Table 1.
An illustration of how the directed content analysis was performed.
Initial key concepts (IPS principles)Operationalization of key conceptsThemesThe consumer's preference is the guiding light
Job coaches use open Socratic questions
Study visits are arranged in a large numbers of workplaces
Trustful relationships are established between coaches and clients
The IPS coach as a cicerone Time for reflected experiencesConstruction and reconstruction of one's occupational identityIndividualized ongoing support without
time limitJob coaches and clients evaluate every work placement together – taking care of ‘failures’
Exposure of a variety of environments – no standardized solutions
Absence of time limits in the IPS provided leads to feelings of security among clients
A coach who does not visit the client′s workplace faces difficulties in individualizing the support
Integration of IPS and mental health services
Weak matching between ongoing psychiatric treatment and job coaching
Bad treatment from mental health staff when meeting client and coach at the clinic
Regulations of employment office hamper the rehabilitation process
A civil servant at the social insurance office works closely with both the IPS team and psychiatric services to solve concerns about the client's financial situation
The importance of coordinated collaboration
Table 2.
The occupational movements of the cases included in the study.
Time from baseline to 24 monthsOccupation024681012141618202224EmploymentEEC,ECC,EC,EC,EC,EC,EC,EB,CB,CB,CEducationDDB,DB,DB,DBBB,DB,DB,DWork practiceB,C,D,EEA,EA,EAA,DA,DA,DA,DESheltered workBEEEENo occupationA,C,DA,BA,B,DBBAAA,E
Table 3.
Individual outcome from questionnaires: Anne.
BaselineMedian value24 monthsMedian valueBPRS (psychiatric symptoms)35303128GAF (global psychosocial functioning)54556565Rosenberg (self-esteem)2.302.402.702.70MANSA (quality of life)4.004.505.204.58OSA (occupational competence)0.570.841.840.92OSA (occupational value)1.701.552.011.84IPS provided in hours/year106 (0–12 m)6365 (13–24 m)37
Table 4.
Individual outcome from questionnaires: Benny.
BaselineMedian value24 monthsMedian valueBPRS (psychiatric symptoms)30302628GAF (global psychosocial functioning)65558065Rosenberg (self-esteem)2.602.403.602.70MANSA (quality of life)5.254.505.334.58OSA (occupational competence)1.700.842.410.92OSA (occupational value)3.151.551.401.84IPS provided in hours/year91 (0–12 m)6317 (13–24 m)37
Table 5.
Individual outcome from questionnaires: Cecilia.
BaselineMedian value24 monthsMedian valueBPRS (psychiatric symptoms)27303028GAF (global psychosocial functioning)68555465Rosenberg (self-esteem)2.602.401.802.70MANSA (quality of life)5.584.504.504.58OSA (occupational competence)2.870.840.840.92OSA (occupational value)0.841.551.551.84IPS provided in hours/year31 (0–12 m)6334 (13–24 m)37
Table 6.
Individual outcome from questionnaires: David.
BaselineMedian value24 monthsMedian valueBPRS (psychiatric symptoms)30302728GAF (global psychosocial functioning)55556865Rosenberg (self-esteem)1.802.401.602.70MANSA (quality of life)3.914.504.084.58OSA (occupational competence)−0.120.84−0.230.92OSA (occupational value)0.151.550.171.84IPS provided in hours/year76 (0–12 m)6337 (13–24 m)37
Table 7.
Individual outcome from questionnaires: Ellie.
BaselineMedian value24 monthsMedian valueBPRS (psychiatric symptoms)34303228GAF (global psychosocial functioning)55555565Rosenberg (self-esteem)2.702.402.202.70MANSA (quality of life)4.504.503.174.58OSA (occupational competence)−0.500.840.040.92OSA (occupational value)0.841.551.701.84IPS provided in hours/year97 (0–12 m)6370 (13–24 m)37