References
- Akrich
, M.. “ The Description of Technical Objects .” In, edited by Wiebe E.and John, 205– 224. Baskerville: MIT press. - Bury
, M.. “ On Chronic Illness and Disability .” In. 5th ed., edited by C. E., P., and A. M., 173– 183. New Jersey, PA: Prentice Hall. - Finkelstein
, V.. A Personal Journey into Disability Politics. Leeds: The Disability Studies Archive UK, Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds. - Finkelstein
, V.. The Social Model Repossessed. Leeds: The Disability Studies Archive UK, Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds. - hmi
. 2011. http://www.hmi.dk+hmi-basen.dk/en/about.asp - Latour
, B.. Pandora's Hope. Essay on the Reality of Science Studies. London: Harvard University Press. - Lie
, M., and K., eds. . Making Technology Our Own? Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press. - Lindegaard
, H., and S.. 2010. “ Homespace or Workspace? The Use of Multiple Assistive Technologies in Private Dwellings .” In, edited by M.and M., 95– 105. Farnham: Ashgate. - Mol
, A., and Law, J. 2004. “ Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies. The Example of Hypoglycaemia.” The Body and Society( 2,3): 43– 62. doi: 10.1177/1357034X04042932. - Moser
, I.. “ A Body that Matters? The Role of Embodiment in the Recomposition of Life after a Road Traffic Accident.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research( 2): 83– 99. doi: 10.1080/15017410902830520. - Oliver
, M.. “ If I Had a Hammer: The Social Model in Action .” In, edited by C., 18– 31. Leeds: The Disability Press. - Oliver
, M., and F.. 1987. “ Disability and Self-Help: A Case Study of the Spinal Injuries Association.” Disability, Handicap & Society( 2): 113– 125. doi: 10.1080/02674648766780131. - Progressive Mobility, and Medical Assistance
. 2011. http://www.progressivemobility.com/resource/products/productlist.asp?Cat=57. - Oudshoorn
, N., M., and E.. 2005. “ Diversity and Distributed Agency in the Design and Use of Medical Video-Communication Technologies .” In, edited by Hans, 85– 107, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. - Shove
, E., M., M., and J.. 2007. The Design of Everyday Life. Oxford & New York: designresearchnetwork.com - Silverstone
, R., D., A., and S. M.. 1989. Families, Technologies, and Consumption: The Household and Information and Communication Technologies. CRICT discussions paper. Brunel University. - Thomas
, C.. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press. - Thomas
, C.. “How is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches.” Disability & Society( 6): 569– 583. doi: 10.1080/0968759042000252506. - United Nations
. 2006. Standard Rules on the Equalizations of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities. www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/dissre03.htm. - Williams
, S. J.. “ Is Anybody there? Critical Tealism, Chronic Illness and the Disability Debate.” Sociology of Health and Illness( 6): 797– 819. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00184. - Zola
, I.. “ Bringing Our Bodies and Ourselves Back In: Reflections on a Past, Present, and Future ‘Medical Sociology’.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior( 1): 1– 16. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2136796?origin=JSTOR-pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2013.803499 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 267 - 279
Submitted on: Jan 25, 2013
Accepted on: Apr 24, 2013
Published on: Jul 3, 2014
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2014 Søsser Brodersen, Hanne Lindegaard, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.