Countering disablism: an alternative universal income support system based on egalitarianism

Jennifer M. Mays

doi:10.1080/15017419.2014.995218

Countering disablism: an alternative universal income support system based on egalitarianism

Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

Volume 18 (2016): Issue 2

By: Jennifer M. Mays

Open Access

|Jan 2016

Abstract

The long-term vision of economic security and social participation for people with a disability held by disability activists and policy-makers has not been realized on a global scale. This is despite the implementation of various poverty alleviation initiatives by international and national governments. Indeed within advanced Western liberal democracies, the inequalities and poverty gaps have widened rather than closed. This article is based on findings from a historical-comparative policy and discourse analysis of disability income support system in Australia and the Basic Income model. The findings suggest that a model such as Basic Income, grounded in principles of social citizenship, goes some way to maintaining an adequate level of subsistence for people with a disability. This article concludes by presenting some challenges and a commitment to transforming income support policy.

References

Cantillon, B., and W. Van Lancker. 2013. “Three Shortcomings of the Social Investment Perspective.” Social Policy and Society 12 (4): 553–564. doi:10.1017/S1474746413000080.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chouirnard, V., and V. A. Crooks. 2005. “‘Because They Have All the Power and I Have None’: State Restructuring of Income and Employment Supports and Disabled Women's Lives in Ontario, Canada.” Disability and Society 20 (1): 19–32. doi:10.1080/0968759042000283610.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collard, S. 2013. “Workplace Pension Reform: Lessons from Pension Reform in Australia and New Zealand.” Social Policy and Society 12 (1): 123–134. doi:10.1017/S1474746412000474.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Commonwealth of Australia. 1975. Australian Government’s Commission of Inquiry into Poverty: Poverty in Australia Vol. 1. Henderson Poverty Report. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printer. http://www.biga.qut.edu.au.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cunliffe, J., and G. Erreygers. 2005. The Origins of Universal Grants: An Anthology of Historical Writings on Basic Capital and Basic Income. Houndsmills, BA: Palgrave Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drakeford, M., and K. Davidson. 2013. “Going from Bad to Worse? Social Policy and the Demise of the Social Fund.” Critical Social Policy 33 (3): 365–383. doi:10.1177/0261018312471164.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Esping-Andersen, G. 2000. “Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.” In The Welfare State: A Reader, edited by C. Pierson and F. G. Castles, 154–169. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fairclough, N. 2009. “A Dialectical-relational Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis in Social Research.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 162–186, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gibilisco, P. 2003. “A Just Society Inclusive of ‘People with Disabilities’.” Journal of Australian Political Economy 52: 128–142.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grover, C., and L. Piggott. 2013. “Disability and Social (In)Security: Emotions, Contradictions of ‘Inclusion’ and Employment and Support Allowance.” Social Policy and Society 12 (3): 369–380. doi:10.1017/S1474746412000619.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Howe, B. 2004. “Empowering the Disabled.” Paper presented at the Australian College of Educators National Conference, September 2004. http://www.novaemployment.com.au.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Humpage, L. 2007. “Models of Disability, Work and Welfare in Australia.” Social Policy and Administration 41 (3): 215–231. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00549.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Humpage, L. 2008. “Radical Change or More of the Same? Public Attitudes towards Social Citizenship in New Zealand since Neoliberal Reform.” Australian Journal of Social Issues 43 (2): 215–230.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lo Vuolo, R., and D. Raventós. 2009. Basic Income in Times of Grave Economic Crisis. http://www.redrentabasica.org.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Malacrida, C. 2010. “Income Support Policy in Canada and the UK: Different, but Much the Same.” Disability and Society 25 (6): 673–686. doi:10.1080/09687599.2010.505739.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McDonald, A. 1995. Universal Income Support: A Discussion Paper. Urangan: McDonald. http://www.biga.qut.edu.au.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McDonald, A. 2000. Universal Income Support: Benefits of Universal Income Support Free of Means Test. OASIS-Australia. http://www.biga.qut.edu.au.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mendelson, M., K. Battle, S. Torjman, and E. Lightman. 