Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Fusion of Robotics and Imaging: A Vision of the Future Cover

The Fusion of Robotics and Imaging: A Vision of the Future

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Dupont P, Nelson B, Goldfarb M, et al. A decade retrospective of medical robotics research from 2010 to 2020. Sci Robot. 2021 Nov 10;6(60):eabi8017. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abi8017
  2. Silvera-Tawil D. Robotics in Healthcare: A Survey. SN Comput Sci. 2024 Jan 11;5(1):189. doi: 10.1007/s42979-023-02551-0
  3. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988 Feb;35(2):153-60. doi: 10.1109/10.1354
  4. Shi D, Zhang W, Zhang W, Ding X. A Review on Lower Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Robots. Chin J Mech Eng. 2019 Aug 30; 32:74. doi: 10.1186/s10033-019-0389-8
  5. Kaiser MS, Mamun SA, Mahmud M, Tania MH. Healthcare robots to Combat COVID-19. Singapore: Springer; 2021 Jan . p. 14.
  6. Özkil AG, Fan Z, Dwids S, Aanaæs H, Kristensen JK, Christensen KH. Service robots for hospitals: a case study of transportation tasks in a hospital. Presented at: IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics. Shenyang, China; 2009 Aug 5-7. doi: 10.1109/ICAL.2009.5262912
  7. Fragapane G, Hvolby HH, Sgarbossa F, Strandhagen JO. Autonomous Mobile Robots in Hospital Logistics. In: Lalic B, Majstorovic V, Marjanovic U, von Cieminski G, Romero D, editors. Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Digital Transformation and Innovation of Production Management Systems. APMS 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. 2020 Aug 25;591:672-679. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57993-7_76
  8. Lengyel BC, Chinnadurai P, Corr SJ, Lumsden AB, Bavare CS. Robot-assisted vascular surgery: literature review, clinical applications, and future perspectives. J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 23;18(1):328. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02087-2
  9. Huang S, Lou C, Zhou Y, et al. MRI-guided robot intervention—current state-of-the-art and new challenges. Med-X. 2023 Jul 11;1:4. doi: 10.1007/s44258-023-00003-1
  10. Lin Z, Lei C, Yang L. Modern Image-Guided Surgery: A Narrative Review of Medical Image Processing and Visualization. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Dec 16;23(24):9872. doi: 10.3390/s23249872
  11. Kilmer E, Chen J, Ge J, et al. Towards fluorescence-guided autonomous robotic partial nephrectomy on novel tissue-mimicking hydrogel phantoms. Robotics. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.02265
  12. Wijsmuller AR, Romagnolo LGC, Consten E, Melani AGF, Marescaux J. Navigation and Image-Guided Surgery. In: Atallah S, editor. Digital Surgery. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2021; p. 137-144.
  13. Lanza C, Carriero S, Buijs EFM, et al. Robotics in Interventional Radiology: Review of Current and Future Applications. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec:22:15330338231152084. doi: 10.1177/15330338231152084
  14. Sloan AE, Ahluwalia MS, Valerio-Pascua J, et al. Results of the NeuroBlate System first-in-humans Phase I clinical trial for recurrent glioblastoma: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;118(6):1202-19. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.JNS1291
  15. Patel NA, Nycz CJ, Carvalho PA, et al. An Integrated Robotic System for MRI-Guided Neuroablation: Preclinical Evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Oct;67(10):2990-2999. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2974583
  16. Tavakkolmoghaddam F, Rajamani DK, Szewczyk B, et al. NeuroPlan: A Surgical Planning Toolkit for an MRI-Compatible Stereotactic Neurosurgery Robot. Int Symp Med Robot. 2021 Nov:2021. doi: 10.1109/ismr48346.2021.9661581
  17. Sutherland GR, Lama S, Gan LS, Wolfsberger S, Zareinia K. Merging machines with microsurgery: clinical experience with neuroArm. J Neurosurg. 2013 Mar;118(3):521-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.11.JNS12877
  18. Abdelaziz M, Kundrat D, Pupillo M, et al. Toward a Versatile Robotic Platform for Fluoroscopy and MRI-Guided Endovascular Interventions: A Pre-Clinical Study. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2019 Nov 8;5411-5418. doi: 10.1109/IROS40897.2019.8968237
  19. d’Almeida JF, Shrand JA, Garrow S, et al. Toward Low-Field MRI Guided Robotic Transurethral Focal Prostate Resection: A Feasibility Study Using High-Field Images. Presented at: 2025 International Symposium on Medical Robotics. Atlanta, GA; 2025 May. doi: 10.1109/ISMR67322.2025.11025965
  20. Ma X, Zhang X, Wang Y, et al. Feasibility of Pointcloud-based Ultrasound-CT Registration towards Automated, Robot-Assisted Image-Guidance in Spine Surgery. Presented at: 2024 International Symposium on Medical Robotics. Atlanta, GA; 2024. doi: 10.1109/ISMR63436.2024.10586071
