References
-
1.
Spierenburg E. Eerste aanzet model voor klinisch redeneren in termen van onderliggende strategieën en benodigde kennis. Intern document Erasmus MC. 2007.
-
2.
de Vries AC Custers EJFM ten Cate ThJ Leren klinisch redeneren en het ontwikkelen van ziektescripts: mogelijkheden in het medisch onderwijs Tijdschr Med Onderwijs. 2006 25 1 3 13 10.1007/BF03056709
-
3.
Eva KW What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning Med Educ 2005 39 98 106 15612906 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01972.x
-
4.
Kassirer JP Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached Acad Med 2010 85 7 1118 1124 20603909 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d5dd0d
-
5.
Beullens J Struyf E Van Damme B Do extended matching multiple-choice questions measure clinical reasoning? Med Educ 2005 39 410 417 15813764 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02089.x
-
6.
Dochy F Nickmans G Competentiegericht opleiden en toetsen. Theorie en praktijk van flexibel leren 2005 Utrecht Lemma BV
-
7.
Sibert L Darmoni SJ Dahamna B Hellot MF Weber J Charlin B Online clinical reasoning assessment with Script Concordance test in urology: results of a French pilot study BMC Med Educ 2006 28 1 9
-
8.
Schuwirth LWT van der Vleuten CPM Different written assessment methods: what can be said about their strengths and weaknesses? Med Educ 2004 38 974 979 15327679 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01916.x
-
9.
Rothoff T Baehring T Dicken HD Fahron U Richter MR Scherbaum WA Comparison between Long-Menu en Open-ended questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial BMC Med Educ 2006 6 1 9 10.1186/1472-6920-6-50
-
10.
Schuwirth LWT van der Vleuten CPM Written assessment. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine Br Med J 2003 326 643 645 10.1136/bmj.326.7390.643
-
11.
Case SM Swanson DB Extended-matching items: a practical alternative to free-response questions Teach Learn Med 1993 5 2 107 115 10.1080/10401339309539601
-
12.
Carriere B Gagnon R Charlin B Downing S Bordage G Assessing clinical reasoning in pediatric emergency medicine: validity evidence for a script concordance test Ann Emerg Med 2009 53 5 647 652 18722694 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.024
-
13.
Fournier JP Demeester A Charlin B Script Concordance Tests: guidelines for construction BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008 6 8 18
-
14.
Goulet F Jacques A Gagnon R Charlin B Shabah A Poorly performing physicians: does the Script Concordance Test detect Bad clinical reasoning? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 30 3 161 166 20872770 10.1002/chp.20076
-
15.
Lambert C Gagnon R Nguyen D Charlin B The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning Radiat Oncol. 2009 4 7 1 6
-
16.
Park AJ Barber MD Bent AE Assessment of intraoperative judgment during gynecologic surgery using the Script Concordance Test Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010 3 240.e1 240 e6 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.010
-
17.
Beullens J van Damme B Jaspaert H Janssen PJ Are extended-matching multiple-choice items appropriate for a final test in medical education? Med Teach 2002 24 4 390 395 12193322 10.1080/0142159021000000843
-
18.
Bhakta B Tennant A Horton M Lawton G Andrich D Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical education BMC Med Educ 2005 5 9 15752421 10.1186/1472-6920-5-9
-
19.
Coderre SP Harasym P Mandin H Fick G The impact of two multiple-choice question formats on the problem-solving strategies used by novices and experts BMC Med Educ 2004 4 23 1 9
-
20.
Samuels A Extended Matching Questions and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists written examination: an overview Australas Psychiatry. 2006 14 1 63 66 16630201
-
21.
Ber R The CIP (comprehensive integrative puzzle) assessment method Med Teach 2003 25 171 176 12745526 10.1080/0142159031000092571
-
22.
Groothoff JW Frenkel J Tytgat GA Vreede WB Bosman DK ten Cate Th J Growth of analytical thinking skills over time as measured with the MATCH test Med Educ 2008 42 10 1037 1043 18823523 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03152.x
-
23.
Modified Essay Questions. Retrieved February 15, 2011. http://www.icgp.ie/go/become_a_gp/micgp_examination/past_papers/modified_essayquestion_meq_.
-
24.
Palmer EJ Devitt PG Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple-choice questions? BMC Med Educ 2007 7 49 1 7
-
25.
Rademakers JJDJM ten Cate ThJ Bär PR Progress testing with short answer questions Med Teach 2005 27 578 582 16332547 10.1080/01421590500062749 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnltF2guw%3D%3D
-
26.
Case SM Swanson DB Ripkey DR Multiple-choice question strategies. Comparison of items in five-option and extended-matching formats for assessment of diagnostic skills Acad Med 1994 69 10 1 3 10.1097/00001888-199410000-00023
-
27.
Schuwirth LWT van Berkel H Bax A Toetsen met korte casussen Toetsen in het hoger onderwijs (127–143) 2006 Houten Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
-
28.
Kelly S Dennick R Evidence of gender bias in True-False-Abstain medical examinations BMC Med Educ. 2009 9 32 19500414 10.1186/1472-6920-9-32
-
29.
Pamphlett R It takes only 100 true-false items to test medical students: true or false? Med Teach 2005 27 468 472 16147803 10.1080/01421590500097018
-
30.
Cook DA Triola MM Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps Med Educ 2009 43 4 303 311 19335571 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03286.x
-
31.
Gesundheit N Brutlag P Youngblood P Gunning WT Zary N Fors U The use of virtual patients to assess the clinical skills and reasoning of medical students: initial insights on student acceptance Med Teach 2009 31 8 739 742 19811211 10.1080/01421590903126489
-
32.
Waldmann UM Gulich MS Zeitler HP Virtual Patients for assessing medical students—important aspects when considering the introduction of a new assessment format Med Teach 2008 30 1 17 24 18278646 10.1080/01421590701758616
