References
-
Abberley
, P. 2002. “ Work, disability, disabled people and European social theory” . In Disability studies today, Edited by: Barnes, C., Oliver, M.and Barton, L. 120– 38. Cambridge : Polity. -
Acker
, J. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4( 2) : 139– 58. -
Allen
, C., Milner, J.and Price, D. 2002. Home is where the start is: The housing and urban experiences of visually impaired children, New York : Joseph Rowntree Foundation. -
Alvesson
, M.and Wilmott, H. 2002. Identity regulation as organizational control: Producin the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39( 5) : 619– 44. -
Balsamo
, A. 1996. Technologies of the gendered body, Durham , NC : Duke University Press. -
Barnes
, C. 1991. Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: A case for anti-discrimination legislation, London : Hurst and Co. in association with the British Council of Organisations of Disabled People. -
Barnes
, C.and Mercer, G. 2005. Disability, work, and welfare: Challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work. Employment & Society, 19( 3) : 527– 45. -
Bordo
, S. 1993. Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body, Berkeley , CA : University of California Press. -
Bourdieu
, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge , , UK: Cambridge University Press. -
Bourdieu
, P. 1990. The logic of ractice, Stanford : Stanford University Press. -
Brisenden
, S. 1986. Independent living and the medical model of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1: 173– 8. -
Buchholz
, L. 2006. Bringing the body back into theory and methodology. Theory and Society, 35( 4) : 481– 90. -
Burrell
, G. 1984. Sex and organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 5( 2) : 97– 118. -
Casey
, C. 2000. “ Sociology sensing the body: Revitalizing a dissociative discourse” . In Body and organization, Edited by: Hassard, J., Holliday, R.and Willmott, H. 52– 70. London : Sage. -
Colella
, A. 2001. Co-worker distributive fairness judgments of the workplace accommodation of employees with disabilities. Academy of Management Review, 26( 1) : 100– 16. -
Cregan
, K. 2006. The sociology of the body: Mapping the abstraction of embodiment, London : Sage. -
Creswell
, J.W. 1994. Research design, Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage. -
Dale
, K. 2001. Anatomising embodiment and organization theory, Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan. -
Dale
, K.and Burrell, G. 2008. The spaces of organisation & the organisation of space, Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan. -
Dreyfus
, L.H. 1996 . The current relevance of Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of embodiment . The Electronic Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 . http://ejap.louisiana.edu/EJAP/1996.spring/dreyfus.1996.spring.html . -
Durkheim
, E. 1971 . Individualism and the intellectuals . Trans S. Lukes and J. Lukes . Political Studies XVII : 14 – 30 . -
Engelsrud
, G. 2005. The lived body as experience and perspective: Methodological challenges. Qualitative Research, 5: 267– 84. -
Ezzy
, D. 2002. Qualitative analysis. Practice and innovation, London : Routledge. -
Foster
, D. 2007. Legal obligation or personal lottery? Employee experiences of disability and the negotiation of adjustments in the public sector workplace. Work, Employment & Society, 21( 1) : 67– 84. -
Foucault
, M. 1979. Discipline and punish, New York : Vintage Books. -
Gleeson
, B. 1999. Geographies of disability, London : Routledge. -
Goffman
, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life, New York : Doubleday. -
Grant
, A.M., Christianson, M.K.and Price, R.H. 2007. Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21( 3) : 51– 63. -
Grover
, C.and Piggott, L. 2005. Disabled people, the reserve army of labour and welfare reform. Disability and Society, 20( 7) : 705– 17. -
Hassard
, J., Holliday, R.and Willmott, H. 2000. “ Introduction to body and organization” . In Body and organization, Edited by: Hassard, J., Holliday, R.and Willmott, H. 1– 14. London : Sage. -
Heaphy
, E.D.and Dutton, J.E. 2008. Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology. Academy of Management Review, 33( 1) : 137– 62. -
Hindmarsh
