Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Rehabilitation technology and the reproduction of bodily normality: a critical analysis of robotic gait training in Turkey Cover

Rehabilitation technology and the reproduction of bodily normality: a critical analysis of robotic gait training in Turkey

Open Access
|Nov 2016

References

  1. Bell, D. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.
  2. Bezmez, D. 2013. “Urban Citizenship, the Right to the City and Politics of Disability in Istanbul.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (1): 93114. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01190.x
  3. Bezmez, D., and S. Yardımcı. 2010. “In Search of Disability Right: Citizenship and Turkish Disability Organizations.” Disability & Society 25 (5): 603615. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2010.489312
  4. Bezmez, D., and S. Yardımcı. 2015. “Social Experiences of Physical Rehabilitation: The Role of the Family.” In Disability Research Today: International Perspectives, edited by T. Shakespeare, 926. Oxon: Taylor & Francis.
  5. Dole, C. 2004. “In the Shadows of Medicine and Modernity: Medical Integration and Secular Histories of Religious Healing in Turkey.” Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 28: 255280. doi: 10.1023/B:MEDI.0000046423.59991.de
  6. Erol, M. 2008. “Rites of the Second Spring: Situational Analysis of Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy in Turkey.” PhD diss., Science and Technology Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York.
  7. Fasoli, S. E., B. Ladenheim, J. Mast, and H. I. Krebs. 2012. “New Horizons for Robot-assisted Therapy in Pediatrics.” American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 91: S280S289. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31826bcff4
  8. Gleeson, B. 1998. “A Place on Earth: Technology, Space, and Disability.” The Journal of Urban Technology 5 (1): 87109. doi: 10.1080/10630739884001
  9. Harris, J. 2010. “The Use, Role and Application of Advanced Technology in the Lives of Disabled People in the UK.” Disability & Society 25 (4): 427439. doi: 10.1080/09687591003755815
  10. Hidler, J., L. F. Hamm, A. Lichy, and S. L. Groah. 2008. “Automating Activity-based Interventions: The Role of Robotics.” Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 45 (2): 337344. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2007.01.0020
  11. Hidler, J., and P. S. Lum. 2011. “The Road ahead for Rehabilitation Robotics.” Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 48 (4): viix. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2011.02.0014
  12. Hilman, M. 2003. “Rehabilitation Robotics from Past to Present – A Historical Perspective.” The Eighth International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, April 23–25.
  13. Krebs, H. I., L. Dipietro, S. Levy-Tzedek, S. E. Fasoli, A. Rykman-Berland, J. Zipse, J. A. Fawcett, et al. 2008. “A Paradigm Shift for Rehabilitation Robotics.” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 27 (4): 6170. doi: 10.1109/MEMB.2008.919498
  14. Lewis, G. N., and J. A. Rosie. 2012. “‘Virtual Reality Games for Movement Rehabilitation in Neurological Conditions: How Do We Meet the Needs and Expectations of the Users?Disability & Rehabilitation 34 (22): 18801886. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.670036
  15. Moser, I. 2006. “Disability and the Promises of Technology: Technology, Subjectivity and Embodiment within an Order of the Normal.” Information, Communication & Society 9 (3): 373395. doi: 10.1080/13691180600751348
  16. Moser, I., and J. Law. 2003. “‘Making Voices’ New Media Technologies, Disabilities, and Articulation.” In Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains, edited by G. Liestol and T. Rasmussen, 491520. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  17. Oliver, M. [1996] 2009. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
  18. Özbay, C., A. Terzioğlu, and Y. Yasin, eds. 2011. Neoliberalizm ve Mahremiyet: Türkiye'de Beden, Sağlık ve Cinsellik [Neoliberalism and Intimacy: Body, Health and Sexuality in Turkey]. Istanbul: Metis.
  19. Phelan, S. K., V. Wright, and B. E. Gibson. 2014. “Representations of Disability and Normality in Rehabilitation Technology Promotional Materials.” Disability and Rehabilitation 36 (24): 20722079. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.891055
  20. Roulstone, A. [1998] 2005. “Researching a Disabling Society: The Case of Employment and New Technology.” In The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives, edited by T. Shakespeare, 110128. London: Continuum.
  21. Seymour, W. 2005. “ICTs and Disability: Exploring the Human Dimensions of Technological Engagement.” Technology and Disability 17: 195204.
  22. Seymour, W., and D. Lupton. 2004. “Holding the Line Online: Exploring Wired Relationships for People with Disabilities.” Disability & Society 19 (4): 291305. doi: 10.1080/09687590410001689421
  23. Sheldon, A. 2004. “Changing Technology.” In Disabling Barriers-Enabling Environments, edited by J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes, and C. Thomas, 155160. London: Sage.
  24. Söderström, S., and B. Ytterhus. 2010. “The Use and Non-use of Assistive Technologies from the World of Information and Communication Technology by Visually Impaired Young People: A Walk on the Tightrope of Peer Inclusion.” Disability & Society 25 (3): 303315. doi: 10.1080/09687591003701215
  25. Terzioğlu, A. 2008. “Experiencing and Explaining Cancer: A Critical Study of Turkish Modernity through the Cancer Patients’ Illness Narratives.” PhD diss., Department of Anthropology, The City University of New York.
Language: English
Page range: 343 - 353
Submitted on: Apr 17, 2015
Accepted on: Oct 27, 2015
Published on: Nov 4, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Dikmen Bezmez, Sibel Yardımcı, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.