Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The use of theatre in medical education in the emergency cases school: an appealing and widely accessible way of learning Cover

The use of theatre in medical education in the emergency cases school: an appealing and widely accessible way of learning

Open Access
|Apr 2017

Figures & Tables

Table 1

The topics of the scenarios of the Emergency Cases School

Scenario

System

Differential diagnosis

Final diagnosis

Actors, including the academic tutors (total number)

1

Gastrointestinal

Peptic ulcer disease

Myocardial infarction

Cholecystitis

Gastric cancer

Oesophagitis

Acute pancreatitis

4

2

Cardiovascular

Acute aortic dissection

Acute pericarditis

Pulmonary embolism

Infective endocarditis

Myocardial infarction

4

3

Cardiovascular

Deep venous thrombosis

Vasculitis

Vasospasm

Peripheral vascular injury

Acute lower limb ischaemia

3

4

Nervous

Subdural/epidural/endocranial haematoma

Migraine

Meningitis, encephalitis

Transient ischaemic attack

Subarachnoid haemorrhage

4

5

Urinary

Obstructive blood clot in the ureter

Renal vein thrombosis

Biliary colic

Appendicitis

Ureter carcinoma

Ureterolithiasis

3

6

Gastrointestinal

Acute cholangitis

Acute pancreatitis

Acute gastritis

Inflammatory bowel disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Duodenal ulcer

4

7

Nervous

Seizure

Systemic infection

Brain tumour

Metabolic disorders

Vertigo

Cerebrovascular accident

4

8

Pulmonary

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

Pneumonia

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Pulmonary embolism

Myocardial infarction

Under tension pneumothorax

3

9

Nervous

Multiple sclerosis

Neoplasms of the spinal cord

Diabetic neuropathy

Cauda equina syndrome

4

Table 2

Results of the DREEM inventory

(Subscale) Question

Mean score (SD)

Score category (category limits)

Students’ perceptions of learning (SPL)

33.11 (6.55)

‘A more positive perception’ (25–36)

Students’ perceptions of teachers (SPT)

31.68 (6.48)

‘Moving in the right direction’ (23–33)

Students’ academic self-perceptions (SASP)

21.32 (4.3)

‘Feeling more on the positive side’ (17–24)

Students’ perceptions of atmosphere (SPA)

34.97 (6.43)

‘A more positive atmosphere’ (25–36)

Students’ social self-perceptions (SSSP)

19.23 (3.64)

‘Not too bad’ (15–21)

Overall score

140.32 (23.39)

‘More positive than negative’ (101–150)

Q1. Do you think that the course will prove itself beneficial to your clinical skills?

3.07 (0.78)

Q2. Would you suggest the course to another student?

3.65 (0.61)

Q1 Extra Question 1, Q2 Extra Question 2

The limits of Q1 and Q2 scores were 0 (for minimum) and 4 (for maximum). The maximum score for SPL, SPT, SASP, SPA, SSSP and overall is 48, 44, 32, 48, 28 and 200, respectively

Language: English
Published on: Apr 12, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Christodoulos Keskinis, Vasileios Bafitis, Panagiota Karailidou, Christina Pagonidou, Panteleimon Pantelidis, Alexandros Rampotas, Michail Sideris, Georgios Tsoulfas, Dimitrios Stakos, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.