transformation of thought and society. Jefferson, NC, USA: McFarland and Company; 2005, p. 51–68.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mun KR, Choi JS, Kang DW, Bang YH, Kim HS, Lee SJ, et al. The effects of secondary task on driving performance: control of vehicle and analysis of motion signal. Korean J Sci Emotion Sensibility. 2010; 13:613–20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Choi YI, Park KS, Eum KS. The Effects of concentration level of telephone conversation on the automobile driver’s performance. KSCE Civil Eng. 2007; 27:165–69.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collet C, Clarion A, Morel M, Chapon A, Petit C. Physiological and behavioural changes associated to the management of secondary tasks while driving. Appl Ergon. 2009; 40:1041–46.1924901210.1016/j.apergo.2009.01.007
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kim YS. A study on driver distraction using a driving simulator. MSc, Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea, 2010.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koo TY, Kim BY, Ji SH, Suh MW. A study on workload of using telematics while driving. Trans Korean Soc Automot Eng. 2009; 17:26–33.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yang JW, Lee SJ, Kim JH, Choi MH, Choi JS, Kim HS, et al. Effects of sending text message and searching navigation on skin conductance level and deviation of vehicle speed during driving. J Soc Korea Ind Syst Eng. 2011; 34:9–14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wester AE, Bocker KB, Volkerts ER, Verster JC, Kenemans JL. Event-related potentials and secondary task performance during simulated driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2008; 40:1–7.10.1016/j.aap.2007.02.01418215526
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merat N, Anttila V, Luoma J. Comparing the driving performance of average and older drivers: the effect of surrogate in-vehicle information systems. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2005; 8:147–66.10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.011
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Summala H. Accident risk and driver behavior. Saf Sci. 1996; 22:103–17.10.1016/0925-7535(96)00009-4
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bellet T, Bailly-Asuni B, Mayenobe P, Banet A. A theoretical and methodological framework for studying and modelling drivers’ mental representations. Saf Sci. 2009; 47:1205–21.10.1016/j.ssci.2009.03.014
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hickman JS, Hanowski RJ, Bocanegra J. Distraction in commercial trucks and buses: assessing prevalence and risk in conjunction with crashes and near-crashes. Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-049. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration; 2010 Sept. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.173.3995.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article