Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Bhuvnesh Aggarwal; Wahaj Aman; Omar Jeroudi; Neal S. Kleiman

doi:10.14797/mdcj-14-1-23

Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal

Volume 14 (2018): Issue 1

By: Bhuvnesh Aggarwal, Wahaj Aman, Omar Jeroudi and Neal S. Kleiman

Open Access

|Jan 2018

Abstract

Due to advancing age and increasing comorbidities, the current population has a higher incidence of complex coronary artery disease, often without surgical options for revascularization. In this setting, hemodynamic support devices are an important adjunct in the interventionist’s toolbox as they allow for a safer, more effective procedure. The following paper reviews the indications of various available mechanical support devices, highlights their clinical data and technical parameters, and offers a practical approach towards appropriate patient and device selection.

References

Hochman JS , Sleeper LA , Webb JG , Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26; 341 9: 625– 34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Diepen S , Katz JN , Albert NM , Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Oct 17; 136 16: e232– e268.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nguyen HL , Yarzebski J , Lessard D , Gore JM , McManus DD , Goldberg RJ. Ten-Year (2001–2011) Trends in the Incidence Rates and Short-Term Outcomes of Early Versus Late Onset Cardiogenic Shock After Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 7; 6 6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goldberg RJ , Gore JM , Alpert JS , Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Incidence and mortality from a community-wide perspective, 1975 to 1988. N Engl J Med. 1991 Oct 17; 325 16: 1117– 22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Waldo SW , Secemsky EA , O'Brien C , Surgical ineligibility and mortality among patients with unprotected left main or multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2014 Dec 23; 130 25: 2295– 301.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gössl M , Faxon DP , Bell MR , Holmes DR , Gersh BJ. Complete versus incomplete revascularization with coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous intervention in stable coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1; 5 4: 597– 604.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nellis SH , Liedtke AJ , Whitesell L. Small coronary vessel pressure and diameter in an intact beating rabbit heart using fixed-position and free-motion techniques. Circ Res. 1981 Aug; 49 2: 342– 53.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fincke R , Hochman JS , Lowe AM , .; SHOCK Investigators Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 21; 44 2: 340– 8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thiele H , Smalling RW , Schuler GC. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2007 Sep; 28 17: 2057– 63.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Parissis H , Graham V , Lampridis S , Lau M , Hooks G , Mhandu PC. IABP: history-evolution-pathophysiology-indications: what we need to know. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Aug 4; 11 1: 122.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barron HV , Every NR , Parsons LS , .; Investigators in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 The use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Am Heart J. 2001 Jun; 141 6: 933– 9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ohman EM , Nanas J , Stomel RJ , Thrombolysis and counterpulsation to improve survival in myocardial infarction complicated by hypotension and suspected cardiogenic shock or heart failure: results of the TACTICS Trial. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2005 Feb; 19 1: 33– 9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perera D , Stables R , Thomas M , Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Aug 25; 304 8: 867– 74
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Patel MR , Smalling RW , Thiele H , Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and infarct size in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction without shock: the CRISP AMI randomized trial. JAMA. 2011 Sep 28; 306 12: 1329– 37.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Curtis JP , Rathore SS , Wang Y , Chen J , Nallamothu BK , Krumholz HM. Use and effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon pumps among patients undergoing high risk percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan; 5 1: 21– 30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Briguori C , Airoldi F , Chieffo A , Elective versus provisional intraaortic balloon pumping in unprotected left main stenting. Am Heart J. 2006 Sep; 152 3: 565– 72.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seyfarth M , Sibbing D , Bauer I , A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 4; 52 19: 1584– 8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ouweneel DM , Eriksen E , Sjauw KD , Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support versus intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 24; 69 3: 278– 87.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O'Neill WW , Kleiman NS , Moses J , A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study. Circulation. 2012 Oct 2; 126 14: 1717– 27.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schreiber T , Wah Htun W , Blank N , Real-world supported unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention with impella device; data from the USpella registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1; 90 4: 576– 581.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maini B , Naidu SS , Mulukutla S , Real-world use of the Impella 2.5 circulatory support system in complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the USpella Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov 1; 80 5: 717– 25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thiele H , Lauer B , Hambrecht R , Boudriot E , Cohen HA , Schuler G. Reversal of cardiogenic shock by percutaneous left atrial-to-femoral arterial bypass assistance. Circulation. 2001 Dec 11; 104 24: 2917– 22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burkhoff D , Cohen H , Brunckhorst C , O'Neill WW ; TandemHeart Investigators Group. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 2006 Sep; 152 3: 469.e1– 8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thiele H , Sick P , Boudriot E , Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2005 Jul; 26 13: 1276– 83.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alli OO , Singh IM , Holmes DR Jr , Pulido JN , Park SJ , Rihal CS. Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the Mayo Clinic experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov 1; 80 5: 728– 34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacLaren G , Combes A , Bartlett RH. Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult respiratory failure: life support in the new era. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Feb; 38 2: 210– 20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nichol G , Karmy-Jones R , Salerno C , Cantore L , Becker L. Systematic review of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock states. Resuscitation. 2006 Sep; 70 3: 381– 94.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Takayama H , Truby L , Koekort M , Clinical outcome of mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock in the current era. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Jan; 32 1: 106– 11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sheu JJ , Tsai TH , Lee FY , Early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention improved 30-day clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with profound cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep; 38 9: 1810– 7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Basir MB , Schreiber TL , Grines CL , Effect of Early Initiation of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Survival in Cardiogenic Shock. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15; 119 6: 845– 51.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O'Neill WW , Schreiber T , Wohns DH , The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry. J J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Feb; 27 1: 1– 11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Atkinson TM , Ohman EM , O'Neill WW , Rab T , Cigarroa JE ; Interventional Scientific Council of the American College of Cardiology. A Practical Approach to Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Interventional Perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 9; 9 9: 871– 83.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mathur M , Hira RS , Smith BM , Lombardi WL , McCabe JM. Fully Percutaneous Technique for Transaxillary Implantation of the Impella CP. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 13; 9 11: 1196– 8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-14-1-23 | Journal eISSN: 1947-6108

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 23 - 31

Published on: Jan 1, 2018

Published by: Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

mechanical circulatory support,

high-risk,

percutaneous coronary intervention,

cardiogenic shock,

stent,

coronary artery disease

© 2018 Bhuvnesh Aggarwal, Wahaj Aman, Omar Jeroudi, Neal S. Kleiman, published by Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.

Volume 14 (2018): Issue 1