Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Risky business? Organizing sexual facilitation in Swedish personal assistance services Cover

Risky business? Organizing sexual facilitation in Swedish personal assistance services

By:   
Open Access
|Jul 2016

References

  1. Andersen, Jan, Agneta Hugemark, and Bjarne Richter Bjelke. 2014. “The Market of Personal Assistance in Scandinavia: Hybridization and Provider Efforts to Achieve Legitimacy and Customers.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 16 (sup1): 3447. doi:10.1080/15017419.2014.880368.
  2. Askheim, Ole Petter. 2005. “Personal Assistance – Direct Payments or Alternative Public Service. Does it Matter for the Promotion of User Control?Disability & Society 20 (3): 247260. doi:10.1080/09687590500060562.
  3. Bahner, Julia. 2012. “Legal Rights or Simply Wishes? The Struggle for Sexual Recognition of People with Physical Disabilities Using Personal Assistance in Sweden.” Sexuality and Disability 30 (3): 337356. doi:10.1007/s11195-012-9268-2.
  4. Bahner, Julia. 2013. “The Power of Discretion and the Discretion of Power: Personal Assistants and Sexual Facilitation in Disability Services.” Vulnerable Groups & Inclusion 4. doi:10.3402/vgi.v4i0.20673.
  5. Bahner, Julia. 2015. “Sexual Professionalism: For whom? The Case of Sexual Facilitation in Swedish Personal Assistance Services.” Disability & Society 30 (5): 788801. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1021761.
  6. Barbour, Rosaline. 2007. Doing Focus Groups. London: Sage.
  7. Bloor, Michael, Jane Frankland, Michelle Thomas, and Kate Robson. 2001. Focus Groups in Social Research. London: Sage.
  8. Boyle, Pamela S. 1993. “Training in Sexuality and Disability: Preparing Social Workers to Provide Services to Individuals with Disabilities.” In Sexuality and Disabilities: A Guide for Human Service Practitioners, edited by Romel W. Mackelprang and Valentine Deborah, 4562. Binghampton: Haworth Press.
  9. Browne, Jan, and Sarah Russell. 2005. “My Home, Your Workplace: People with Physical Disability Negotiate their Sexual Health without Crossing Professional Boundaries.” Disability & Society 20 (4): 375388. doi:10.1080/09687590500086468.
  10. Couldrick, Lorna, and Alex Cowan. 2013. “Enabling Disabled People to Have and Enjoy the Kind of Sexuality They Want.” In Women, Sexuality and the Political Power of Pleasure, edited by Susie Jolly, Andrea Cornwall, and Kate Hawkins, 111141. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Duggleby, Wendy. 2005. “What about Focus Groups Interaction Data?Qualitative Health Research 15 (6): 832840. doi:10.1177/1049732304273916.
  12. Earle, Sarah. 2001. “Disability, Facilitated Sex and the Role of the Nurse.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 36 (3): 433440. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01991.x
  13. Egard, Hanna. 2010. “Personlig Assistans i Praktiken. Beredskap, Initiativ och Vänskaplighet. [Personal Assistance in Practice. Preparedness, Initiative and Friendliness].” School of Social Work, University of Lund.
  14. Giertz, Lottie. 2012. “Erkännande, Makt och Möten. En Studie av Inflytande och Självbestämmande med LSS [Recognition, Relations and Power. A Study of Influence and Self-Determination in LSS].” PhD, Department of Social Work, Linnaeus University.
  15. Guldvik, Ingrid, Karen Christensen, and Monica Larsson. 2014. “Towards Solidarity: Working Relations in Personal Assistance.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 16 (sup1): 4861. doi:10.1080/15017419.2014.897644.
  16. Halkier, Bente. 2010. “Focus Groups as Social Enactments: Integrating Interaction and Content in the Analysis of Focus Group Data.” Qualitative Research 10 (1): 7189. doi:10.1177/1468794109348683.
  17. Hamilton, Carol Anne. 2009. “‘Now I'd Like to Sleep with Rachael’ – Researching Sexuality Support in a Service Agency Group Home.” Disability & Society 24 (3): 303315. doi:10.1080/09687590902789461.
  18. Hugemark, Agneta. 1998. “Motstridiga Tendenser i Handikappomsorgen – Professionalism versus Personlig Assistans [Ambiguous Tendencies in Disability Care – Professionalism versus Personal Assistance].” In Organisation och Välfärdsstat [Organisation and Welfare State], edited by Rafael Lindqvist, 157–179. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  19. Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  20. Kemshall, Hazel. 2002. Risk, Social Policy and Welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  21. Kitzinger, Jenny, and Rosaline Barbour. 1999. “Introduction: The Challenge and Promise of Focus Groups.” In Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice, edited by Jenny Kitzinger and Rosaline Barbour, 120. London: Sage.
  22. Kulick, Don, and Jens Rydström. 2015. Loneliness and its Opposite: Sex, Disability and the Ethics of Engagement. Durham: Duke University Press.
