Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Let’s Make it a True Daily Double (Jeopardy): How James Harrison was Acquitted of the Death Penalty Only to Face it Again Cover

Let’s Make it a True Daily Double (Jeopardy): How James Harrison was Acquitted of the Death Penalty Only to Face it Again

Open Access
|Apr 2012

Abstract

On May 10, 2011, in Harrison v. Gillespie, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that defendants do not have a per se constitutional right to poll the jury before a trial judge declares a mistrial. Further, the court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not preclude a court from considering the death penalty as a potential sentence on retrial. This Comment argues, however, that in doing so, the court made it more likely that capital defendants will receive the death penalty, because a fresh jury may impose the death penalty, even though the previously discharged jury merely deadlocked over which lesser included punishment to impose.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 147 - 158
Published on: Apr 20, 2012
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Tyler Z. Bernstein, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.