Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Transport and chemistry of isoprene and its oxidation products in deep convective clouds Cover

Transport and chemistry of isoprene and its oxidation products in deep convective clouds

Open Access
|Jan 2021

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

SkewT-logP and wind diagrams for the atmospheric soundings retrieved in Manaus, Brazil on April 8 (a), 2020, April 23, 2020 (b) and April 27, 2020 (c).

Table 1.

Molecular properties for the system compounds used in the simulations.

IDCompoundΔH,kJmolPeffθ, PaMg , gmol0O3 (ozone)23.20.5×109481NO (nitric oxide)13.20.2×1010302NO2 (nitrogen dioxide)19.90.5×109463NO3 (nitrate)15.81.4×108624OH (hydroxyl radical)35.60.1×106175HO2 (hydroperoxy radical)48.90.8×104336H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide)48.50.6×102347CO (carbon monoxide)10.70.5×1010288CH4 (methane)15.70.4×1010169RO2 (organic peroxy radicals)30.70.3×1064710ROOH (organic hydroperoxide)43.10.2×1054811CH3OOH (methyl hydroperoxide)43.10.2×1054812HCHO (formaldehyde)56.40.1×1043013HNO3 (nitric acid)72.20.6×1026314HO2NO2 (pernitric acid)69.81.4×1057915C5H8 (isoprene)36.50.4×1096816ISOP1O2 (isoprene peroxy radical)52.16.1×10411717ISOPOOH (first-generation isoprene hydroxy hydroperoxide)84.50.5×10011818ISOP1Nit (isoprene hydroxy nitrate)79.81.0×10314719C4CBYL (methyl vinyl ketone (MVK) or methacrolein (MACR) and related analogues)35.63.9×1057020ISOP1OH (isoprene diol)61.85.5×10210221IEPOX (isoprene epoxy diol)89.20.7×10011822ISOP2O2 (second-generation isoprene peroxy radical)110.51.5×10313523DHHPEPOX (isoprene di-hydroxy hydroperoxy epoxide)118.62.4×10413524ISOPDHDHP (di-hydroxy di-hydroperoxides)142.91.5×10713525ISOPDHHPNit (di-hydroxy hydroperoxy nitrates)138.12.0×10519726ISOPTHHP (isoprene tri-hydroxy hydroperoxide)131.31.6×10613527ISOP1NitO2 (isoprene nitrate peroxy radical)105.70.2×10019628ISOPDiNit (isoprene di-nitrates)133.34.7×10322629C4CBYLNit (nitrates of MVK, MACR and related analogues)82.61.2×10214930ISOPTHNit (isoprene tri-hydroxy nitrate)126.51.9×10418131C4CBYLO2 (peroxy radicals from MVK, MACR, and related analogues)29.01.2×10610132PAN (peroxyacetic nitric anhydride)39.43.4×105121
Table 2.

Different settings for the simulations.

Simulation ID[Isoprene], ppbAimREF (0)3Base simulation to investigate the system evolution for different parcels and clouds.NULL_CHEM (7)3To quantify the impact of neglecting all the chemical interactions on the system.NULL_ISOP (8)0To understand how OH evolves in the absence of isoprene.LIGHTNING (12)3To investigate how adding NO source of 0.0016 ppb s–1 from lightning (at 8-12 km) influences the system evolution.LIGHTNING + NULL_COND_ICE (14)3To investigate how adding NO source of 0.0016 ppb s–1 from lightning (at 8-12 km) along with shutting off the condensation on ice influences the system evolution.
Fig. 2.

Volatility diagram for the compounds in the modelled system.

Fig. 3.

Trajectories of the 400 simulated deep convective cloud air parcels for the April 23, 2020 case (grey), parcels averaged by height bins (black), parcel A used for further analysis (red) (a), distribution of parcels according to their final altitude (b), the altitude of parcel A (red line) and the corresponding water vapour concentration (green line) (c), the total water mass of the different types of hydrometeors (d), and the reversed timescale of mixing (e).

Fig. 4.

