Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Deference to the Rulemaker, Not to the Rule: The D.C. Circuit’s Enabling Rejection of the SEC’s Fixed Indexed Annuities Rule in American Equity Investment Life Insurance Co. v. SEC Cover

Deference to the Rulemaker, Not to the Rule: The D.C. Circuit’s Enabling Rejection of the SEC’s Fixed Indexed Annuities Rule in American Equity Investment Life Insurance Co. v. SEC

Open Access
|Apr 2011

Abstract

On July 12, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in American Equity Investment Life Insurance Co. v. SEC, vacated the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Rule 151A due to flaws in the SEC’s cost-benefit analysis. Rule 151A aimed to expand the SEC’s oversight to include purportedly “risky” hybrid annuity products—known as fixed indexed annuities—currently regulated by state insurance commissioners. In vacating the rule, however, the court actually embraced an expansive view of a federal agency’s authority to regulate in an area historically reserved to the states. This Comment argues that courts should avoid such broad deference when evaluating federal agency rules that threaten to encroach upon an area presumptively occupied by state regulation.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 197 - 212
Published on: Apr 1, 2011
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2011 Sebastian Waisman, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.