Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Artist, the Philosopher, and the Nazi: One Possible Meaning Behind the Mischievous Banality of the Banality of Evil Cover

The Artist, the Philosopher, and the Nazi: One Possible Meaning Behind the Mischievous Banality of the Banality of Evil

By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2014

Abstract

This article examines the painting “The Banality of the Banality of Evil” by graffiti artist, Banksy. I argue that his painting represents a current cultural phenomenon, the banality of the banality of evil, which takes Hannah Arendt’s notion of the banality of evil to a different meaning. I argue that the painting represents not only the Nazi’s, in this case Eichmann, unwillingness to confront his crimes, but people’s unwillingness to engage in political debate without confronting the significance and exclusivity of Nazism. Furthermore, I argue that instead of the banality of the Nazi as an ordinary man committing horrendous act, the increasing use of the accusation of ‘being a Nazi’ presents Nazism as the cliché and banal subject.
Journal eISSN: 2162-8793
Language: English
Published on: Sep 1, 2014
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2014 Richard Curtis, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.