Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Services of General Interest in the Promotion of Spatial Justice Cover

The Role of Services of General Interest in the Promotion of Spatial Justice

By: Gergely Tagai  
Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Andreotti, A., Mingione, E. & E. Polizzi 2012 ‘Local welfare systems: A challenge for social cohesion’, Urban Studies 49(9): 1925–1940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012444884
  2. Bădiță, C. & E. Vincze 2019: The Pata Cluj project. Residential desegregation of the landfill area of Cluj-Napoca, Romania, RELOCAL Case Study, No. 25/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
  3. Barca, F. 2009 An agenda for reformed cohesion policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, Brussels: European Commission.
  4. Bell, D. & S. Davoudi 2016 ‘Understanding justice and fairness in and of the city’ in S. Davoudi & D. Bell [eds] Justice and Fairness in the City, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447318385.001.0001
  5. Breuer, I. A. & A. Milbert 2015 ‘Services of general interest indicators: methodological aspects and findings’, Europa XXI 23: 29–46. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2013.23.2
  6. Calleja, A. 2015 Unleashing Social Justice through EU Public Procurement, Abingdon: Routledge.
  7. Connelly, S. & K. Bradley 2004 ‘Spatial justice, European spatial policy and the case of polycentric development’, Paper for the ECPR Workshop on ‘European Spatial Politics or Spatial Policy for Europe?’, Uppsala: Sweden 13–18.4.2004. [online]. [cit. 17.09.2019]. Available at: https://ecpr.eu/filestore/paperproposal/acf96714-7941-4f8c-a6a4-4680370473d3.pdf
  8. Czirfusz, M. 2021 ‘The concept of solidarity in cohesion policies of the European Union and Hungary’, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 5: 919–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420971636
  9. Czyżewski, B. & J. Polcyn 2016 ‘Education quality and its drivers in rural areas of Poland’, Eastern European Countryside 22: 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1515/eec-2016-0010
  10. Dmochowska-Dudek, K., Napierała, T., Tobiasz-Lis, P. & M. Wójcik 2019 The participatory budget for Lodz, Poland, RELOCAL Case Study, No. 21/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
  11. EAPN Services Group 2007 Services of general interest: glossary and terms explained, Brussels: EAPN.
  12. European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) 2007 ‘Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Communication from the Commission implementing the Community Lisbon programme: Social services of general interest in the European Union’, (COM(2006) 177 final), Official Journal of the European Union, 2007/C 161/22: C 161/80–C 161/88.
  13. Esping-Andersen, G. 1989 ‘The three political economies of the welfare state’, Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 26(1): 10–36.
  14. ESPON 2011 EDORA – European development opportunities in rural areas, Final Report, ESPON Applied Research 2013/1/2, Luxembourg: ESPON.
  15. ESPON 2013a SeGI – Indicators and perspectives for services of general interest in territorial cohesion and development, Final Report, ESPON Applied Research 2013/1/16, Luxembourg: ESPON.
  16. ESPON 2013b Services of general interest, ESPON Evidence Brief, No 4, Luxembourg: ESPON.
  17. ESPON 2017 PROFECY – Processes, features and cycles of inner peripheries in Europe, Final Report, ESPON Applied Research, Luxembourg: ESPON.
  18. European Commission (EC) 1993 Green Paper – European social policy – Options for the Union, COM(93) 551 final, Brussels: European Commission.
  19. European Commission (EC) 1994 European social policy – A way forward for the Union. A White Paper, Part A. COM(94) 333 final, Brussels: European Commission.
  20. European Commission (EC) 1996 ‘Services of general interest in Europe’, Official Journal of the European Communities 96 /C 281/03: 3–12.
  21. European Commission (EC) 2003 Green Paper on services of general interest, COM(2003) 270 final, Brussels: European Commission.
  22. European Commission (EC) 2004 ‘A new partnership for cohesion: convergence – competitiveness – cooperation’, Third report on economic and social cohesion, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  23. European Commission (EC) 2006 Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: Social services of general interest in the European Union, COM(2006) 177 final, Brussels: European Commission.
  24. Faludi, A. 2007 ’Territorial cohesion policy and the European Model of Society’, European Planning Studies, 15(4): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701232079
  25. Gruber, E. & D. Rauhut 2016 ‘Spatial justice and the welfare state: SGI provision in peripheral Austria and Sweden’, A paper prepared for the Regional Studies Association’s European Conference, Graz, Austria, 3–6.4.2016. [online]. [cit. 17.09.2019]. Available at: < https://www.regionalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Spatial_Justice_and_the_Welfare_State_FINAL.pdf>
  26. Harvey, D. 1996 Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference, Oxford: Blackwell.
  27. Harvey, D. 2009 Social Justice and the City: Revised Edition, Athens: University of Georgia Press.
  28. Hossu, I. E. & E. Vincze 2019 Mălin-Codlea. Legalization of an informal settlement in Brașov county, Romania, RELOCAL Case Study, No. 27/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
  29. Humer, A. 2014 ‘Researching social services of general interest: an analytical framework derived from underlying policy systems’, European Spatial Research and Policy 21(1): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/esrp-2014-0006
  30. Humer, A. & P. Palma 2013 ‘The provision of services of general interest in Europe: regional indices and types explained by socio-economic and territorial conditions’, Europa XXI 23: 85–104. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2013.23.5
  31. Humer, A., Rauhut, D. & N. Marques Da Costa 2013 ‘European types of political and territorial organisation of social services of general interest’, Romanian Journal of Regional Science (7)Special Issue: 142–164.
