Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Shifting Targets on Shifting Fees: Attorney’s Fees in the Wake of Singer Management Consultants, Inc. v. Milgram Cover

Shifting Targets on Shifting Fees: Attorney’s Fees in the Wake of Singer Management Consultants, Inc. v. Milgram

Open Access
|Mar 2012

Abstract

On June 15, 2011, in Singer Management Consultants, Inc. v. Milgram, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit sitting en banc held that a temporary restraining order vacated after a defendant’s change in position is insufficient to confer prevailing-party status for purposes of awarding attorney’s fees. As a result, parties who obtain in-court relief short of a formal court order may not be able to obtain attorney’s fees. This Comment argues that in arriving at that decision, the Singer court too narrowly construed the phrase “judicially sanctioned.” It further advises that, to avoid this result, attorneys who plan to seek fees should request a permanent formal order, which courts have recognized as sufficient to confer prevailing-party status.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 807 - 820
Published on: Mar 1, 2012
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Kimberley P. Ver Ploeg, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.