2010. A Basic Income Plan for Canadians with Severe Disabilities. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Milner, D. 1920. Higher Production by a Bonus on National Output: A Proposal for a Minimum Income for all Varying with National Productivity. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oliver, M. 2009. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. 2nd ed. Houndsmills: Macmillan Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Palmer, M. 2011. “Disability and Poverty: A Conceptual Review.” Journal of Disability Policy Studies 21 (4): 210–218. doi:10.1177/1044207310389333.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Parker Harris, S., R. Owen, and R. Gould. 2012. “Parity of Participation in Liberal Welfare States: Human Rights, Neoliberalism, Disability and Employment.” Disability and Society 27 (6): 823–836. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.679022.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pérez, J. L. R. 2005. “The Right to Work Reassessed: How We Can Understand and Make Effective the Right to Work.” Rutgers Journal of Law and Urban Policy 2 (1): 217–237.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prideaux, S., A. Roulstone, J. Harris, and C. Barnes. 2009. “Disabled People and Self Directed Support Schemes: Re-conceptualising Work and Welfare in the 21st Century.” Disability and Society 24 (5): 557–569. doi:10.1080/09687590903010909.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Raventós, D. 2007. Basic Income: The Material Conditions of Freedom. Translated and edited by J. Wark. London: Pluto Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Richardson, S. O. 2013. “Entitlement Reform: From Tangled Web to Safety Net.” Basic Income Studies 8 (1): 105–137. doi:10.1515/bis-2013-0001.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Russell, M. 2001. “Disablement, Oppression, and the Political Economy.” Journal of Disability Policy Studies 12 (2): 87–95. doi:10.1177/104420730101200205.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saunders, P., and M. Wong. 2013. “Examining Australian Attitudes to Inequality and Redistribution.” Journal of Australian Political Economy 71: 51–75.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seipel, M. M. 2013. “Social Security: Strengthen Not Dismantle.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare XL (3): 69–84.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soldatic, K., and B. Pini. 2012. “Continuity or Change? Disability Policy and the Rudd Government.” Social Policy and Society 11 (2): 183–196. doi:10.1017/S1474746411000510.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sommerfield, D., and M. Reisch. 2003. “Unintended Consequences: The Impact of Welfare Reform in the United States on NGOs.” Voluntas 14 (3): 299–320. doi:10.1023/A:1025666603812.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Standing, G. 2002. Beyond the New Paternalism: Basic Security as Equality. London: Verso.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Standing, G. 2005. “Why Basic Income is Needed for a Right to Work.” Rutgers Journal of Law and Urban Policy 2 (1): 91–102.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Standing, G. 2009. Work after Globalization: Building Occupational Citizenship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tomlinson, J. 2000. Income Insecurity: The Basic Income Alternative. http://www.nla.gov.au/nla.arc-42199.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tomlinson, J. 2007. “Australia: Basic Income and Decency.” New Community Quarterly 5 (1): 33–41.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tulloch, P. 1979. Poor Policies: Australian Income Security 1972–1977. London: Croom Helm.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Parijs, P. 1992. “Introduction: Competing Justifications of Basic Income.” In Arguing for Basic Income, edited by P. Van Parijs, 3–43. London: Verso.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Parijs, P. 2007. “International Distributive Justice.” In The Blackwell’s Companion to Political Philosophy Vol. II, edited by R. E. Goodin, P. Pettit, and T. Pogge, 638–652. Oxford: Blackwell.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Trier, W. 1995. Every One a King: An Investigation into the Meaning and Significance of the Debate on Basic Incomes with Special Reference to Three Episodes from the British Inter-War Experience. Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Verhoeven, I., and E. Tonkens. 2013. “Talking Active Citizenship: Framing Welfare State Reform in England and the Netherlands.” Social Policy and Society 12 (3): 415–426. doi:10.1017/S1474746413000158.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wiggan, J. 2012. “Telling Stories of 21st Century Welfare: The UK Coalition Government and the Neo-liberal Discourse of Worklessness and Dependency.” Critical Social Policy 32 (3): 383–405. doi:10.1177/0261018312444413.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilkinson, R., and K. Pickett. 2009. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Allen Lane.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article