Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Role of Imaging and Biomarkers in Identifying, Monitoring, and Promoting Myocardial Recovery Cover

Role of Imaging and Biomarkers in Identifying, Monitoring, and Promoting Myocardial Recovery

Open Access
|Aug 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Overview of imaging modalities and biomarkers to predict reverse remodeling. CMR: cardiac magnetic resonance; GLS: global longitudinal strain; LA: left atrial; LGE: late gadolinium enhancement; LV: left ventricular; LVEDV: left ventricular end diastolic volume; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESV: left ventricular end systolic volume; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; ST2: suppression of tumorigenicity 2; RR: reverse remodeling

MARKER(PATHO)PHYSIOLOGYPREDICTOR
Imaging modalities
Echocardiography
LV GLSDeformation characteristics of the myocardium; limit dependence on LV volumesGLS ≤ 16%: increased risk for decrease in LVEF during follow-up
LA GLSIncreased LV filling pressures are transmitted backwards and will lead to LA enlargement, dysfunctionLA GLS > 10.8%; increased incidence of RR
Myocardial work quantificationIncorporation of strain with left ventricular pressure; less loading dependentGood correlation with fibrosis on CMR.
More research necessary
Cardiac magnetic resonance
LGEMarker to assess the degree of myocardial fibrosisLow LGE (cut-off < 7-8% of LV mass) and higher degree of myocardial edema; higher incidence of RR
No role in follow-up
Contractile reserveChange in LVEF after dobutamine administrationLarger change; higher incidence of RR
No correlation with degree of fibrosis
Biomarkers
NT-proBNPMarker of myocardial stress and stretch
  • No correlation between baseline levels and incidence of RR

  • Serial change; positively correlated with LVEDV, LVESV and negatively with LVEF

TroponinsMarker of myocyte injury and necrosis
  • Baseline: < 11 ng/L of highly sensitivity troponin T; higher incidence RR

  • Serial follow-up; decrease associated with lower incidence of cardiovascular events, but not associated with change in echocardiographic parameters

Soluble ST2Marker of fibrosis and hypertrophy
  • Levels > 48 ng/mL; low likelihood of RR

  • Serial follow-up: more time with sST2 levels < 35 ng/mL; higher likelihood of RR

Galectin-3Marker of macrophage activity, part of fibrosis processLevels < 20 ng/mL during follow-up; higher incidence of RR
No independent predictive value
Big endothelin-1Marker of vasoconstriction, hypertrophy and fibrosis resulting in adverse remodelingLower levels; higher likelihood of RR
Figure 1

Late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance image obtained in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Severe reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF 17%) with approximately 40% LGE in the left ventricle. Despite optimal medical therapy, no myocardial recovery was expected. Four years later, due to recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia, the patient was referred for left ventricular assist device.

Table 2

Highlight of research articles supporting different imaging modalities for the prediction of reverse remodeling. DCMP: dilated cardiomyopathy; LA: left atrial; LGE: late gadolinium enhancement; LVEDD: left ventricular end diastolic dimension; LVEDDi: left ventricular end diastolic dimension index; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; RR: reverse remodeling; GLS: global longitudinal strain; LVESD: left ventricular end-systolic diameter

AUTHOR, YEARSTUDY POPULATIONDEFINITION RROUTCOME/FINDING
Echocardiography
Ikeda et al. 201530N = 207, DCMP
  • Increase LVEF ≥ 10% or LVEF > 35%

  • Decrease in LVEDDi of ≥ 10%

LVEDDi decrease during the first 6 months was predictive for RR later on
Adamo et al. 201731N = 96, LVEF < 50%
  • Increase LVEF ≥ 10% or LVEF > 50%

Abnormal LV GLS (≤ 16%): predictor for LVEF decrease.
Normal LV GLS (> 16%): stable LVEF
Swat et al. 201832N = 166, DCMP
  • LVEF > 40% and ≥ 10% improvement

Baseline LV GLS > 8% in patients with LVESD > 43.5 mm associated with RR
Jung et al. 20209N = 160, DCMP
  • Increase LVEF > 10% or LVEF > 50%

  • Decrease in LVEDDi of ≥ 10% or LVEDDi ≤ 33 mm/m²

Baseline LV GLS (cut-off 10%) independent predictor RR in sinus rhythm
Torii et al. 202113N = 100, new onset HF
  • LVEF ≥ 40%

LA strain (cut-off 10.8%) independent predictor for RR
CMR
Kubanek et al. 201328N = 44, DCMP
  • Increase LVEF ≥ 10% or LVEF > 35%

  • Decrease in LVEDD of ≥ 10%

Baseline lower extent of LGE and greater myocardial edema ratio are independent predictors of RR
Masci et al. 201325N = 58, DCMP
  • Increase LVEF ≥ 10%

  • Decrease in LVEDV of ≥ 10%

LGE absence at baseline strong predictor for RR at 2 years follow-up
Kida et al. 201323N = 31, DCMP
  • Increase LVEF ≥ 10% and relative LVEDD reduction ≥ 10% or final LVEDD ≤ 33 mm/m²

LGE absence at baseline strong predictor for RR at 6 months follow-up
Ishii et al. 201627N = 66, DCMP
  • Absolute LVEF increase ≥ 10% (above > 35%) and relative percent LVEDD reduction ≥ 10%

LGE mass < 8% predicts RR
Chimura et al. 201726N = 129, DCMP
  • Increase LVEF ≥ 10% and relative LVEDV reduction ≥ 10%

LGE absence and GLS predict independently RR
Barison et al. 201821N = 71, DCMP
  • Increase LVEF ≥ 10% and relative LVEDV reduction ≥ 10%

LGE absence predicts RR
Figure 2

Different biomarkers according to their pathophysiological action.

