Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Approaches to Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Device Design, Performance, and Limitations Cover

Approaches to Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Device Design, Performance, and Limitations

Open Access
|Jul 2017

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Percutaneous devices for left atrial appendage occlusion. (A) PLAATO device; (B) WATCHMAN device; (C) Amplatzer Amulet device; (D) LARIAT suture delivery device; (E) WaveCrest device; (F) LAmbre device.

Figure 2.

Deployment of a WATCHMAN device. (A) Initial left atrial appendage (LAA) angiogram obtained through a pigtail catheter inserted via a sheath in the LAA. (B) Sheath advancement into the LAA with the WATCHMAN inside. (C) Deployment of the WATCHMAN in the LAA. (D) LAA angiogram to verify position of initial deployment in the LAA neck. (E) Release of the WATCHMAN. (F) Final angiogram.

Figure 3.

Deployment of a LARIAT left atrial appendage (LAA) suture. (A) Initial LAA angiogram. (B) Endocardial and epicardial magnet-tipped wires snapped together. Balloon over endocardial wire aids in echocardiographic guidance. Snare has been advanced over the wires and is closed over the LAA. (C) Contrast injection in the left atrium shows complete occlusion. (D) After suture delivery, the snare is opened and retracted. Contrast injection shows a closed stump.

Language: English
Page range: 106 - 113
Published on: Jul 1, 2017
Published by: Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2017 Amish S. Dave, Miguel Valderrábano, published by Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.