  21. Norouzi A, Rahim MSM, Altameem A, et al. Medical Image Segmentation Methods, Algorithms, and Applications. IETE Technical Review. 2014 Jun 23;31(3):199-213. doi: 10.1080/02564602.2014.906861
  22. Fried I, Hoelscher J, Akulian JA, Pizer S, Alterovitz R. Landmark Based Bronchoscope Localization for Needle Insertion Under Respiratory Deformation. Rep U S. 2023 Oct:2023:6593-6600. doi: 10.1109/iros55552.2023.10342115
  23. Lee LK, Liew SC. Thong WJ. A Review of Image Segmentation Methodologies in Medical Image. In: Advanced Computer and Communication Engineering Technology: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Communication and Computer Engineering. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2015. p. 1069-1080.
  24. Sharma N, Aggarwal LM. Automated medical image segmentation techniques. J Med Phys. 2010 Jan;35(1):3-14. doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.58777
  25. Liu X, Song L, Liu S, Zhang Y. A Review of Deep-Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation Methods. Sustainability. 2021 Jan 25;13(3):1224. doi: 10.3390/su13031224
  26. Azad R, Aghdam EK, Rauland A, et al. Medical Image Segmentation Review: The Success of U-Net. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2024 Dec;46(12):10076-10095. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3435571
  27. De Fauw J, Ledsam JR, Romera-Paredes B, et al. Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nat Med. 2018 Sep;24(9):1342-1350. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0107-6
  28. Bernard O, Lalande A, Zotti C, et al. Deep Learning Techniques for Automatic MRI Cardiac Multi-Structures Segmentation and Diagnosis: Is the Problem Solved? IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Nov;37(11):2514-2525. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2837502
  29. Nikolov S, Blackwell S, Zverovitch A, et al. Clinically Applicable Segmentation of Head and Neck Anatomy for Radiotherapy: Deep Learning Algorithm Development and Validation Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e26151. doi: 10.2196/26151
  30. Isensee F, Kickingereder P, Wick W, et al. Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiomics Survival Prediction: Contribution to the BRATS 2017 Challenge. Presented at: Third International Workshop Brainlesion Glioma Mult. Scler. Stroke Traumatic Brain Injuries. Quebec City, QC, Canada: Springer. 2018 Sep 14. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.10508
  31. Wasserthal J, Breit HC, Meyer MT, et al. TotalSegmentator: Robust Segmentation of 104 Anatomic Structures in CT Images. Radiol Artif Intell. 2023 Jul 5;5(5):e230024. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230024
  32. D’Antonoli TA, Berger LK, Indrakanti AK, et al. TotalSegmentator MRI: Robust Sequence-independent Segmentation of Multiple Anatomic Structures in MRI. Radiology. 2025 Feb;314(2):e241613. doi: 10.1148/radiol.241613
  33. Github.com [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: GitHub; c2025. Wasserth J. TotalSegmentator. Tool for robust segmentation of >100 important anatomical structures in CT and MR images; 2005 Jun [cited 2025 Aug 18]. Available from: https://github.com/wasserth/TotalSegmentator/tree/master?tab=readme-ov-file
  34. arXiv [Internet]. New York, NY: Cornell University; c2025. Kirilov A, Mintun E, Ravi N, et al. Segment Anything; 2023 Apr 5 [cited 2025 Aug 29]. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.02643
  35. arXiv [Internet]. New York, NY: Cornell University; c2025. Ravi N, Gabeur V, Hu YT, et al. SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos. 2024 Aug [cited 2025 Aug 18]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00714
  36. Ma J, He Y, Li F, Han L, You C, Wang B. Segment anything in medical images. Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 22;15(1):654. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44824-z
  37. Smit JN, Kuhlmann KFD, Ivashchenko OV, et al. Ultrasound-based navigation for open liver surgery using active liver tracking. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Oct;17(10):1765-1773. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02659-3
  38. Yang X, Kwitt R, Styner M, Niethammer M. Quicksilver: Fast predictive image registration - A deep learning approach. Neuroimage. 2017 Sep:158:378-396. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.008
  39. Cao X, Yang J, Zhang J, et al. Deformable Image Registration based on Similarity-Steered CNN Regression. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2017 Sep:10433:300-308. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_35