, J.and Pilnick, A. 2007. Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organization Studies, 28( 9) : 1395– 416. -
Hogan
, G. 2003. The inclusive corporation: A disability handbook for business professionals, Athens , Ohio : Swallow Press/Ohio University Press. -
Hughes
, B. 1999. The constitution of impairment: Modernity and the aesthetic of oppression. Disability and Society, 14( 2) : 155– 72. -
Hughes
, B.and Paterson, K. 1997. The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12( 3) : 325– 40. -
Husserl
, E. 2001. Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic, Dordrecht : Kluwer. -
Imrie
, R. 2004. Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home. Housing Studies, 19( 5) : 745– 63. -
Jones
, G.E. 1997. Advancement opportunities issues for persons with disabilities. Human Resource Management Review, 7( 1) : 55– 76. -
Knights
, D.and Thanem, T. 2005. “ Embodying emotional labour” . In Gender, bodies and work, Edited by: Morgan, D.H.J, Brandth, B.and Kvande, E. 31– 43. Hampshire , , UK: Ashgate. -
McCracken
, G. 1988. The long interview, Newbury Park , CA : Sage. -
McFarlin
, D.B., Song, J.and Sonntag, M. 1991. Integrating the disabled into the workforce: A survey of Fortune 500 company attitudes and practices. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4( 2) : 107– 22. -
Merleau-Ponty
, M. 1962. The phenomenology of perception, London : Routledge and Kegan Paul. -
Merleau-Ponty
, M. 1962. The visible and the invisible, Evanston : Northwestern University Press. -
Merleau-Ponty
, M. 1965 . The structure of behavior . Trans. A. Fisher .London : Methuen . -
Miles
, M.B.and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis, Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage. -
Munkejord
, K. 2009. Methodological emotional reflexivity. The role of researcher emotions in grounded theory research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 4( 2) : 151– 67. -
Oliver
, M. 1990. The politics of disablement, London : Macmillan. -
Oliver
, M. 1996. Understanding disability: From theory to practice, London : Macmillan. -
Oliver
, M.and Barnes, C. 1998. Disabled people and social policy: From exclusion to inclusion, London : Longman. -
Schatzki
, T.R. 2001. “ Introduction: Practice theory” . In The practice turn in contemporary theory, Edited by: Schatzki, T.R., Knorr Cetina, K.and von Savigny, E.London : Routledge. -
Shakespeare
, T.and Watson, N. 2002. The social model of disability: An outdated ideology?. Research in Social Science and Disability, 2: 9– 28. -
Shilling
, C. 2005. The body in culture, technology and society, London : Sage. -
Stone
, D.and Colella, A. 1996. A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21( 2) : 352– 401. -
Strauss
, A.and Corbin, J. 1994. “ Grounded theory methodology: An overview” . In Handbook of qualitative research, Edited by: Denzin, N.K.and Lincoln, Y.S. 273– 85. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage. -
Taylor
, C. 1995. Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers 2, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. -
Thanem
, T. 2008. Embodying disability in diversity management research. Equal Opportunities International, 27( 7) : 581– 95. -
Thomas
, C. 2004. How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society, 19( 6) : 569– 83. -
Trethewey
, A. 1999. Disciplined bodies: Women's embodied identities at work. Organization Studies, 20( 3) : 423– 50. -
Turner
, B. 1996 . Body and society ( 2nd ed. First publ. 1984 ).London : Sage . -
Von Eckartsberg
, R. 1998. “ Existential-phenomenological research” . In Phenomenological inquiry in psychology: Existential and transpersonal dimensions, Edited by: Valle, R. 21– 62. New York : Plenum Press. -
Wacquant
, L. 2005. Carnal connections: On embodiment, apprenticeship, and membership. Qualitative Sociology, 28: 445– 74. -
Woodhams
, C.and Danieli, A. 2000. Disability and diversity – a difference too far?. Personnel Review, 29( 3) : 402– 16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2011.558223 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 148 - 164
Submitted on: Mar 19, 2010
Accepted on: Nov 23, 2010
Published on: May 2, 2012
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2012 Sara Värlander, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
