Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Prospective Memory, Working Memory, Retrospective Memory and Self-Rated Memory Performance in Persons with Intellectual Disability Cover

Prospective Memory, Working Memory, Retrospective Memory and Self-Rated Memory Performance in Persons with Intellectual Disability

Open Access
|Aug 2008

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

 Group performances on prospective memory, working and long-term memory tasks and conceptual knowledge and ratings

With intellectual disabilityWithout intellectual disabilityTasknm (SD)Vs. min*Vs. max**rangenm (SD)Vs. min*Vs. max**rangetProspective MemoryRemind-Me (number of reminders)180.22 (0.55)1.72−52.40 − 2144.64 (1.95)8.93−4.531 − 78.25†,‡Picture-Based PM343.31 (1.39)13.92−7.100–5144.93 (0.15)120.68−1.754.5–56.70†,‡Mean Recognition Picture-Based PM338.61(1.86)26.571.154–101410 (0.00)—§§10 − 104.28†,‡d' Picture-Based PM 332.39 (1.25)10.98−8.92−0.36–4.34134.13 (0.31)47.78−2.383.48–4.347.41†,‡Posted Letter180.83 (0.38)9.22−1.840–1180.83 (0.38)9.22−1.840–10.00Working memory and retrospective memoryListening Span2017.35 (7.88)9.85−14.004–351830.72 (3.68)35.47−13.0324–366.81†,‡Semantic Decisions of Listening Span2039.50 (2.54)32.52−4.3935–421741.88 (0.33)259.26−1.4641–424.15†,‡Digit Span2223.41 (17.79)6.17−25.733–671774 (18.62)16.39−10.4550–1258.58†,‡Picture Span2319.26 (14.80)6.24−20.014–671864.56 (12.78)21.47−5.4728–8010.32Subject performed tasks2110.71 (6.02)8.16−28.390–291823.67 (5.09)19.74−20.2918–377.19 Ratings and time conceptionTime conception229.64 (2.67)16.96 (6.40†,††)−4.164–12——Self–rated PM3017.43 (2.96)17.48−12.179–221618.00 (1.67)23.91−14.1016–230.83Self-rated retrospective memory3118.03 (2.93)19.09−11.3512–231619.19 (1.97)22.67−9.7516–231.42Staff ratings1930.42 (5.36)19.06−15.1216–35——*One-tailed t-test versus the theoretical minimum performance**One-tailed t-test versus the theoretical maximum performancep  <  0.05Equal variance not assumed (significant result on Levene's test for equality in variance)§Not computed (0 variance)0 in a cell adjusted to 0.5††One-tailed t-test versus the theoretical mean performance
Table 2.

 Correlations* in bold text for the intellectual disability group and plain text for the control group

TasksTasks1 rS (n)2 rS (n)3 rS (n)4 rS (n)5 rS (n)6 rS (n)7 rS (n)8 rS (n)9 rS (n)1. Remind-Me (number of reminders)1.00 (18)0.14(13)0.43 (14)0.10 (14)−0.16 (13)−0.38 (14)0.15 (13)−0.12 (14)2. Picture-Based PM **0.15 (18)1.00 (33)(13)0.35 (13)0.41 (13)0.01 (12)0.07 (13)−0.21 (12)−0.20 (13)3. Recognition of PM cues0.20 (18)0.37 (33)1.00 (33)4. Post-a-Letter(10)0.13 (18)0.22 (18)1.00 (18)−0.19 (18)−0.06 (17)0.09 (18)0.31 (17)0.07 (18)5. Listening Span0.06 (12)0.54 (20)0.14 (20)0.00 (14)1.00 (20)0.10 (18)0.44 (18)−0.13 (17)−0.24 (18)6. Digit Span0.07 (14)0.51 (22)0.59 (22)0.23 (15)0.57 (17)1.00 (22)−0.07 (17)−0.45 (16)0.34 (17)7. Picture Span−0.14 (14)0.53 (23)0.30 (23)0.00 (14)0.40 (17)0.69 (20)1.00 (23)0.13 (17)0.11 (18)8. Semantic decisions of Listening Span−0.08 (12)0.32 (20)0.12 (20)0.46 (14)0.33 (20)0.57 (17)0.34 (17)1.00 (20)0.00 (17)9. Subject performed tasks0.11 (13)0.34 (21)0.37 (21)0.16 (15)0.48 (17)0.56 (20)0.32 (19)0.06 (17)1.00 (21)*Spearman's rho**d'Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Language: English
Page range: 147 - 165
Published on: Aug 3, 2008
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2008 Anna Levén, Björn Lyxell, Jan Andersson, Henrik Danielsson, Jerker Rönnberg, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.