Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Incommensurable Uses: RLUIPA’s Equal Terms Provision and Exclusionary Zoning in River of Life Kingdom Ministries v. Village of Hazel Crest Cover

Incommensurable Uses: RLUIPA’s Equal Terms Provision and Exclusionary Zoning in River of Life Kingdom Ministries v. Village of Hazel Crest

Open Access
|Apr 2011

Abstract

On July 2, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in River of Life Kingdom Ministries v. Village of Hazel Crest held that the “equal terms” provision of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act requires a comparison of religious and secular land uses with respect to an accepted zoning criteria. In so doing, the Seventh Circuit confronted a circuit split in the application of the equal terms provision and carved out a compromise between competing concerns about control over land-use regulations. This Comment discusses the difficulty of equal treatment within the context of exclusionary zoning and argues that River of Life puts control over zoning regulations into the courts and out of the hands of religious institutions.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 71 - 82
Published on: Apr 1, 2011
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2011 Tokufumi J. Noda, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.