Psycho-emotional disablism: a differentiated process

Impairment status×feeling lonely cross tabulationPercentage of within impairment statusFeeling lonelyI feel lonely: Never (%)I feel lonely: Seldom (%)I feel lonely: Sometimes (%)I feel lonely: Often (%)Total (%)Impairment status Non-impaired46.233.716.04.1100.0 Impaired35.132.021.911.0100.0Total45.633.616.44.4100.0

Table 2.

Cross tabulation, impairment and psycho-emotional well-being, and impairment and psycho-emotional well-being, respectively (n=9199).

Impairment statusNon-impaired (%)Impaired (%)Psycho-emotional well-being Very high well-being25.618.6 High well-being22.716.6 Low well-being29.326.9 Very Low well-being22.437.9Total100100Psycho-emotional well-being (average reply) Very high well-being25.618.5 High well-being48.941.5 Low well-being25.438.9 Very low well-being0.21Total100100

Table 3.

Regression coefficients. Dependent: psycho-emotional well-being (n=9105).

Model summaryChange statisticsModelRR²Adjusted R²Standard error of the estimateR² changeF changedf1df2Significance of F change10.102^{^a}0.0100.0101.065830.01042.031140150.00020.184^{^b}0.0340.0331.053320.02396.922140140.00030.185^{^c}0.0340.0331.053220.0001.747140130.18640.201^{^d}0.0400.0391.049900.00626.435140120.00050.201^{^e}0.0400.0391.050020.0000.104140110.747

a Predictors: (constant), impairment status.

b Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender.

c Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender, immigrant background.

d Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender, immigrant background, social class.

e Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender, immigrant background, social class, sexual orientation.

Table 4.

Cross tabulation, psycho-emotional well-being and gender/impairment (n=9112).

Gender/impairment status×psycho-emotional well-being cross tabulationPercentage within gender/impairment statusPsycho-emotional well-beingVery low psycho-emotional well-being (%)Low psycho-emotional well-being (%)High psycho-emotional well-being (%)Very high psycho-emotional well-being (%)Total (%)Gender/impairment status Non-impaired boys17.628.823.330.3100.0 Impaired boys32.629.414.523.5100.0 Non-impaired girls27.329.722.220.8100.0 Impaired girls43.224.118.414.3100.0Total23.429.122.425.1100.0

Table 5.

Cross tabulation, psycho-emotional well-being and class/impairment (n=8518).

Class/impairment status×psycho-emotional well-being cross tabulationPsycho-emotional well-beingVery low well-being (%)Low well-being (%)High well-being (%)Very high well-being (%)Total (%)High-class Non-impaired18.62823.829.6 Impaired25.527.321.825.5Middle-class Non-impaired20.62823.727.7 Impaired35.828.419.416.4Low-class Non-impaired24.130.822.522.7 Impaired42.926.612.517.9Total22.529.122.925.5100

Table 6.

Cross tabulation, social participation and impairment (n=9639).

Impairment status×social participation cross tabulation% within impairment statusSocial participationVery low social participation (%)Low social participation (%)High social participation (%)Very high social participation (%)Total (%)Impairment status Non-impaired26.027.722.423.9100.0 Impaired23.625.721.629.1100.0Total25.927.622.424.1100.0

Table 7.

Regression coefficients. Dependent: psycho-emotional well-being (n=7996).

Model summaryChange statisticsModelRR²Adjusted R²Std. error of the estimateR² changeF changedf1df2Significance of F change10.074^{^a}0.0050.0051.094270.00543.854179940.00020.158^{^b}0.0250.0251.083530.020160.208179930.00030.174^{^c}0.0300.0301.080630.00544.032179920.00040.195^{^d}0.0380.0381.076300.00865.377179910.000

a Predictors: (constant), impairment status.

b Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender.

c Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender, social class.

d Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender, social class, social participation.

Table 8.

Cross tabulation, social participation and impairment, respondents with low psycho-emotional well-being only (n=4151).

Impairment status×social participation cross tabulationPercentage within impairment statusSocial participationVery low social participation (%)Low social participation (%)High social participation (%)Very high social participation (%)Total (%)Impairment status Non-impaired21.428.024.825.9100.0 Impaired14.824.124.736.4100.0Total21.127.824.826.3100.0

Table 9.

Regression coefficients. Dependent: psycho-emotional well-being (n=7909).

Model summaryChange statisticsModelRR²Adjusted R²Standard error of the estimateR² changeF changedf1df2Significance of F change10.075^{^a}0.0060.0051.093880.00644.567179070.00020.159^{^b}0.0250.0251.083090.020159.344179060.00030.176^{^c}0.0310.0311.079940.00647.095179050.00040.197^{^d}0.0390.0381.075710.00863.310179040.00050.318^{^e}0.1010.1011.040120.063551.107179030.00060.331^{^f}0.1100.1091.035390.00873.499179020.000

a Predictors: (constant), impairment status.

b Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender.

c Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender, social class.

d Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender, social class, social participation.

e Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender, social class, social participation, bullying at school (or on the school route).

f Predictors: (constant), impairment status, gender, social class, social participation, bullying at school (or on the school route), violence?

Table 10.

Cross tabulation: gender/impairment and bullying (n=10,100).

Cross tabulationPercentage within gender/disability statusViolence?Not subjected to violence (%)Subjected to less severe violence (%)Subjected to severe violence (%)Subjected to violence that could need medical treatment (%)Subjected to violence of unknown severity (%)TotalGender/disability status Non-disabled boys62.615.812.05.83.9100.0 Disabled boys47.814.516.514.96.4100.0 Non-disabled girls78.210.17.02.62.0100.0 Disabled girls64.614.611.97.51.4100.0Total69.812.99.74.53.0100.0

Table 11.

Cross tabulation: gender/impairment and violence (n=10,100).

Cross tabulationPercentage within gender/impairment statusViolence?Not subjected to violence (%)Subjected to less severe violence (%)Subjected to severe violence (%)Subjected to violence that could need medical treatment (%)Subjected to violence of unknown severity (%)Total (%)Gender/impairment status Non-impaired boys62.615.812.05.83.9100.0 Impaired boys47.814.516.514.96.4100.0 Non-impaired girls78.210.17.02.62.0100.0 Impaired girls64.614.611.97.51.4100.0Total69.812.99.74.53.0100.0

Table 12.

Cross tabulation: impairment and close friendship (n =9998).

Impairment status×psycho-emotional well-being (close friends) cross tabulationPercentage within Impairment statusPsycho-emotional well-being (close friends)Very low well-being (%)Low well-being (%)High well-being (%)Very high well-being (%)Total (%)Impairment status Non-impaired24.121.528.326.1100.0 Impaired27.921.726.523.9100.0Total24.321.528.226.0100.0

References

Authors

Metrics

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2013.795911 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 211 - 228

Submitted on: Nov 5, 2012

Accepted on: Apr 2, 2013

Published on: May 3, 2014

Published by: Stockholm University Press