Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Contemporary Dynamics of Glacial Lakes: Comparison Between Selected Systems Developing in Northern, Central and Southern Regions in Spitsbergen Cover

Contemporary Dynamics of Glacial Lakes: Comparison Between Selected Systems Developing in Northern, Central and Southern Regions in Spitsbergen

By: Iwo Wieczorek  
Open Access
|Sep 2024

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Selected catchments for case studies of Svalbard glacial lakes. A – Map of Spitsbergen, B – Nepebreen and Knivseggbreen watersheds, C – Crammerbreen watershed, D – Ragnarbreen watershed, E – Gåsbreen watershed. Source: NPI Ortofoto and Basiskart. NPI, Norwegian Polar Institute.
Selected catchments for case studies of Svalbard glacial lakes. A – Map of Spitsbergen, B – Nepebreen and Knivseggbreen watersheds, C – Crammerbreen watershed, D – Ragnarbreen watershed, E – Gåsbreen watershed. Source: NPI Ortofoto and Basiskart. NPI, Norwegian Polar Institute.

Fig. 2.

Methodological process. DEM – digital elevation model; GLOF – glacial lake outburst flood.
Methodological process. DEM – digital elevation model; GLOF – glacial lake outburst flood.

Fig. 3.

Catchments of Crammerbreen, Gåsbreen, as well as Knivseggbreen and Neppebreen before GLOF and in 2023 and catchment of Ragnarbreen in 2015 and 2023. The left column shows the DEM of the catchment before GLOF, and the right column shows the current state of the catchment as seen on satellite imagery using settings that emphasise water (glacial lakes) and glaciers. DEM – digital elevation model; GLOF – glacial lake outburst flood. Source: ArcticDEM, Image © 2023 Planet Labs PBC.
Catchments of Crammerbreen, Gåsbreen, as well as Knivseggbreen and Neppebreen before GLOF and in 2023 and catchment of Ragnarbreen in 2015 and 2023. The left column shows the DEM of the catchment before GLOF, and the right column shows the current state of the catchment as seen on satellite imagery using settings that emphasise water (glacial lakes) and glaciers. DEM – digital elevation model; GLOF – glacial lake outburst flood. Source: ArcticDEM, Image © 2023 Planet Labs PBC.

Fig. 4.

Comparison of slopes (left column) and the longitudinal profiles (right column) of different glaciers and their slopes. Source: ArcticDEM. DEM, digital elevation model.
Comparison of slopes (left column) and the longitudinal profiles (right column) of different glaciers and their slopes. Source: ArcticDEM. DEM, digital elevation model.

Summary of the basic morphometric and meteorological parameters of the selected catchments_

Lake location near the glacierCatchment areaGlacier areaAnnual temperatureAnnual precipitationAltitude min-maxGlacier retreat
[km2][°C][mm][m a.s.l.][m · a−1]
Gåsbreen30.7712.59−4.0 Osuch, Wawrzyniak (2017)432.9 Błaszczyk et al. (2019)18–138818
Crammerbreen9.475.5−2.5 Repelewska-Pękalowa et al. (2013)32.4 Mędrek et al. (2014)55–82011
Knivseggbreen and Neppebreen6.302.87−6.9200–40051–7164
Ragnarbreen18.229.39>0 Rachlewicz, Styszyńska (2007)189.1 Bednorz, Jakielczyk (2014)86–9399

Comparison of glacial lake outburst flood type, area, and volume for glacial lakes in each watershed_

ClassificationUnitKnivseggbreenNepebreenCrammerbreenGoësvatnetRagnarbreen
Frontal morainedammed lakeFrontal morainedammed lakeMedial-moraine dammed lakeIce-dammed lakeFrontal morainedammed lake
Biggest recorded area (date)[m2]115,166 (2015)206,859 (2022)418,292 (2019)930,000 (1938)546,743 (2023)
Area before GLOF[m2]49,388197,264418,292370,000
Area after GLOF[m2]0145,741197,39550,000
Estimated GLOF volume[m3]666,389ND4,624,8927,391,392
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2024-0033 | Journal eISSN: 2081-6383 | Journal ISSN: 2082-2103
Language: English
Page range: 135 - 146
Submitted on: Feb 21, 2024
|
Published on: Sep 4, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2024 Iwo Wieczorek, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.