  23. Lewin, Barbro, Lina Westin, and Leif Lewin. 2008. “Needs and Ambitions in Swedish Disability Care.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 10 (4): 237257. doi:10.1080/15017410802410068.
  24. Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
  25. Manthorpe, Jill, Mike Walsh, Andy Alaszewski, and Larry Harrison. 1997. “Issues of Risk Practice and Welfare in Learning Disability Services.” Disability & Society 12 (1): 6982. doi:10.1080/09687599727470.
  26. Molander, Anders, and Harald Grimen. 2010. “Understanding Professional Discretion.” In Sociology of Professions. Continental and Anglo-Saxon Traditions, edited by Lennart G. Svensson and Julia Evetts, 167187. Borås: Diadalos.
  27. Mollow, Anna, and Robert McRuer. 2012. “Introduction.” In Sex and Disability, edited by Robert McRuer and Anna Mollow, 136. Durham: Duke University Press.
  28. Mona, Linda R. 2003. “Sexual Options for People with Disabilities.” Women & Therapy 26 (3–4): 211221. doi:10.1300/J015v26n03_03.
  29. Morgan, David. 1997. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
  30. Myers, Greg, and Phil Macnaghten. 1999. “Can Focus Groups Be analyzed as Talk?” In Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice, edited by Jenny Kitzinger and Rosaline Barbour, 173186. London: Sage.
  31. Patton, Michael Quinn. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. London: Sage.
  32. Power, Michael. 2007. Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Rubin, Gayle. 1984. “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality.” In Culture, Society and Sexuality: A Reader, edited by R. Parker and P. Aggleton, 150187. London: Routledge.
  34. Scott, W. R. 2008. “Lords of the Dance: Professionals as Institutional Agents.” Organization Studies 29 (2): 219238. doi:10.1177/0170840607088151.
  35. SFS. 1993:387. Lag om Stöd och Service till Vissa Funktionshindrade [Act Concerning Support and Service for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments].
  36. Shakespeare, Tom, Kath Gillespie-Sells, and Dominic Davies. 1996. Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires. London: Casell.
  37. Shildrick, Margrit. 2007. “Contested Pleasures: The Sociopolitical Economy of Disability and Sexuality.” Journal of NSRC 4 (1): 5366.
  38. Shuttleworth, Russell. 2010. “Towards an Inclusive Sexuality and Disability Research Agenda.” In Sex and Disability. Politics, Identity and Access, edited by Russel Shuttleworth and Teela Sanders, 120. Leeds: The Disability Press.
  39. Shuttleworth, Russel. 2012. “Bridging Theory and Experience. A Critical-interpretive Ethnography of Sexuality and Disability.” In Sex and Disability, edited by Robert McRuer and Anna Mollow, 5468. Durham: Duke University Press.
  40. Shuttleworth, Russell, Cherry Russell, Patricia Weerakoon, and Tinashe Dune. 2010. “Sexuality in Residential Aged Care: A Survey of Perceptions and Policies in Australian Nursing Homes.” Sexuality and Disability 28 (3): 187194. doi:10.1007/s11195-010-9164-6.
  41. Siebers, Tobin. 2012. “A Sexual Culture for Disabled People.” In Sex and Disability, edited by Robert McRuer and Anna Mollow, 3753. Durham: Duke University Press.
  42. Smithson, Janet. 2000. “Using and Analysing Focus Groups: Limitations and Possibilities.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3 (2): 103119. doi: 10.1080/136455700405172
  43. Socialstyrelsen. 2011. “Är det Normalt och Tillåtet för Hemtjänsten att Sexuellt Tillfredsställa en Vårdtagare? [Is it Normal and Allowed for the Elder-Care Assistant to Sexually Satisfy a Care Taker?].” Accessed January 11, 2013. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/etikisocialtjansten/ardetnormaltochtillatetforhemt.
  44. Socialstyrelsen. 2012a. “Kan Personlig Assistent Hjälpa Person med Funktionsnedsättning att Onanera?” Accessed January 11, 2013. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/etikisocialtjansten/skapersonligassistenthjalpaper.
  45. Socialstyrelsen. 2012b. Seksualitet på Dagsordenen: En håNdbog om Professionel støtte til voksne med Funktionsnedsættelse [Sexuality on the Agenda: A Handbook for Professional Support to Adults with Disabilities]. Denmark: Socialstyrelsen.
  46. Svensk, Veronica. 2011. Hemligheter Kända av Många – En Metod och Handbok för dig som har Personlig Assistans [Secrets Known by Many – A Method- and Handbook for You who have Personal Assistance]. Stockholm: Förbundet Unga Rörelsehindrade.
  47. Weeks, Jeffrey. 2010. Sexuality. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
  48. WHO. 2006. Defining Sexual Health: Report of a Technical Consultation on Sexual Health. Geneva: WHO Press.
  49. Wilkerson, Abby. 2011. “Disability, Sex Radicalism and Political Agency.” In Feminist Disability Studies, edited by Kim Q. Hall, 193217. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Language: English
Page range: 164 - 175
Submitted on: May 2, 2014
Accepted on: Mar 12, 2015
Published on: Jul 2, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Julia Bahner, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.