References
- Aiello V., Reverberi P.M., Brasili C., 2019. European identity and citizens’ support for the EU: Testing the utilitarian approach. Regional Science Policy and Practice 11(4): 673–693. DOI 10.1111/rsp3.12242.
- Aykac B., Metin H., 2012. The future of public organizations. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 62: 468–472. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.077.
- Babbie E., 2004. Badania społeczne w praktyce (Social research in practice). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw.
- Bachtler J., Mendez C., Oraže H., 2014. From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies 22(4): 735–757. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.772744.
- Bachtrögler J., Fratesi U., Perucca G., 2020. The influence of the local context on the implementation and impact of EU Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies 54(1): 21–34. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2018.1551615.
- Bartniczak B., 2010. Zagraniczna pomoc ekologiczna jako przykład międzynarodowej współpracy w dziedzinie ochrony środowiska (Foreign ecological aid as an example of international co-operation in the field of environmental protection). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. Ekonomia 7(132): 11–20.
- Becker P., 2019. The reform of European Cohesion Policy or how to couple the streams successfully. Journal of European Integration 41(2): 147–168. DOI 10.1080/07036337.2018.1553964.
- Boin A., Christensen T., 2008. The development of public institutions: Reconsidering the role of leadership. Administration and Society 40(3): 271–297. DOI 10.1177/0095399707313700.
- Boyne G.A., Meier J.M., O’Toole L. Jr., Walker R.M., 2005. Where next? Research directions on performance in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 633–639. DOI 10.1093/jopart/mui037.
- Capello R., Perucca G., 2018. Understanding citizen perception of European Union Cohesion Policy: The role of the local context. Regional Studies 52(11): 1451–1463. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2017.1397273.
- Casson M.C., Giusta M.D., Kambhampati U.S., 2010. Formal and informal institutions and development. World Development 38(2): 137–141. DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.008.
- Chaumba J., 2013. The use and value of mixed methods research in social work. Advances in Social Work 14(2): 307–333.
- Churski P., 2008. Czynniki rozwoju regionalnego i polityka regionalna w Polsce w okresie integracji z Unią Europejską (Factors of regional development and regional policy in Poland in the period of integration with the European Union). Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań.
- Churski P., Perdał R., 2016. Where do Cohesion Policy funds flow and do they have any impact? The Polish lesson. Barometr Regionalny 14(3): 7–24.
- Cichocki P., 2011. Polish attitudes towards the European Union. Przegląd Zachodni 3: 265–277.
- Conyers D., 1983. Decentralization: The latest fashion in development administration? Public Administration and Development 3(2): 97–109. DOI 10.1002/pad.4230030202.
- Crescenzi R., Giua M., 2020. One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states. Regional Studies 54(1): 10–20. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1665174.
- Czyż T., 2016. Metoda wskaźnikowa w geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej (The concept of indicator in socio-economic geography). Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 34: 9–19.
- Dąbrowski M., Spaans M., Fernandez-Maldonado A.M., Rocco R., 2021. Cohesion Policy and the citizens’ perceptions of the EU: The role of communication and implementation. European Planning Studies 29(5): 827–843. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2020.1805413.
- Faludi A., Peyrony J., 2011. Cohesion policy contributing to territorial cohesion – Future scenarios. European Journal of Spatial Development 9(2): 2–21. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.5139322.
- Farole T., Rodríguez-Pose A., Storper M., 2011. Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies 49(5): 1089–1111. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x.
- Fiedor B., 2015. Instytucje formalne i nieformalne w kształtowaniu trwałego rozwoju (Formal and informal institutions in shaping sustainable development). Studia i Prace WNEiZ US (Studies and research of the Faculty of Economics and Management of the University of Szczecin) 40(2): 83–107.
- Fratesi U., Wishlade F.G., 2017. The impact of European Cohesion Policy in different contexts. Regional Studies 51(6): 817–821. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673.
- Gruszewska E., 2017. Instytucje formalne i nieformalne. Skutki antynomii (Formal and informal institutions. Results of antinomy). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 493: 36–50. DOI 10.15611/pn.2017.493.03.
- Hawrysz L., Foltys J., 2016. Environmental aspects of social responsibility of public sector organizations. Sustainability 8(1): 19. DOI 10.3390/su8010019.
