The faces of intellectual disability. Philosophical reflections
References
-
Cox-White
, B.and Boxall, S.F.. Redefining disability: Maleficent, unjust and inconsistent. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33: 558– 76. -
Harris
, J.. Is there a coherent social conception of disability?. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26: 95– 100. -
Newell
, C.. The social nature of disability, disease and genetics: A response to Gillam, Persson, Holtug, Draper and Chadwick. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25: 172– 5. -
Paul
, D.B.. The politics of heredity essays on eugenics, biomedicine, and the nature-nurture debate, Albany : State University of New York Press. -
Priestley
, M.. Constructions and creations: idealism, materialism and disability theory. Disability & Society, 13: 75– 94. -
Reindal
, S.M.. Disability, gene therapy and eugenics-a challenge to John Harris. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26: 89– 94. -
Richards
, J.R.. How not to end disability. San Diego Law Review, 39: 693– 713. -
Singer
, P.. Animal liberation, London : Pimlico.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2011.558242 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 347 - 349
Published on: May 4, 2011
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2011 Solveig Magnus Reindal, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.