Staff's Collaborative Work Process with an Adolescent Boy with Autism and Intellectual Disability in Community-based Sheltered Housing

DiaryIndividual interviewsFocus group interviewsFirst setFollow upBipolar categories Positiveyesyesnono NegativeyesnoyesyesPedagogical strategies Successful strategiesyesyesnono Unsuccessful strategiesyesnoyesyes

Model showing how the staff's use of different pedagogical strategies was connected to the three bipolar categories describing the working process and showing the pedagogical goals, conditions, expectations and changes over time during the whole period.

Table 2.

Gradual shifts of proportions of statements within categories in the diary in relation to time periods.

Positive (+) Negative (−)CategoriesYear 0–1Year 1–2Year 2–3.5*Bipolar categories+Optimism873243−Resignation235246+Trust38713−Mistrust294356+Structure1123239−Lack of Structure314037Pedagogical strategiesWithdrawal311922SuccessfulClarification533726Repeated instruction282119Demand231714UnsuccessfulPunishment71513Threat0815*The last period, Year 2–3.5, is six months longer than the other periods.

References

Authors

Metrics

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410701547184 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 49 - 66

Published on: Mar 1, 2008

Published by: Stockholm University Press

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2008 Marie Hübel, Karin Linder, Bengt Sivberg, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 10 (2008): Issue 1

Staff's Collaborative Work Process with an Adolescent Boy with Autism and Intellectual Disability in Community-based Sheltered Housing

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Concordance between different types of data (diary, individual and focus group interviews) over time by presence of units of meanings assigned to categories (yes = ≥ 80% of statements assigned to demanded categories, no = ≤ 20% of statements assigned to demanded categories)

Figure 1.

Table 2.

Gradual shifts of proportions of statements within categories in the diary in relation to time periods.

Paradigm

My account