Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.

Fig. A1.

Fig. A2.

Global Moran’s I of emission levels_
| Study area | Travel scope | Moran’s I | Pseudo p-value | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tri-city | Short-distance | 0.064 | 0.001 | 1978 |
| Long-distance (all) | 0.010 | 0.039 | 1917 | |
| Long-distance (air) | 0.014 | 0.016 | 1917 | |
| Poznań | Short-distance | 0.126 | 0.001 | 1824 |
| Long-distance (all) | 0.092 | 0.001 | 1800 | |
| Long-distance (air) | 0.065 | 0.001 | 1800 |
Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) between built environment characteristics and emissions from long- and short-distance travel_
| Travel scope | Area | Distance to the closest city centre | Population density | Basic service density | Street intersection density |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-distance travel emissions | Poznań | 0.23 | -0.25 | -0.28 | -0.24 |
| Tri-city | 0.17 | -0.10 | -0.20 | -0.17 | |
| Long-distance travel emissions | Poznań | -0.10 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Tri-city | -0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
Estimation of yearly travel frequency based on survey answers_
| Answer options | Yearly trip number |
|---|---|
| Less than once a month | 10 |
| 1-3 times a month | 24 |
| 1-2 times a week | 72 |
| 3-4 times a week | 168 |
| 5 times a week or more | 240 |
Estimation of trip distance based on distance bands_
| Distance band [km] | Numeric value |
|---|---|
| 50-200 | 125 |
| 201-500 | 350 |
| 501-1000 | 750 |
| 1001-3000 | 2000 |
| >3000 | 4000 |
Emission factors for short-distance travel modes_
| Travel mode | Vehicle type | Emission coefficient | Fuel use | Fuel WTW carbon intensity | Electric energy use | Electric energy carbon intensity | Average load | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [kg CO2 · Pkm-1] | [1.·100 km-1 | Source | [kg CO2·1-1] | Source | [kWh·100 km-1] | Source | [kg CO2·kWh-1] | Source | [Pax] | Source | Assumptions | ||
| Private car | Gasoline ICEV | 0.164 | 7.16 | Survey average weight-ed by travel distance | 3.016 | (Prussi et al. 2020) | 1.64 | Survey answers | |||||
| Diesel ICEV | 0.197 | 7.08 | 3.484 | ||||||||||
| LPG ICEV | 0.116 | 7.64 | 1.876 | ||||||||||
| HEV | 0.145 | 6.65 | 3.016 | ||||||||||
| PHEV | 0.142 | 6.68 | 3.016 | 18.2 | Survey average weight-ed by travel distance | 0.792 | (KO-BiZE 2022), adjusted using Scarlat et al. (2022) method | Share of electric drive: 50% | |||||
| BEV | 0.092 | 17.3 | 0.792 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average | 0.169 | Weighted by travel distance | |||||||||||
| Tram or bus | Diesel bus | 0.081 | 42 | MPK | 3.484 | (Prussi et al. 2020) | 18 | MPK | Share of electric buses in bus perfor-mance: 8% Share of buses in transport perfor-mance: 50% | ||||
| Electric bus | 0.067 | 152 | MPK | 0.792 | MPK | ||||||||
| Tram | 0.064 | 289 | (Krych 2019) | 0.792 | 36 | (Krych 2019) | |||||||
| Weighted average | 0.072 | ||||||||||||
| Urban train | Urban train (Poznań) | 0.084 | 740 | (Jakubowski et al. 2018, 2016) | 0.792 | 70 | UTK | EN57 train Average load from KW and Polregio | |||||
| Urban train (Tri-city) | 0.039 | 740 | 0.792 | 150 | UTK | EN57 train average load in SKM and PKM | |||||||
| E-bike or e-scooter | E-bike | 0.005 | 0.6 | (Weiss et al. 2020) | 0.792 | 1 | Share of e-bikes: 50% | ||||||
| E-scooter | 0.011 | 1.4 | 0.792 | 1 | |||||||||
| Weighted average | 0.008 | ||||||||||||
Emission factors for long-distance travel modes (data of the UTK 2023 for Polregio and PKP Intercity railway carriers)_
| Travel mode | Vehicle type | Distance band(s) | CO2 emission coefficient | non-CO2 emission coefficient | Average load or utility factor | Other assumptions and sources | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [kg CO2 · Pkm-1] | [kg CO2 · vkm-1] | Source | [kg CO2eq · pkm-1] | RFI factor | [pax] | [%] | Source | ||||
| Car | All | 0.124 | 0.223 | (IEA 2023) | NA | 1.8 | NA | ||||
| Train | Average | 50-200 km | 0.068 | Own estimation based on fuel and energy consumption in commonly used trains | 73 | UTK - Polregio | 75% share in performance, EN57 | ||||
| Diesel | 0.031 | 5.859 | 25% share in performance; railcar - 65.8 l/100 km of diesel fuel | ||||||||
| Electric | 0.080 | 2.294 | Polish electricity, KOBiZE (2022) adjusted with Scarlat et al. (2022) method | ||||||||
| Electric | 201-1000 km | 0.053 | 11.084 | 209 | UTK - PKP Intercity | ||||||
| Electric | >1001 km | 0.022 | 4.676 | European electric-ity (Scarlat et al., 2022) | |||||||
| Ferry | 50-200 km | 0.415 | (Czepkiewicz et al. 2018c) | ||||||||
| >200 km | 0.238 | ||||||||||
| Bus | 50-1000 km | 0.073 | (Mantzos et al. 2018) | ||||||||
| >1001 km | 0.067 | (Doll et al. 2020) | |||||||||
| Plane | 50-200 km | 0.699 | Own estima-tions based on Knorr and Huttermann (2016) | 0.000 | 1.0 | 71 | Fuel use per seat-km from Knorr and Huttermann (2016) Kerosene WTW emissions from Jing et al. (2022) | ||||
| 201-500 km | 0.348 | 0.000 | 1.0 | 71 | |||||||
| 501-1000 km | 0.209 | 0.119 | 1.6 | 75 | |||||||
| 1001-3000 km | 0.151 | 0.143 | 2.0 | 75 | |||||||
| >3000 km | 0.133 | 0.213 | 2.8 | 80 | |||||||