Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.

Formulas to calculate the landscape disturbance_
| Index | Equation | Assessment Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Landscape disturbance (Xie et al. 2013; X. Zhang et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2020) | Si = aCi + bNi + cDi a + b + c = 1 a = 0,5; b = 0,3; c = 0,2 | landscape class or sub-class |
| Landscape fragmentation (X. Zhang et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2020) | landscape class or sub-class | |
| Landscape isolation, segmentation, or splitting (Xie et al. 2013; X. Zhang et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2020) | landscape class or sub-class | |
| Landscape dominance (Jin et al. 2019) | landscape class or sub-class |
Landscape ecological risk index calculation_
| Index | Equation | Assessment Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Ecological risk | grid (if one grid contains > 1 classes or sub-classes, their indices are summed, adjusting the area proportion) | |
| Landscape loss degree | Ri = Fi × Si | landscape class or sub-class |
Calculation of global and local spatial autocorrelation_
| Global spatial autocorrelation | Local spatial autocorrelation | |
|---|---|---|
Global spatial autocorrelation of landscape ecological risk (LER) in the Parangtritis coastal dune_
| Scenario | Moran’s I | Zscore |
|---|---|---|
| Sub-class 2011 | 0.4112 | 18.0872 |
| Sub-class 2020 | 0.6342 | 27.0196 |
| Class 2011 | 0.5775 | 24.6668 |
| Class 2020 | 0.6177 | 26.3570 |
Landscape fragility index (Fi) of various landscape classes based on their genesis (natural processes or human interventions)_
| Landscape class | Natural | Agrogenic | Tree agrogenic | Industrogenic | Info-telecommunication | Tourismsports | Traffic | Urbanogenic | Water management |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | 1.000 | 0.686 | 0.145 | 0.472 | 0.068 | 0.319 | 0.098 | 0.048 | 0.215 |