Evolution of gas phase concentrations of the 21 selected compounds (see Table 1) along the trajectory A (see Fig. 3) for the REF and NULL_CHEM simulations given in Table 2. The concentrations in ppb are normalised to the corresponding initial values also in ppb. The compound notations are followed by the corresponding volatility acronym in parentheses. Corresponding figures for all the 33 modelled species are provided in SI.

Fig. 5.

Evolution of OH along the trajectory A (see 3) for the REF (blue solid line), LIGHTNING (black dashed line), LIGHTNING + NULL_COND_ICE (black dotted line), NULL_ISOP (red dotted line) simulations as well as concentration of water vapour (or H2O, green solid line) as a function of time. Grey shaded area shows lightning period.

Fig. 6.

Evolution of gas phase concentrations of the 21 studied compounds (see Table 1) along the trajectory A (see Fig. 3) for the simulations REF (blue line), LIGHTNING (dashed black line) and LIGHTNING + NULL_COND_ICE (dotted black line), see Table 2. The grey shaded area denotes period of simulated lightning. The concentrations in ppb are normalised to the corresponding initial values also in ppb. The compound notations are followed by the corresponding volatility acronym in parentheses. Figures for all the 33 modelled species as well as a figure which compares the REF and LIGHTNING cases are provided in SI.

Fig. 7.

Trajectories from three different simulated deep convective cloud events (a, b and c). All parcels were divided into bins as a function of their arrival altitude and their properties were thereafter averaged (filled circles in a, b and c). Histogram of the final altitudes of the parcels (d) and chemical concentrations (e) in the out-of-cloud background (dashed line) and in the binned parcels after 2 h of simulation for three deep convective cloud cases (colored lines). Simulation settings are according to REF (see Table 2).

Table A1. Coefficients aij used for meteorological interactions.

CoefficientExpressiona11(a1(ev)a1(rem)+a1(frz))a12a2(mlt)a13(a3(aut)+a3(acc))a140a15a1(cs)a21a1(frz)a22(a2(ev)a2(rem)+a2(mlt))a230a24(a4(aut)+a4(acc))a25a2(cs)a310a320a33(a3(ev)+a3(aut)+a3(acc)+a3(frz))a34a3(mlt)a35a3(cs)a410a420a43a3(frz)a44(a4(ev)+a4(aut)+a4(acc)+a4(frz))a45a4(cs)a51a1(ev)a52a2(ev)a53a3(ev)a54a4(ev)a55(i=15ai(cs)+a(ex)+a(mix))ba(mix)C(BG)

[i] See Bardakov et al. (2020) for more details about the coefficients.

Table B1. Photolysis reactions.

Photolysis reactionRate, s–1SourceO3 + hν → 2OH6.52e-5 k′ [H2O]/(k″[M])TUV model (a,b)H2O2 + hν → 2OH1.18e-6TUV modelCH3OOH + hν → OH9.9e-6TUV modelHCHO + hν → 2HO2 + CO9.8e-5TUV modelNO2 + hν → NO + O31.2e-2TUV modelNO3 + hν → NO22.8e-4TUV modelISOPOOH + hν → 2OH + HCHO9.9e-6TUV model

[i] a) [M] = 7.243×1016P(Pa)T(K), where P is the air pressure.

[ii] b) k and k are the rates for reactions O(1D)+H2O2OH and O(1D)+N2O(3P)+M* with assumed values of 2.1×1010 and 3.3×1011 respectively (Tan et al., 2019).

[iii] c) all constants in front of the rates are defined for standard TUV calculator simulations.

Table B2. Chemical reactions for the system components and their rates. Part 1.