- Herodowicz T., 2016. Interwencja środowiskowa polityki spójności w Polsce – merytoryczne ukierunkowanie i regionalne zróżnicowanie (Environmental intervention of cohesion policy in Poland – the substantive orientation and regional diversity). Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 33: 95–116.
- Herodowicz T., 2020. Znaczenie polityki regionalnej Unii Europejskiej w kształtowaniu środowiskowego wymiaru rozwoju zrównoważonego w Polsce (The importance of the European Union regional policy in shaping the environmental dimension of sustainable development in Poland). Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.
- Hooghe L., 1996. Introduction: Reconciling EU-wide policy and national diversity. In: Hooghe L. (ed.), Cohesion policy and European integration: Building multi-level governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1–24.
- Hooghe L., Marks G., 2001. Multi-level governance and European integration. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
- Iacovino N.M., Barsanti S., Cinquini L., 2017. Public organizations between old public administration, new public management and public governance: The case of the Tuscany Region. Public Organization Review 17: 61–82. DOI 10.1007/s11115-015-0327-x.
- Komornicki T., Szejgiec-Kolenda B., Degórska B., Goch K., Śleszyński P., Bednarek-Szczepańska M., Siłka P., 2018. Spatial planning determinants of cohesion policy implementation in Polish regions. EUROPA XXI 35: 69–97. DOI 10.7163/Eu21.2018.35.5.
- Maciejewska-Mieszkowska K., 2017. Stosunek Polaków do Unii Europejskiej a ich udział w wyborach do parlamentu europejskiego (The attitude of Poles towards the European Union and their participation in the elections to the European Parliament). Studia Wyborcze 24: 7–18. DOI 10.26485/SW/2017/24/1.
- Medeiros E., 2014. Assessing territorial impacts of the EU Cohesion Policy: The Portuguese case. European Planning Studies 22(9): 1960–1988. DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.813910.
- Medeiros E., 2017. European Union Cohesion Policy and Spain: A territorial impact assessment. Regional Studies 51(8): 1259–1269. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2016.1187719.
- Niczyporuk J., 2009. Sfera publiczna (Public sphere). In: Blicharz J., Boć J. (eds), Prawna działalność instytucji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego (Legal activities of civil society institutions). Kolonia Ltd., Wrocław: 119–124.
- North D.C., 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Quality of Government Institute, 2010. Measuring the quality of government and subnational variation. Report for the European Commission Directorate-General Regional Policy Directorate Policy Development. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Online: https://nicholascharron.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/final-report-parts-1-3.pdf (accessed 2 November 2022).
- Rodríguez-Pose A., 2013. Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies 47(7): 1034–1047. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2012.748978.
- Rodríguez-Pose A., Garcilazo E., 2015. Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies 49(8): 1274–1290. DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933.
- Romanelli M., 2017. Rethinking public organizations as knowledge-oriented and technology-driven organizations. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy 5(4): 559–576. DOI 10.25019/MDKE/5.4.06.
- Shorten A., Smith J., 2017. Mixed methods research: Expanding the evidence base. Evidence-Based Nursing 20: 74–75. DOI 10.1136/eb-2017-102699.
- Stachowiak K., Stryjakiewicz T., 2008. Institutional approach in economic geography and its relevance to regional studies. Quaestiones Geographicae 27B(1): 7–2.
- Surubaru N.C., 2017. Administrative and political embeddedness: How to improve the institutional environments dealing with the management and implementation of EU Structural and Investment Funds? The experience of new member states. In: Bachtler J., Berkowitz P., Hardy S., Muravska T. (eds), EU Cohesion Policy Reassessing performance and direction. Routledge, London and New York: 171–185.
- Syssoeva N.M., 2010. Institutional problems of regional development in Russia. Quaestiones Geographicae 29(2): 19–25. DOI 10.2478/v10117-010-0011-8.
- Wæraas A., Byrkjeflot H., 2012. Public sector organizations and reputation management: Five problems. International Public Management Journal 15(2): 186–206. DOI 10.1080/10967494.2012.702590.
- Wytrążek W., 2011. Podstawowe pojęcia teorii organizacji i zarządzania w instytucjach publicznych (The main terms of organisation and management in public institutions). In: Kawalec P., Wodzisz R., Lipski P. (eds), Podstawy naukoznawstwa, t. 2 (Fundamentals of science, vol. 2). Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin: 315–337.