Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Can bottom-up ocean CO2 fluxes be reconciled with atmospheric 13C observations? Cover

Can bottom-up ocean CO2 fluxes be reconciled with atmospheric 13C observations?

Open Access
|Jan 2010

Abstract

The rare stable carbon isotope, 13C, has been used previously to partition CO2 fluxes into land and ocean components. Net ocean and land fluxes impose distinctive and predictable fractionation patterns upon the stable isotope ratio, making it an excellent tool for distinguishing between them. Historically, isotope constrained inverse methods for calculating CO2 surface fluxes—the ‘double deconvolution’—have disagreed with bottom-up ocean flux estimates. In this study, we use the double deconvolution framework, but add, as a constraint, independent estimates of time histories of ocean fluxes to the atmospheric observations of CO2 and 13CO2. We calculate timeseries of net land flux, total disequilibrium flux and terrestrial disequilibrium flux from 1991 to 2008 that are consistent with bottom-up net ocean fluxes.We investigate possible drivers of interannual variability in terrestrial disequilibrium flux, including terrestrial discrimination, and test the sensitivity of our results to those mechanisms. We find that C3 plant discrimination and shifts in the global composition of C3 and C4 vegetation are likely drivers of interannual variability in terrestrial disequilibrium flux, while contributions from heterotrophic respiration and disturbance anomalies are also possible.

Language: English
Page range: 369 - 388
Submitted on: Jan 1, 2010
Accepted on: Jun 8, 2010
Published on: Jan 1, 2010
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2010 Caroline B. Alden, John B. Miller, James W.C. White, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.