Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Changes in Erosion Processes and Morphology of Step-Pool Channels in the SKI Resort with Artificial Snowmaking, An Example from Gubałowskie Foothills Cover

Changes in Erosion Processes and Morphology of Step-Pool Channels in the SKI Resort with Artificial Snowmaking, An Example from Gubałowskie Foothills

Open Access
|Mar 2025

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Location of the study area: A – a regional overview, B – a hillshaded relief of the catchment with analysed channels. Channels are signed with CH and followed numbers. Important drainage lines and ski infrastructure are marked, and C – a photograph of the catchment with ski run 2 (photo: D. Piątek).
Location of the study area: A – a regional overview, B – a hillshaded relief of the catchment with analysed channels. Channels are signed with CH and followed numbers. Important drainage lines and ski infrastructure are marked, and C – a photograph of the catchment with ski run 2 (photo: D. Piątek).

Fig. 2.

Schematic diagram of selected measurements, black arrows and Greek letters show the way of measurement.
Schematic diagram of selected measurements, black arrows and Greek letters show the way of measurement.

Fig. 3.

Photographs of characteristic parts of analysed channels: A – a part of Channel 2 with traces of lateral and deep erosion, B – a part of Channel 4 with a relatively high gradient, C – a part of Channel 8 with a 0.6-m-high step below the rockfloor, D – a step with typical height for catchment, Channel 3, E – part of Channel 7, fulfilled with material from a small landslide visible in the left corner (photos: A. Gołąb and D. Piątek).
Photographs of characteristic parts of analysed channels: A – a part of Channel 2 with traces of lateral and deep erosion, B – a part of Channel 4 with a relatively high gradient, C – a part of Channel 8 with a 0.6-m-high step below the rockfloor, D – a step with typical height for catchment, Channel 3, E – part of Channel 7, fulfilled with material from a small landslide visible in the left corner (photos: A. Gołąb and D. Piątek).

Fig. 4.

Distinctive correlations in the group of all analysed channels (reach averaged data), A – hillslope gradient versus bed material size; B – channel gradient versus drainage area.
Distinctive correlations in the group of all analysed channels (reach averaged data), A – hillslope gradient versus bed material size; B – channel gradient versus drainage area.

Fig. 5.

Distinctive correlations in the group of channels without impact of ski runs (reach averaged data), A – hillslope gradient versus step clast size; B – step height versus step spacing.
Distinctive correlations in the group of channels without impact of ski runs (reach averaged data), A – hillslope gradient versus step clast size; B – step height versus step spacing.

Fig. 6.

Distinctive correlations in the group of channels affected by ski runs (reach averaged data), A – drainage area versus channel gradient; B – channel width versus number of steps.
Distinctive correlations in the group of channels affected by ski runs (reach averaged data), A – drainage area versus channel gradient; B – channel width versus number of steps.

Fig. 7.

Elevation changes in analysed channels in the period 2016–2023, in rectangle areas presented in Figure 8.
Elevation changes in analysed channels in the period 2016–2023, in rectangle areas presented in Figure 8.

Fig. 8.

Close up on areas with elevation changes marked with rectangles on Figure 7; A – close up on Channel 2, in red rings marked results of headward erosion; B – close up on Channel 8 with zones with erosion and deposition; and C – close up on a small landslide on hillslopes of Channel 4.
Close up on areas with elevation changes marked with rectangles on Figure 7; A – close up on Channel 2, in red rings marked results of headward erosion; B – close up on Channel 8 with zones with erosion and deposition; and C – close up on a small landslide on hillslopes of Channel 4.

