Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Dynamics of an idealized fluid model for investigating convective-scale data assimilation Cover

Dynamics of an idealized fluid model for investigating convective-scale data assimilation

Open Access
|Jan 2017

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Schematic of the pressure term P(hb) in (3): the modified pressure p(Hc-b)=12g(Hc-b)2 above the threshold Hc is lower than the standard pressure p(h)=12gh2, thus forcing the fluid to rise where h+b>Hc.

Figure 2.

Time evolution of the height profile for the standard shallow water case I (left), case II with convection and no rain with Hr (middle) and case III with convection and rain for finite Hc,Hr (right). Non-dimensional simulation details: Ro=0.1,Fr=1,N=250;(Hc,Hr)=(1.01,1.05);(α,β,c02)=(10,0.1,0.81).

Figure 3.

Hovmöller plots for the Rossby adjustment process with initial transverse jet: case I (left), II (middle) and III (right). From top to bottom: h(xt), u(xt), v(xt) and r(xt). Non-dimensional simulation details: same as Fig. 2.

Figure 4.

Evolution of h and r for the Rossby adjustment process with initial transverse jet: case I (left), II (middle) and III (right). Top row: Hovmöller plots for h. Subsequent rows: profiles of h (black line; left axis) and r (blue line; right axis) at different times denoted by the dashed lines in the top row. Non-dimensional simulation details: same as Fig. 2.

Figure 5.

Hovmöller plots for the Rossby adjustment process with initial transverse jet, highlighting the conditions for the production of rain: case III. From left to right: h>Hr, -xu>0, and r(xt). Non-dimensional simulation details: same as Fig. 2.

Figure 6.

Top row: Hovmöller diagram plotting the evolution of the departure from geostrophic balance gxh-fv: light (deep) shading denotes regions close to (far from) geostrophic balance. Subsequent rows: profiles of fv (red) and gxh (black) at different times denoted by the dashed lines in the top figure. For case I (left), II (middle), and III (right). Non-dimensional simulation details: same as Fig. 2.

Figure 7.

Flow over topography (bc=0.5, a=0.05 and xp=0.1): profiles of h+b, b (black; left y-axis), exact steady-state solution for the SWEs (red dashed; as derived in Appendix 4) and rain r (blue; right y-axis) at different times: case I (left), II (middle) and III (right). The dotted lines denote the threshold heights Hc<Hr. Non-dimensional simulation details: Fr=2;Ro=;Nel=1000;(Hc,Hr)=(1.2,1.25);(α,β,c02)=(10,0.1,0.081).

Figure 8.

Hovmöller plots for flow over topography (Fr=2), highlighting the conditions for the production and subsequent evolution of rain: case III. From left to right: h+b, -xu and r. Non-dimensional simulation details: same as Fig. 7.

Figure 9.

Same as Fig. 7 but with two orographic ridges: bc=0.4, a=0.05, and (xp1,xp2)=(0.0875,0.2625). Non-dimensional simulation details: same as Fig. 7.

Figure 10.

Same as Fig. 8 but with two orographic ridges. Non-dimensional simulation details: same as Fig. 7.

Language: English
Page range: 1369332 - 1369332
Submitted on: Feb 22, 2017
Accepted on: Jul 29, 2017
Published on: Jan 1, 2017
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2017 Thomas Kent, Onno Bokhove, Steven Tobias, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.