  40. Cao X, Yang J, Zhang J, Wang Q, Yap PT, Shen D. Deformable Image Registration Using a Cue-Aware Deep Regression Network. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Sep;65(9):1900-1911. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2822826
  41. Fan J, Cao X, Yap PT, Shen D. BIRNet: Brain image registration using dual-supervised fully convolutional networks. Med Image Anal. 2019 May:54:193-206. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.03.006
  42. Rohé MM, Datar M, Heimann T, Sermesant M, Pennec X. SVF-Net: learning deformable image registration using shape matching. Lecture notes at: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; 2017 Sep. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_31
  43. Eppenhof KAJ, Pluim JPW. Pulmonary CT Registration Through Supervised Learning With Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 May;38(5):1097-1105. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2878316
  44. Yao Z, Feng H, Song Y, et al. A supervised network for fast image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) registration. J Med Syst. 2019 May 22;43(7):194. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1256-y
  45. arXiv [Internet]. New York, NY: Cornell University; c2025. Yan P, Xu S, Rastinehad AR, Wood BJ. Adversarial Image Registration with Application for MR and TRUS Image Fusion; 2018 Apr 30 [cited 2025 Aug 18]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.11024
  46. Blendowski M, Bouteldja N, Heinrich MP. Multimodal 3D medical image registration guided by shape encoder-decoder networks. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Feb;15(2):269-276. doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-02089-8
  47. Balakrishnan G, Zhao A, Sabuncu MR, Guttag J, Dalca AV. VoxelMorph: A Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image Registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Feb 4. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2897538
  48. Hering A, Kuckertz S, Heldmann S, Heinrich MP. Enhancing label-driven deep deformable image registration with local distance metrics for state-of-the-art cardiac motion tracking. Presented at: Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin. 2019 Feb 7;309-14. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-25326-4_69
  49. de Vos BD, Berendsen FF, Viergever MA, Sokooti H, Staring M, Išgum I. A deep learning framework for unsupervised affine and deformable image registration. Med Image Anal. 2019 Feb:52:128-143. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.11.010
  50. arXiv [Internet]. New York, NY: Cornell University; c2025. Qin C, Shi B, Liao R, Mansi T, Rueckert D, Kamen A 2019 Unsupervised deformable registration for multi-modal images via disentangled representations; 2019 [cited 2025 Aug 19]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.09331
  51. Fu Y, Lei Y, Wang T, et al. LungRegNet: An unsupervised deformable image registration method for 4D-CT lung. Med Phys. 2020 Apr;47(4):1763-1774. doi: 10.1002/mp.14065
  52. Xu Y, Meng C, Li Y, Li N, Ren L, Xia K. A Self-supervised 3D/2D Registration Method for Incomplete DSA Vessels. BECB. 2023 Feb 2;13-31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-25191-7_2
  53. Saderi M, Patel JH, Sheagren CD, Csőre J, Roy TL, Wright GA. 3D CT to 2D X-ray image registration for improved visualization of tibial vessels in endovascular procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025 Apr;20(4):753-763. doi: 10.1007/s11548-024-03302-z
  54. Esmed.org [Internet]. Geneva: Switzerland; European Society of Medicine; c2025. Sugimoto M, Sueyoshi T. Development of Holoeyes Holographic Image-Guided Surgery and Telemedicine System: Clinical Benefits of Extended Reality (Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality), The Metaverse, and Artificial Intelligence in Surgery, with A Systematic Review; 2023 Jul [cited 2025 Aug 18]. Available from: 10.18103/mra.v11i7.1.4045
  55. Lauinger AR, McNicholas M, Bramlet M, et al. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024 Nov;11(6):062608. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.6.062608
  56. Tene T, López DFV, Aguirre PEV, Puente LMO, Gomez CV. Virtual reality and augmented reality in medical education: an umbrella review. Front Digit Health. 2024 Mar 14:6:1365345. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1365345
  57. FDA [Internet]. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration; c2025. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Medical Devices; 2023 Sep [cited 2025 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/augmented-reality-and-virtual-reality-medical-devices
  58. Pruthi A, Alexander T, Mengaliyeva A, Kota N, Koneru M. Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Spinal Interventions: Current Use and Future Directions. Cureus. 2025 Mar 5;17(3):e80119. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80119
