
Parental and professional agency in terminations for fetal anomalies: analysis of Finnish women's accounts
References
-
Act on the status and rights of patients N:o 785/1992
. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1992/en19920785.pdf -
Antaki
, C. , M. Billig , D. Edwards , and J. Potter . 2002 . Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytical shortcomings . Discourse Analysis Online 1 . -
Autti-Rämö
, I. , H. Koskinen , M. Mäkelä , A. Ritvanen , and P. Taipale . 2005 . Raskauden ajan ultraäänitutkimukset ja seerumiseulonnat rakenne- ja kromosomipoikkeavuuksien tunnistamisessa [Maternal ultrasound and serum screening in the detection of structural and chromosomal abnormalities] . FinOHTAn raportti 27 .Helsinki : STAKES . -
Anderson
, G. 1999. Nondirectiveness in prenatal genetics: Patients read between the lines. Nursing Ethics, 6( 2) : 126– 36. -
Beauchamp
, T.L.and Childress, J.F. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed, New York : Oxford University Press. -
Broberg
, G. , and N. Roll-Hansen . 1996 . Eugenics and the welfare state: Sterilization policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland .East Lansing , MI : Michigan State University Press . -
Bryar
, S.H. 1997. One day you're pregnant and one day you're not: Pregnancy interruption for fetal anomalies. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 26( 5) : 599– 66. -
Burck
, C. 2005. Comparing qualitative research methodologies for systemic research: The use of grounded theory, discourse analysis and narrative analysis. Journal of Family Therapy, 27( 5) : 237– 62. -
Emirbayer
, M.and Mische, A. 1998. What is agency?. The American Journal of Sociology, 103( 4) : 962– 1023. -
Fairclough
, N. 1992. Discourse and social change, Cambridge : Polity Press. -
Fuchs
, S. 2001. Beyond agency. Sociological Theory, 19( 1) : 24– 40. -
Garel
, M., Gosme-Seguret, S., Kaminski, M.and Cuttini, M. 2002. Ethical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: A qualitative survey among physicians and midwives. Prenatal Diagnosis, 22( 9) : 811– 17. -
Goverment decree on screenings 1339/2006
. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2006/en20061339.pdf -
Hakulinen
, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T.-R.and Alho, I. 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi [The Finnish Grammar], Helsinki : Finnish Literature Society. -
Halliday
, M.A.K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar, London : Arnold. -
Hall
, S., Abramsky, L.and Marteau, T. 2003. Health professionals' report of information given to parents following the prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome anomalies and outcomes of pregnancies: a pilot study. Prenatal Diagnosis, 23( 7) : 535– 8. -
Halonen
, M. 2008. “ Person reference as a device for constructing experiences as typical in group therapy” . In Conversation analysis and psychotherapy, Edited by: Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S.and Leudar, I. 139– 51. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. -
Hammersley
, M. 2003. Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: Methods or paradigms?. Discourse and Society, 14( 6) : 751– 81. -
Jallinoja
, P. 2001. Genetic screening in maternity care: Preventive aims and voluntary choices. Sociology of Health and Illness, 23( 3) : 286– 307. -
Jennings
, B. 2000. “ Technology and the genetic imaginary: Prenatal testing and the construction of disability” . In Prenatal testing and disability rights, Edited by: Parens, Erikand Asch, Adrienne. 124– 44. Washington , DC : Georgetown University Press. -
Korenromp
, M.J., Page-Christiaens, G.C.M.L., van den Bout, J., Mulder, E.J.H., Hunfeld, J.A.M., Bilardo, C.M., Offermans, J.P.M.and Visser, G.H.A. 2005. Long-term psychological consequences of pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality: A cross-sectional study. Prenatal Diagnosis, 25: 253– 60. -
Korenromp
, M. J., Page-Christiaens, G.C.M.L., van den Bout, J., Mulder, E.J.H., Potters, C.M.A.A., Erwich, J.J.H.M, van Binsbergen, C.J.M., Brons, J.T.J., Beekhuis, J.R., Omtzigt, A.W.J.and Visser, G.H.A. 2007. A prospective study on parental coping 4 months after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies. Prenatal Diagnosis, 27: 709– 16. -
Kurri
, K.and Wahlström, J. 2007. Reformulations of agentless talk in psychotherapy. Text and Talk, 27( 3) : 315– 38. -
Louhiala
, P. 2004. Preventing intellectual disability: Ethical and clinical issues, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. -
Mansfield
, C., Hopfer, S.and Marteau, T.M. 1999. Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down Syndrome, Spina bifida, Anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: A systematic literature review. Prenatal Diagnosis, 19( 9) : 808– 12. -
Mattila
, M. 1999. Kansamme parhaaksi: Rotuhygienia Suomessa vuoden 1935 sterilointilakiin asti [For our nation's best: Racial hygiene in Finland until the 1935 sterilization act], Helsinki : Suomen Historiallinen Seura. -
Medical research act No: 488/1999
. http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990488.pdf -
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
. 2007 . Seulontaohjelmat: Opas kunnille kansanterveystyöhön kuuluvien seulontojen järjestämisestä [Screening programmes: A handbook for municipal authorities] . Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön julkaisuja 2007:5 .Helsinki . -
Mykkänen
, J. 2010 . Isäksi tulon tarinat, tunteet ja toimijuus [Becoming a father – types of account, emotions and agency] . Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 382 .Jyväskylä : University of Jyväskylä . -
Pellegrino
, E.D.and Thomasma, D.C. 1993. The virtues in medical practice, New York : Oxford University Press. -
Press
, N. 2000. “ Assessing the expressive character of prenatal testing: The choices made or the choices made available?” . In Prenatal testing and disability rights, Edited by: Parens, Erikand Asch, Adrienne. 214– 33. Washington , DC : Georgetown University Press. -
Potter
, J.and Wetherell, M. 1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour, London : Sage. -
Santalahti
, P., Hemminki, E., Latikka, A.-M.and Ryynänen, M. 1998. Women's decision-making in prenatal screening. Social Science and Medicine, 46( 8) : 1067– 76. -
Saxton
, M. 2000. “ Why members of the disability community oppose prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion” . In Prenatal testing and disability rights, Edited by: Parens, Erikand Asch, Adrienne. 147– 64. Washington , DC : Georgetown University Press. -
Shakespeare
, T. 1998. Choices and rights: Eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Disability and Society, 13( 5) : 665– 81. -
Silverman
, D. 2005. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook, London : Sage. -
Thomas
, C. 2007. Sociologies of disability and illness: Contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology, Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan. -
Vehmas
, S. 2001. Just ignore it? Parents and genetic information. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 22( 5) : 473– 84. -
Wertz
, D.C.and Gregg, R. 2000. Genetics services in a social, ethical and policy context: A collaboration between consumers and providers. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26( 4) : 261– 5. -
Wetherell
, M. 2001. “ Debates in discourse research” . In Discourse theory and practice: A reader, Edited by: Wetherell, M., Taylor, S.and Yates, S.J. 380– 99. London : Sage. -
Williams
, C., Alderson, P.and Farsides, B. 2002. Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing. Social Science and Medicine, 54( 3) : 339– 47.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2012.660704 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 44
Submitted on: May 9, 2011
Accepted on: Dec 20, 2011
Published on: Mar 1, 2013
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2013 Katriina Koponen, Kaisa Laaksonen, Tanja Vehkakoski, Simo Vehmas, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.