  32. Jelinek, Cs. & T. Virág 2019 György-telep. Ten years of urban regeneration in a poor neighbourhood, Hungary, RELOCAL Case Study, no. 14/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
  33. Jeziorska-Biel, P., Janiszewska, A., Wójcik, M., Dmochowska-Dudek, K., Tobiasz-Lis, P. & T. Napierała 2019 Communal service. A social cooperative as part of a local revitalisation program in Brzeziny, Poland, RELOCAL Case Study, no. 22/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
  34. Keller, J. & T. Virág 2019a Give Kids a Chance: spatial injustice of child welfare at the peripheries. The case of Encs, Hungary, RELOCAL Case Study, no. 13/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
  35. Keller, J. & T. Virág 2019b ‘Possibilities and constraints of place-based development projects to temper hierarchical dependencies in a deprived neighbourhood’, Justice spatiale / Spatial justice 10: 1–22.
  36. Keller, J. & T. Virág 2021: ‘Drop in the sea or catalyst for change: diverse effects of the place-based approach in Europe’, European Planning Studies https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1928047
  37. Kovács, K. 2010 ‘Social and administrative crises interlocking: the misery of rural peripheries in Hungary’, Eastern European Countryside 16: 89–113. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10130-010-0005-5
  38. Lefebvre, H. 1991 The Production of Space, Oxford: Blackwell.
  39. Littke, H. & D. Rauhut 2015 ‘Minimum levels of services of general interest – What fundamental rights do individuals and enterprises have?’ Europa XXI 23: 47–68. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2013.23.3
  40. Madanipour, A., Shucksmith, M., Talbot, H. & J. Crawford 2017 Conceptual framework for the project, RELOCAL – Resituating the local in cohesion and territorial development, Deliverable 1.1. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
  41. Milbert, A., Breuer, I. M., Rosik, P., Stępniak, M. & X. Velasco 2013 ‘Accessibility of services of general interest in Europe’ Romanian Journal of Regional Science 7(Special Issue, Summer): 37–65.
  42. Muscar Bensayag, E. F. 2007 ‘Las necesidades básicas insatisfechas (NBI) y su relación con los equipamientos salud y educación [Unsatisfied basic needs (UBN) and its relationship with health and education facilities]’ in R. del Caz Enjuto and M. Rodríguez [eds] El Derecho a los Equipamientos, a los Edificios Públicos. Informe de Valladolid 2006, Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, pp. 81–88.
  43. Nadin, V. & D. Stead 2008 ’European spatial planning systems, social models and learning’, disP The Planning Review 172(1): 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
  44. Neergard, U., Szyszczak, E., Van De Gronden, J. W. & M. Krajewski 2013 ‘Introduction’ in U. Neergard, E. Szyszczak, J. W. van de Gronden & M. Krajewski [eds] Social Services of General Interest in the EU, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 3–24.
  45. Noguera, J. & M. Ferrandis 2014 ‘Accessibility and provision of services of general interest in rural areas of the European Union’, Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 64: 489–493.
  46. Noguera-Tur, J., Del Mar García-García, M., Veloso-Pérez, E. & J. Lückenkötter 2009 ‘Review of current situation and trends: access to services of general interest’, EDORA – European development opportunities in rural areas, Final Report, ESPON Applied Research 2013/1/2. Annex 1 (Version 2) Part 6, EDORA Working Paper No. 6, Luxembourg: ESPON, pp. 298–347.
  47. Opp, S. 2017 ‘The forgotten pillar: a definition for the measurement of social sustainability in American cities’, Local Environment 22(3): 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2016.1195800
  48. Rawls, J. 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  49. Sen, A. 1999 Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  50. Sen, A. 2009 The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books.
  51. Soja, E. W. 2009 ‘The city and spatial justice (La ville et la justice spatiale)’, justice spatiale / spatial justice n° 01, septembre/september 2009.
  52. Soja, E. W. 2010 Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  53. Świątek, D., Komornicki, T. & P. Siłka 2013 ‘Services of general interest: empirical evidence from case studies of the SEGI project’, Europa XXI 23: 105–130. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2013.23.6
  54. Tésits, R., Alpek, L. & G. Hoványi 2019 ‘Some experience of the complex, national human resource development programmes in the Hungarian rural regions’, Eastern European Countryside 25: 95–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EEC.2019.004
  55. Vaughan-Whitehead, D. 2015 ‘The European Social Model in times of crisis: An overview’ in D. Vaughan-Whitehead [ed] The European Social Model in Crisis: Is Europe Losing its Soul?, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar pp. 1–66.
  56. Vincze, E., Bădiță, C. & I. E. Hossu (2019): ‘Incomplete housing justice in Romania under neoliberal rule’ Justice spatiale / Spatial justice 10: 1–32.
  57. Virág, T. & Cs. Jelinek 2019 ‘Development brokers and place-based projects in deprived urban neighbourhoods: the case of Pécs, Hungary’, Justice spatiale/Spatial justice 10: 1–22.
  58. Weck, S. & V. Kamuf 2020 ‘Comparative case study research in RELOCAL: An overview on the methodology’, Part of RELOCAL Deliverable 6.4. Dortmund: ILS – Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development/Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
  59. Weck, S., Kamuf, V. & F. Matzke 2020 ‘Situating the RELOCAL cases’, Deliverable 6.4 cross-comparative analysis of country perspectives on spatial justice, Dortmund: ILS – Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development/Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
  60. Young, I. 1990 Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/eec.2023.004 | Journal eISSN: 2300-8717 | Journal ISSN: 1232-8855
Language: English
Page range: 83 - 114
Published on: Jun 26, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Gergely Tagai, published by Nicolaus Copernicus University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.