Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Addressing the theory-practice gap in assessment Cover

Addressing the theory-practice gap in assessment

By: Sarah R. Wright and  Matt Homer  
Open Access
|Jan 2017

References

  1. Young M, Cummings BA, St-Onge C. Ensuring the quality of multiple-choice exams administered to small cohorts: a cautionary tale. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6.
  2. Cizek GJ Bunch MB Standard Setting: a guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests 2007 Thousand Oaks SAGE 10.4135/9781412985918
  3. Homer M Darling JC Setting standards in knowledge assessments: comparing Ebel and Cohen vis Rasch Med Teach 2016 38 1267 1277 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1230184
  4. Mckinley DW Norcini JJ How to set standards on performance-based examinations: AMEE Guide No. 85 Med Teach 2014 36 97 110 10.3109/0142159X.2013.853119
  5. Pell G Roberts TE Setting standards for student assessment Int J Res Meth Educ 2006 29 91 103 10.1080/01406720500537486
  6. Albert M Hodges B Regehr G Research in medical education: balancing service and science Adv Health Sci Educ 2007 12 103 115 10.1007/s10459-006-9026-2
  7. Schuwirth LW Van der Vleuten CPM General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57 Med Teach 2011 33 783 797 10.3109/0142159X.2011.611022
  8. Schuwirth LW Van der Vleuten CPM Programmatic assessment and Kane’s validity perspective Med Educ 2012 46 38 48 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04098.x
  9. Medical Council of Canada Guidelines for the development of multiple-choice questions 2010 Ottawa Medical Council of Canada
  10. Pell G Fuller R Homer M Roberts T How to measure the quality of the OSCE: A review of metrics – AMEE guide no. 49 Med Teach 2010 32 802 811 10.3109/0142159X.2010.507716
Language: English
Published on: Jan 3, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Sarah R. Wright, Matt Homer, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.