Figure 3

sST2 and galectin-3 as markers of fibrosis. As a response to cardiac damage, macrophage activation results in the production of galectin-3, which leads to fibroblast activation and the release of IL-33. Normally, IL-33 binds to ST2L, by which it initiates an antihypertrophic an antifibrotic pathway. sST2 works as a decoy receptor, preventing the binding of IL-33 to ST2L. IL-33: interleukin-33; sST2: soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2; ST2L: suppression of tumorigenicity 2 ligand

Table 3

Highlights of research articles supporting different biomarkers for the prediction of reverse remodeling. CHF: chronic heart failure; HFrEF: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, LV: left ventricle; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDVi: left ventricular end-diastolic volume index, LVESVi: left ventricular end-systolic volume index; RR: reverse remodeling

AUTHOR, YEARSTUDY POPULATION (N)END POINTOUTCOME/FINDING
NT-proBNP
Weiner et al. 201335HFrEF (LVEF < 40%)
(N = 116)
Improvement in LVEF, LVEDVi, LVESViNT-proBNP measurement associated with RR
Gaggin et al. 201437HFrEF
(N = 151)
Clinical outcomeBaseline NT-proBNP predicts clinical outcome
Cho et al. 201860DCM and AHFLVEF ≥ 50%Decrease in NT-proBNP between initial presentation and discharge (> 1633.5 pg/mL), predictor for RR at 6 months
Daubert et al. 201961HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 40%)
(N = 268)
Improvements in LVESVi, LVEDVi, EF,NT-proBNP < 1,000 pg/mL associated with RR
Januzzi et al.
201962
HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 40%) with elevated natriuretic peptides
(N = 654)
Improvement in LVEF, LVEDVi, LVESViA decrease in NT-proBNP over time is associated with RR
Troponin
Sato et al. 200138DCM
(N = 60)
Improvement in LVEF, LVDdTnT levels during follow-up < 0.02 ng/mL are associated with RR
Chia et al. 200840STEMI
(N = 378)
Functional and clinical outcomeTnI at 72 hours > 55 ng/mL was associated with a large infarct size and low LVEF
Miller et al. 200963CHF
(N = 172)
Clinical outcomeElevated cTnT (> 0.01 ng/mL) are associated with increased risk of events
O’Connor et al. 201139AHF
(N = 288)
Clinical outcomePositive cTnT (> 0.03 ng/mL) are associated with a worse outcome
Felker et al. 201264ADHF
(N = 808)
Clinical outcomecTnI above 99% percentile predicts in-hospital outcome
Gaggin et al. 201437HFrEF
(N = 151)
Clinical outcomeBaseline Hs-TnT predicts outcome
Felker et al. 201565AHF
(N = 1074)
Clinical outcomeHs-cTnT are associated with worse outcome
Brooks et al. 201641LVEF ≤ 35% post-myocardial infarction
(N = 231)
Improvement in LVEFPeak troponin levels are associated with RR
Soluble ST2
Weinberg et al. 200345LVEF ≤ 30%
(N = 161)
Clinical outcomeChange in sST2 was associated with clinical outcome
Daniels et al. 201047Heart failure history, symptoms or risk factors (N = 588)1 year mortalitysST2 (> 28.25 ng/mL) independent predictor for 1 year mortality
Bayes-Genis et al. 201248CHF
(N = 891)
Clinical outcomesST2 associated with mortality
Gaggin et al. 201437HFrEF
(N = 151)
Improvement in LVEF, LVESVi, LVEDViSerial sST2 predicts RR
Ky et al. 201149HFrEF
(N = 1141)
Clinical outcomesST2 (> 36.3 ng/mL) associated with adverse outcome
Lupon et al. 201566LVEF < 40%
(N = 304)
LVEF increase with > 15%
LVEF increase with 10% + reduction of LVESDi > 20% or LVESVi ≥ 40%
sST2 levels < 48 ng/mL was associated with RR
Galectin-3
Tang et al. 201154HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 35%) (N = 178)Functional and clinical outcomeNo relation between baseline levels galectin-3 and echocardiographic indices; high levels associated with poor clinical outcome
Motiwala et al. 201351HFrEF
(N = 151)
Functional and clinical outcomeSerial follow-up with galectin-3 < 20 ng/L: associated with lower event rate and increase in LVEF
Lok et al. 201352HFrEF
(N = 240)
Functional and clinical outcomeGalectin-3 levels are associated with change in LVEDV and predictor of mortality
Weir et al. 201355HFrEF
(N = 100)
LV remodelingNo correlation between galectin-3 and RR
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcvj.1381 | Journal eISSN: 1947-6108
Language: English
Page range: 42 - 53
Submitted on: Mar 24, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 22, 2024
Published on: Aug 20, 2024
Published by: Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Evelyne Meekers, Matthias Dupont, published by Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.