  59. Ponzoni, Bertelli F, Yoo SJ, et al. Mixed reality for preoperative planning and intraoperative assistance of surgical correction of complex congenital heart defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Aug;170(2):327-335.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.12.034
  60. Howe RD, Matsuoka Y. Robotics for surgery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 1999:1:211-40. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.211
  61. Satava RM. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Feb;12(1):6-16. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200202000-00002
  62. Simaan N, Yasin RM, Wang L. Medical Technologies and Challenges of Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Intervention and Diagnostics. Annu Rev Control Robot Auton Syst. 2018 Jul 10;465-490. doi: 10.1146/annurev-control-060117-104956
  63. Aikawa M, Oshima Y, Kato T, et al. Comparative study of senhance digital laparoscopy system and Da Vinci surgical system in liver resection. HPB. 2024 Jan;26:S244. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.03.482
  64. Lin YC, Yuan LH, Tseng CS, et al. Comparison of senhance and da vinci robotic radical prostatectomy: short-term outcomes, learning curve, and cost analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Mar;27(1):116-121. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00717-8
  65. Mendes Pereira V, Rice H, De Villiers L, et al. Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the CorPath GRX robotic system in endovascular embolization procedures of cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Mar 14;16(4):405-411. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020161
  66. Shaikh ZA, Eilenberg MF, Cohen TJ. The Amigo™ Remote Catheter System: From Concept to Bedside. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2017 Aug 15;8(8):2795-2802. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2017.080806
  67. Salcudean SE, Moradi H, Black DG, Navab N. Robot-Assisted Medical Imaging: A Review. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2022 Jul;110(7):951-967. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2022.3162840
  68. Li K, Xu Y, Meng MQH. An Overview of Systems and Techniques for Autonomous Robotic Ultrasound Acquisitions. T-MRB. 2021 May;3,(2):510-524. doi: 10.1109/TMRB.2021.3072190
  69. Santos L, Cortesão R. Computed-torque control for robotic-assisted tele-echography based on perceived stiffness estimation. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2018 Jul;15(3). doi: 10.1109/TASE.2018.2790900
  70. Wang J, Peng C, Zhao Y, et al. Application of a Robotic Tele-Echography System for COVID-19 Pneumonia. J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Feb;40(2):385-390. doi: 10.1002/jum.15406
  71. Abolmaesumi P, Salcudean SE, Zhu W, Sirouspour MR, DiMaio SP. Image-guided control of a robot for medical ultrasound. IEEE Trans Robot Automat. 2002 Mar;18(1):11-23. doi: 10.1109/70.988970
  72. De Schutter J, De Laet T, Rutgeerts J, et al. Constraint-based Task Specification and Estimation for Sensor-Based Robot Systems in the Presence of Geometric Uncertainty. Int J Robot Res. 2007 May;26(5):433-455. doi: 10.1177/027836490707809107
  73. Zettinig O, Frisch B, Virga S, et al. 3D ultrasound registration-based visual servoing for neurosurgical navigation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Sep;12(9):1607-1619. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1536-2
  74. Kojcev R, Khakzar A, Fuerst B, et al. On the reproducibility of expert-operated and robotic ultrasound acquisitions. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Jun;12(6):1003-1011. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1561-1
  75. Yang C, Jiang M, Chen M, et al. Autonomous robotic ultrasound scanning system: a key to enhancing image analysis reproducibility and observer consistency in ultrasound imaging. Front Robot AI. 2025 Feb 5;12:1527686. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1527686
  76. Ning G, Zhang X, Liao H. Autonomic Robotic Ultrasound Imaging System Based on Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Sep;68(9):2787-2797. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3054413
  77. Toporek G, Wang H, Balicki M, Xie H. Autonomous image-based ultrasound probe positioning via deep learning. Presented at: The Hamlyn Symposium; 2018 Jun. doi: 10.31256/HSMR2018.37
  78. Huang Y, Xiao W, Wang C, Liu H, Huang R, Sun Z. Towards fully autonomous ultrasound scanning robot with imitation learning based on clinical protocols. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2021 Apr;6(2):36713678.
