Table 1.
Social care institutions for feeble-minded children in Russia in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century.
‘Brotherhood of the Queen of Heaven’: E.Gracheva's shelter
- in St. Petersburg
- in the province of Kursk
- in Moscow
- in VyatkaCharity, medical treatment, teaching, training of children in literacy and productive labour, schooling for religious rites1894
1902
1905
1907The Evangelical Refuge of Saint Emanuel for children with epilepsy and/or feeble-minded established in St. PetersburgEveryday childcare, schooling for religious rites in the chapel. Only for Lutheran children1881Philanthropic research institutionsPsycho neurological Institute founded by M.Bechterev:Epileptic clinic;Institute of morally defective children;Special Institute of child development studyComplex study of child’ early stages development, early upbringing, training of teachers;a clinical observation, a medical treatment, a labour therapy, training of child psychiatricians1907–1917
1912–1917Public pedagogical societies:The Society of education and upbringing of abnormal children, chaired by professor L.Blaumenau, S-Petersburg;The Society of experimental pedagogy, founded by A.Nechaev, S-Petersburg;The Moscow Teacher's house, MoscowScientific discussions of educational and upbringing methods for abnormal children; practical education and upbringing children1909–1910
1909–1917
1911–1917
[i] In the first general population census of 1897, the total number of citizens in the Russian Empire (excluding Finland) was 129.1 million with the total number of children from new-borns up to age 19 about 61 million. Medical statistics show that there were about 200,000 children with severe disabilities from birth and with acquired psychosis (Zamsky 1980, 254). Despite scientific discussion and investigation of the clinical differences between mental retardation and acquired psychosis (Troshin 1915), the official statistical data offer no clarity. On the eve of the October Revolution, there were in all the institutions no more than 1000 children recorded as mentally retarded, which most likely was only a very small fraction of those in this group of children in need of social care. After the revolution, these institutions were nationalized and partially reorganized, and some were closed. Sources: Mikhailenko, Shamrej, and Ilinsky (2012), Troshin (1915), Kashchenko and Krukov (1913 [2005]), Vedomstvo uchrezhdenii imperatritsi Marii: Kratkii istoricheskii ocherk (1912), Petrogradskii evangelicheskii prijut vo imya Svyatogo Emmanuila dliya slaboumnih i epileptikov (2011–2012), Pedogogicheskaya entsiklopediya (1964), Kabanov, Shereshevskii, and Zhuravel (1977), Kadnevskii (2005), Zamsky (1980).
Table 2.
Main tendencies of the development of institutional practice for children with mental retardation during the period of 1917–1936.
A medical-pedagogical consultation unit is attached to the ‘Childcare Department’ with its main function to give methodological support to educational institutions through specified literature, instructions, curricula, etc.1919 – The Council of Child Protection is established with the function of providing children with food, clothes and accommodation1920 – Establishment of baby homes1920 – Adults and children with learning disabilities (the feeble-minded, idiots) as well as the blind and the deaf are transferred to the jurisdiction of the People's Commissariat of Social Welfare1921 – Department of Social and Legal Protection of Minors established1921 – The Commission to Combat Hunger starts relocating children from territories suffering starvation to other territoriesSome reform examples 1920 – 1931:
1920 – By the Decree ‘On coordination of functions between the People's Commissariats of Education and of Health’: Those ‘incapable of learning’ – whether adult or children – are together with the deaf and the blind placed under the jurisdiction of the People's Commissariat of Social Affairs. Any treatment and teaching in these cases becomes secondary to the task of custody.1926 – The first Acts passed on types of special institutions: children's homes for preschool children; schools with and without boarding facilities for school-age children; schools with professional-technical orientation for teens, with and without boarding; schools with and without boarding for children of different ages; special groups (vspomogatelnii gruppi) for children and teens at ordinary schools.1926 – ‘On the selection of children for placement in special institutions’ (vspomogatelnii uchrezhdenia)1928 – Establishment of a five-year school for the mentally retarded (vspomogatelnaia shkola).1931 – General compulsory education for defective children; a special school for the mentally retarded (vspomogatelnaya shkola) becomes a seven-year factory school.
[i] Source: Compiled from Dobrova (1970); Hronologicheskoe sobranie zakonov, ukazov prezidiuma verhovnogo soveta i postanovlenii praviteljstva RSFSR (1917–1928), (1929–1939); Spravochnik po vspomogatelnoi shkolei po shkolam fizicheski deferctivnih detei (1929) [Guide for a special school and schools for physically handicapped children].
Table 3.
Summary of findings.
October revolutionWorld War I ends. Civil war. Stalin's terrorThe Stalinist system consolidated.
The Constitution of Victorious SocialismType of state leadershipTsarist monarchyDifferent political voices, more and more eradicated by the BolsheviksCommunist Party hegemony (Constitution ‘Rukovodjashee jadro’ [leading core])IdeologyIdealist position heritage of powers (social position given by divine rights)Experimental, dream of homo sovieticusDogmatic materialist (Marxism-leninism) The collective is important. Enforcement of a work ethicChildren and disabilityChildren with disabilities mostly kept at home but growing ideas of different upbringing and education from philanthropistsThousands of homeless children. Socialist humanism, collective upbringing, extensive use of institutional care and/or camps/coloniesAmong disabled children, educable children go to boarding schools, non-educable children to other institutionsScience related to disabilityPluralistic: psychology, pedology, defectology
Strong behaviouristic tradition from PavlovStrong pedagogic influence; VygotskyScience subordinated to politics; psychology more behaviouristic, pedology expelled, defectology increasingly importantActors in disability careMostly philanthropicPhilanthropic and StateState control, basically through People's CommissariatsInternational contacts/influences within disability careScientific exchanges with for example other European countries, such as Germany and FranceDeclining number of international scientific contactsMore isolated, less foreign influence