Morphometry of analysed channels_ SD is the standard deviation_

Channel IDNumber of ReachesDrainage areaLengthChannel gradientHillslope gradientValley bottom widthChannel/active zone widthBed material sizeNumber of stepsStep heightStep height SDStep spacing (m)Step spacing SDStep clast size (mm)Step per channel lengthChannels with skiing impact
[km2][m][m · m−1][°][m][mm][–][m][–][m][–][mm][–][–]
130.01770.2726.751.970.6368280.3817.381.410.892200.36YES
250.021920.2435.482.740.9874690.3915.692.831.913800.34YES
350.142230.2435.391.801.8084500.412.434.052.524500.22NO
460.074380.1731.133.470.7268550.3821.514.591.722300.13NO
520.051610.2533.552.050.4566500.4118.242.181.365400.31NO
650.082950.2330.412.940.78611370.3112.941.981.703500.46NO
730.141990.2432.421.830.5068430.4415.045.714.473500.22NO
880.186450.1833.363.591.80842860.3922.912.101.227300.44YES

Correlation matrix of parameters from channels without impact of skiing_ Red marked statistically significant values_

VariableBed material sizeStep clast sizeHillslope gradientChannel gradientStep height avg.Step height SDStep spacing Avg.Step spacing SDNumber of stepsChannel/active zone widthValley bottom width
Bed material size
Step clast size0.678
Hillslope gradient0.7050.716
Channel gradient0.1080.0300.399
Step height avg.0.1840.0050.4060.175
Step height SD–0.037–0.1190.198–0.0530.626
Step spacing avg.–0.044–0.299–0.0120.0130.6250.280
Step spacing SD–0.179–0.282–0.340–0.0960.172–0.2120.567
Number of steps–0.2810.137–0.267–0.073–0.578–0.294–0.799–0.121
Channel/active zone width0.6110.4550.392–0.0280.079–0.0780.1810.142–0.190
Valley bottom width–0.304–0.449–0.773–0.323–0.326–0.179–0.0850.2220.165–0.169
Drainage area0.2850.4300.053–0.4890.005–0.3260.1210.4400.0510.3330.003

Correlation matrix of parameters from channels with impact of skiing_ Red marked statistically significant values_

VariableBed material sizeStep clast sizeHillslope gradientChannel gradientStep height avg.Step height SDStep spacing Avg.Step spacing SDNumber of stepsChannel/active zone widthValley bottom width
Bed material size
Step clast size0.718
Hillslope gradient0.2690.098
Channel gradient0.342–0.1530.071
Step height avg.0.0850.0490.3550.395
Step height SD0.1160.0820.2350.1880.862
Step spacing avg.0.1580.0000.616–0.292–0.081–0.105
Step spacing SD–0.178–0.2190.429–0.438–0.308–0.2660.815
Number of steps0.0270.3330.188–0.590–0.1420.1110.0580.100
Channel/active zone width–0.1840.2020.404–0.474–0.0270.077–0.0130.2470.695
Valley bottom width–0.0920.2950.331–0.4470.0560.0310.0850.1040.6320.679
Drainage area0.2240.5990.033–0.729–0.307–0.0330.0450.0560.7630.5720.510

Correlation matrix of parameters from all analysed channels_ red marked statistically significant values_

VariableBed material sizeStep clast sizeHillslope gradientChannel gradientStep height avg.Step height SDStep spacing Avg.Step spacing SDNumber of stepsChannel/active zone widthValley bottom width
Bed material size
Step clast size0.712
Hillslope gradient0.4820.390
Channel gradient0.213-0.0630.263
Step height avg.0.1470.0440.3880.253
Step height SD0.0800.0440.2200.0490.713
Step spacing avg.–0.063–0.2560.075–0.0320.3930.058
Step spacing SD–0.208–0.289–0.090–0.1920.002–0.2730.629
Number of steps–0.0760.278–0.071–0.259–0.380–0.047–0.652–0.135
Channel/active zone width0.3210.3680.383–0.1530.0710.0360.0210.0760.128
Valley bottom width–0.159–0.060–0.365–0.356–0.184–0.044–0.1430.1150.3550.091
Drainage area0.2460.5330.042–0.592–0.144–0.1310.0500.2060.3970.3740.231
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2025-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Language: English
Page range: 151 - 165
Submitted on: Jan 25, 2025
Published on: Mar 19, 2025
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2025 Dawid Piątek, Agata Gołąb, Dominika Wrońska-Wałach, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.