Have a personal or library account? Click to login
For better or for worse: politics marries pop culture (TikTok and the 2022 Italian elections) Cover

For better or for worse: politics marries pop culture (TikTok and the 2022 Italian elections)

Open Access
|Apr 2023

References

  1. Almond, G. A., & Powell, G. B. (1978). Comparative Politics: System, Process and Policy. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown.
  2. Alexander, J. C. (2010). The performance of politics: Obama’s victory and the democratic struggle for power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. Amado, A. (2016). Política pop: De líderes populistas a telepresidentes. Buenos Aires: Ariel.
  4. Baranowski, M. (2019). Sociology of knowledge in times determined by knowledge. Society Register, 3(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2019.3.1.01
  5. Barile, N. (2014). Brand Renzi: Anatomia del politico come marca. Milano: Egea.
  6. Bentivegna, S. (2014). La politica in 140 caratteri. Twitter e spazio pubblico. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  7. Bentivegna, S. (2015). A colpi di tweet. La politica in prima persona. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  8. Blumenthal, S. (1980). The Permanent Campaign: Inside the World of Elite Political. Boston: Beacon Press.
  9. Boccia Artieri, G. (2012). Stati di connessione. Pubblici, cittadini e consumatori nella (Social) Network Society. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  10. Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale: Yale University Press.
  11. Bracciale, R. (2020). Sharing a Meme! Questioni di genere tra stereotipi e détournement. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 11(22), 91-102.
  12. Cacciotto, M. (2011). Storytelling e politica. Un binomio vincente? Comunicazione Politica, 3/2020. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  13. Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Campus, D. (2010). Mediatization and personalization of politics in Italy and France: The cases of Berlusconi and Sarkozy. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(2), 219-235.
  15. Campus, D. (2013). Women Political Leaders and the Media. Berlin: Springer.
  16. Ceccarini, L. (2015). La cittadinanza online. Il Mulino: Bologna.
  17. Cervi, L. y Marín-Lladó, C. (2021). What are political parties doing on TikTok? The Spanish case. Profesional de la información, 30(4), e300403. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.03
  18. Cervi, L., Tejedor, S. & Marín Lladó, C. (2021): TikTok and the new language of political communication: the case of Podemos. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación, 26, 267-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/clr.5817
  19. Ceccobelli, D. (2017). Facebook al potere. Lo stile della leadership al tempo dei social media. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli.
  20. Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), 9-41.
  22. Codeluppi, V. (2007). La vetrinizzazione sociale. Il processo di spettacolarizzazione degli individui e della società. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  23. Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Corner, J., & Pels, D. (2003). Media and Restyling of Politics. California: SAGE
  25. Cotta, M., Della Porta, D., & Morlino, L. (2001). Scienza Politica. Il Mulino: Bologna.
  26. Crellin, Z. (2020). Students have switched to online classes due to coronavirus and their TikToks are chaotic AF. Pedestrian TV.
  27. Dalton, J. R., & Wattenberg, M. P. (2003). Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
  28. D’Ambrosio,M. (2022). Emotions in political discourse and social narratives: sociological reflections on traditional and new media. Society Register, 6(4) 101-116. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2022.6.4.06
  29. Diamanti, I. (2014). Oltre la democrazia del pubblico. Comunicazione politica, 3, 581-590. doi: 10.3270/78586
  30. Diamanti, G. (2020). I segreti dell’urna. Torino: UTET Università.
  31. Díaz-Noci, J..(2010). Medios de comunicación en Internet: Algunas tendencias. El Profesional de la Información, 19(6), 561-567. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2010.nov.01
  32. De Blasio, E. & Sorice, M. (2014). Radicals, rebels and maybe beyond. Social movements, women’s leadership and the web 2.0 in the Italian political sphere. CMCS Working Papers, 1-60. Retrieved from https://iris.luiss.it/handle/11385/95781
  33. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (2001). Let us Infotain You: Politics in the New Media Environment. In L. W. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy (pp. 160-181). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  34. De Rosa, R. (2014). Cittadini digitali: L’agire politico al tempo dei social media. Milano: Apogeo.