  79. Fieselmann A, Steinbrener J, Jerebko A, et al. Twin robotic X-ray system for 2D radiographic and 3D cone-beam CT imaging. Presented at: SPIE Medical Imaging; 2016 Mar. doi: 10.1117/12.2212242
  80. Pekel E, Schaff F, Dierolf M, Pfeiffer F, Lasser T. Geometric calibration of seven degree of freedom robotic sample holder for x-ray CT. Presented at: Seventh International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography; 2022 Oct 17. doi: 10.1117/12.2646492
  81. Nir G, Machan LS, Donnellan F, et al. Automatic detection and tracking of the region of interest during fluoroscopy-guided procedures for radiation exposure reduction. Proceedings of the SPIE; 2021 Feb 15;1159828;6. doi: 10.1117/12.2580729
  82. Cepolina F, Razzoli R. Review of robotic surgery platforms and end effectors. J Robotic Surg. 2024 Feb 13;18(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01781-x
  83. Kuntz A, Emerson M, Ertop TE, et al. Autonomous medical needle steering in vivo. Sci Robot. 2023 Sep 20;8(82):eadf7614. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.adf7614
  84. Joglekar N, Liu F, Richter F, Yip MC. Autonomous Image-to-Grasp Robotic Suturing Using Reliability-Driven Suture Thread Reconstruction. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 2025 Apr;10(4):3676-3683. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2025.3544960
  85. Özsoy E, Czempiel T, Örnek EP, Eck U, Tombari F, Navab N. Holistic OR domain modeling: a semantic scene graph approach. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024 May;19(5):791-799. doi: 10.1007/s11548-023-03022-w
  86. Ong CS, Obey NT, Zheng Y, Cohan A, Schneider EB. SurgeryLLM: a retrieval-augmented generation large language model framework for surgical decision support and workflow enhancement. NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Dec 18;7(1):364. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01391-3
  87. Pressman SM, Borna S, Gomez-Cabello CA, Haider SA, Haider CR, Forte AJ. Clinical and Surgical Applications of Large Language Models: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2024 May 22;13(11):3041. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113041
  88. Bugaj M, Kliestik T, Lăzăroiu G. Generative Artificial Intelligence-based Diagnostic Algorithms in Disease Risk Detection, in Personalized and Targeted Healthcare Procedures, and in Patient Care Safety and Quality. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice. 2023 Jul 30;15(1):9-26. doi: 10.22381/CRLSJ15120231
  89. Song M, Ni Z, Liu S, Xie X. Semantic-aware Graph Reasoning and Guidance for Surgical Scene Understanding. Presented at: 2024 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Electromechanical Automation (AIEA), Shenzhen, China, 2024 Jun. doi: 10.1109/AIEA62095.2024.10692745
  90. Wagner L, Jourdan S, Mayer L, et al. Robotic scrub nurse to anticipate surgical instruments based on real-time laparoscopic video analysis. Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Aug 2;4(1):156. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00581-0
  91. arXiv [Internet]. New York, NY: Cornell University; c2025. Li S, Wang J, Dai R, et al. RoboNurse-VLA: Robotic Scrub Nurse System based on Vision-Language-Action Model; 2024 Sep [cited 2025 Aug 29]. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.19590
  92. Longo L, Brcic M, Cabitza F, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A manifesto of open challenges and interdisciplinary research directions. Information Fusion. 2024 Jun;106:102301. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102301
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcvj.1663 | Journal eISSN: 1947-6108
Language: English
Page range: 81 - 92
Submitted on: Jun 23, 2025
Accepted on: Aug 13, 2025
Published on: Oct 7, 2025
Published by: Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Carlos Quintero-Peña, Austin R. Shelton, Stuart J. Corr, Alan B. Lumsden, published by Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.