ReactionRate, cm3molec sSourceNO + O3 → NO22.07e-12EXP(-1400/T)IUPACOH + O3 → HO21.7e-12EXP(-940/T)MCMHO2 + O3 → OH2.03e-16(T/300.)4.57 EXP(-693/T)MCMHO2 + NO → OH + NO23.45e-12EXP(270/T)IUPACOH + NO2 → HNO3K1 a IUPACOH + HNO3 → NO3KMT11MCMNO + NO3 → 2NO21.8e-11EXP(110/T)MCMHO2 + NO2 → HO2NO2KMT09MCMOH + HO2NO2 → NO23.2e-13*EXP(690/TEMP)MCMOH + HO2 → -4.8e-11*EXP(250/TEMP)MCMOH + HCHO → HO2 + CO4.8e-11*EXP(250/TEMP)MCMHO2 + HO2 → H2O2K2 b IUPACOH + CO → HO2KMT05MCMOH + CH4 → RO21.85e-12EXP(-1690/T)IUPAC c HO2 + RO2 → ROOHKRO2HO2MCMRO2 + NO → HCHO + NO2KRO2NOMCMIsoprene + OH → ISOP1O22.10e-11 EXP(465/T)IUPACISOP1O2 + HO2 → ISOPOOHKRO2HO2MCMISOP1O2 + NO → 0.104 ISOP1Nit + 0.896 (C4CBYL + NO2 + HCHO + HO2)KRO2NOMCMISOP1O2 + RO2 → 0.3 ISOP1OH + 0.7 C4CBYL + 0.4 HO21e-12assumedISOP1O2 + ISOP1O2 → 2 (C4CBYL + CO + HO2)1e-12assumedISOPOOH + OH → 0.7 IEPOX + 0.7 OH + 0.3 ISOP2O21.54e-10MCMISOP2O2 → DHHPEPOX + OH3.3e12EXP(-8660/T)assumedISOP2O2 + HO2 → ISOPDHDHPKRO2HO2MCMISOP2O2 + NO → 0.13 ISOPDHHPNit + 0.87 (C4CBYL + NO2 + HCHO)KRO2NOMCMISOP2O2 + RO2 → 0.3 ISOPTHHP + 0.7 (C4CBYL + HCHO)e-12assumedISOP1Nit + OH → ISOP1NitO22.17e-11assumedISOP1NitO2 + HO2 → ISOP1NitHPKRO2HO2MCMISOP1NitO2 + NO → 0.16 ISOPDiNit + 0.84 (C4CBYLNit + NO2 + HCHO)KRO2NOMCMISOP1NitO2 + RO2 → 0.3 ISOPTHNit + 0.7 (C4CBYLNit + HCHO)1e-12assumedIEPOX + OH → C4CBYL + HCHO8.4e-12MCMDHHPEPOX + OH → C4CBYL + HCHO + OH8.4e-12MCMC4CBYL + OH → C4CBYLO28.0e-12EXP(380/T)MCMC4CBYLO2 + NO2 → PANKFPANMCMPAN → RO2 + NO2KBPANMCMC4CBYLO2 + NO → 0.07C4CBYLNit + 0.93(2 HCHO + 2 CO + NO2 + HO2)KRO2NOMCMISOPDiNit + OH → C4CBYLNit + HCHO + NO2 + HO21.63e-12assumedISOPDHDHP + OH → C4CBYL + HCHO1.05e-11 EXP(465/T)assumedC4CBYLNit + OH → 2 HCHO + 2 CO + NO2 + HO22.6e-12 EXP(610/T)assumedISOPDHHPNit + OH → C4CBYLNit + HCHO1.05e-11 EXP(465/T)assumedISOPTHHP + OH → C4CBYL + HCHO1.05e-11 EXP(465/T)assumed

[i] a) K1=3.2×1030(T/300)4.5[M]×3.0×1011F3.2×1030(T/300)4.5[M]+3.0×1011.

[ii] b) K2=2.2×1013e600/Tf0+1.9×1033e980/T[M]f0.

[iii] [M]=7.243×1016P(Pa)T(K), where P is the air pressure.

[iv] F is the broadening factor defined from: log10Flog10Fc1+[log10(k0/k)/(0.751.25log10Fc)], with Fc=0.41.

[v] f0=1+1.4×1021[H2O]e2200/T.

[vi] c) OH+CH4H2O+CH3 reaction rate used. IUPAC data is available at https://iupac-aeris.ipsl.fr/

Language: English
Page range: 1979856 - 1979856
Published on: Jan 1, 2021
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Roman Bardakov, Joel A. Thornton, Ilona Riipinen, Radovan Krejci, Annica M. L. Ekman, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.