  35. Enli, G. (2015). Mediated authenticity. How the media constructs reality. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  36. Easton, D. (1953). The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Knopf.
  37. Easter, M. (2020). It’s not just teens: We’re all in the TikTok-dance-challenge phase of quarantine now. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavirus/ct-ent-tiktok-dance-challenges-20200411-ypz43v7wr-5getm7sn5tcoycbzq-story.html
  38. Fernández-Castrillo, C. (2014). Prácticas transmedia en la era del prosumidor: Hacia una definición del contenido generado por el usuario (CGU). Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 19, 53-67. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CIYC.2014.v19.43903
  39. Freschi, A. C. & Mete, V. (2020). The electoral personalization of Italian mayors: A study of 25 years of direct election. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 50(2), 271-290.
  40. Gamir-Ríos, J. & Sánchez-Castillo, S. (2022). The political irruption of short video: Is TikTok a new window for Spanish parties? Communication & Society, 35(2), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.2.37-52
  41. Giacomini, G. (2018). Potere Digitale. Milano: Meltemi.
  42. Giansante, G. (2014). La comunicazione politica online. Come usare il web per costruire consenso e stimolare la partecipazione. Roma: Carocci.
  43. Gibson, R. K. & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63, 529-547.
  44. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
  45. Haasch, P. (2020). From Zoom detention to virtual gun violence—teens are making memes and TikToks about their online classes. Insider. Retrieved from https://www.insider.com/coronavirus-tiktok-memes-classes-cancelled-online-school-zoom-google-hangouts-2020-3.
  46. Holman, M. R., Schneider, M. C., & Pondel, K. (2015). Gender targeting in political advertisements. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 816-829.
  47. Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatisation of culture and society. London: Routledge.
  48. Jaramillo-Dent, D., Contreras-Pulido, P., & Pérez-Rodríguez, A. (2022). Immigrant Influencers on TikTok: Diverse Microcelebrity Profiles and Algorithmic (In)Visibility. Media and Communication, 10(1), 208-221. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4743
  49. Jones, J. P. (2005). Entertaining Politics. New Political Television and Civic Culture. Washington: Rowman and Littlefield.
  50. Kale, S. (2020). How coronavirus helped TikTok find its voice. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/apr/26/how-coronavirus-helped-tiktok-find-its-voice
  51. Langer, A. I. (2010). The politicization of private persona: Exceptional leaders or the new rule? The case of the United Kingdom and the Blair effect. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(1), 60-76.
  52. Li, Y., Guan, M.I., Hammond, P., & Berrey, L. (2021). Communicating Covid-19 information on TikTok: a content analysis of TikTok videos from official accounts featured in the Covid-19 information hub. Health education research, 36(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyab010
  53. López-Fernández, V. (2022). Nuevos medios en campaña. El caso de las elecciones autonómi- cas de Madrid 2021 en TikTok. Universitas-XXI. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 36, 221-241. https://doi.org/10.17163/uni.n36.2022.09
  54. Mancini, P. (2011). Leader, president, person: Lexical ambiguities and interpretive implications. European Journal of Communication, 26(1), 48-63.
  55. Marletti, C. (2010). La repubblica dei media. L’Italia dal politichese alla politica iperreale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  56. Mazzoleni, G. (2004). La comunicazione politica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  57. Mazzoleni, G. (2015). Towards an inclusive digital public sphere. Can the Media Serve Democracy? Essays in Honour of Jay G. Blumler (174-183). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  58. Mazzoleni, G. & Bracciale, R. (2019). La politica pop online: I meme e le nuove sfide della comunicazione politica. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  59. Mazzoleni, G. & Sfardini, A. (2009). Politica pop. Da Porta a porta a L’isola dei famosi. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  60. McQuail, D. (2012). Towards a Sociology Of Mass Communication. London: Macmillan.
  61. Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  62. Manin, B. (1995). Principes du gouvernement représentatif. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
  63. Manin, B. (2013). Principi del governo rappresentativo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  64. Nagle, A. (2017). Kill All Normies. Online Culture Wars from 4Chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. Portland: Zero Books.
  65. Novelli, E. (2018). Le campagne elettorali in Italia protagonisti, strumenti, teorie. Roma-Bari: Edizioni Laterza.
  66. Ortega Fernández, E. & Rodríguez Hernández, J. (2021). Estrategia de comunicación de los cuerpos de seguridad a través de píldoras audiovisuales en TikTok Policía Nacional y Guardia Civil en España. aDResearch ESIC International Journal of communication research, 25, 160-185. https://doi.org/10.7263/adresic-025-09
  67. Parisi, L., & Rega, R. (2010). La comunicazione degli attori politici: tra disintermediazione e media sociali. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  68. Palmieri, A. (2016). Internet e comunicazione politica. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  69. Postman, N. (1985). Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin Books.
  70. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon& Shuster.
  71. Rega, R., & Bracciale, R. (2018). La self-personalizzation dei leader politici su Twitter. Tra professionalizzazione e intimizzazione. The LAB’s Quarterly, 61-86.
  72. Rodríguez-Martínez, R., Codina, L., & Pedraza-Jiménez, R. (2012). Indicadores para la evaluación de la calidad en cibermedios: análisis de la interacción y de la adopción de la web 2.0. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35(1), 61-93. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.1.858
  73. Rothert, A.(2022). Emotional landscape of politics. Society Register, 6(4), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2022.6.4.04
  74. Sampedro, V. (2011). New Trends and Challengers in Political Communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 432-443.
  75. Sánchez Castillo, S. (2021). La construcción del liderazgo político y la identidad escenográfica en TikTok. In J. Sierra Sánchez & A. Barrientos Báez (Eds.), Cosmovisión de la comunicación en redes sociales en la era postdigital (pp. 215-227). Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España.
  76. Schudson, M. (1988). The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: The Free Press.
  77. Scolari,.C.A., Winocur, R., Pereira, S., & Barreneche, C. (2018). Alfabetismo transmedia. Una introducción. Comunicación y Sociedad, 33, 7-13.
  78. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
  79. Sorice, M. (2011). La comunicazione politica. Roma: Carocci.
  80. Sorice, M. (2009). Sociologia dei Mass media. Roma: Carocci.
  81. Stanyer, J. (2007). Modern Political Communication. Cambridge: Polity.
  82. Stanyer, J. & Wring, D. (2004). Public images, private lives: The mediation of politicians around the globe. Parliamentary Affairs, 57(1), 1-8.
  83. Stanyer, J. (2012). Intimate Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
  84. Street, J. (2001). Mass Media, Politics, and Democracy. London: Palgrave.
  85. Thompson, J. B. (1995). The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge: Polity.
  86. Van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the Citizen. When Politics and Popular Culture Converge. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  87. Ventura, S. (2019). I leader e le loro storie. Narrazione, comunicazione politica e crisi della democrazia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  88. Waisbord, S. R. (2020). Interrogating the Analytical Value of «Media System» for Comparative Political Communication. Comunicazione Politica, 21(1), 35-46.
  89. Way, A. K., & Malvini Redden, S. (2017). The study of youth online: A critical review and agenda. Review of Communication, 17(2), 119-136.
  90. Willingham, A. J. (2020). El encierro ha hecho de Tik Tok una manera divertida de unirse en familia. Cnn Espanol. Retrieved from https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2020/04/21/el-encierro-ha-hecho-de-tiktok-una-manera-divertida-para-unirse-en-familia/
  91. Zaller, J. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20, 109-130.
Language: English
Page range: 117 - 142
Submitted on: Feb 7, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 21, 2023
Published on: Apr 2, 2023
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Daniele Battista, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.