Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hey! That’s My Valor: The Stolen Valor Act and Government Regulation of False Speech Under the First Amendment Cover

Hey! That’s My Valor: The Stolen Valor Act and Government Regulation of False Speech Under the First Amendment

By:   
Open Access
|Mar 2012

Abstract

The Stolen Valor Act criminalizes lies about receiving military decorations. Through the Stolen Valor Act, the government seeks to protect the honor associated with receiving a military decoration from people who falsely claim to have received one. Some courts have held that the false statements proscribed by the Stolen Valor Act fall outside of First Amendment protection. Other courts, most notably the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in the 2010 decision United States v. Alvarez, held that lies about military decorations are protected speech and that the Stolen Valor Act is unconstitutional because it does not meet strict scrutiny. This Note argues that the First Amendment protects false statements. Section 704(b) of the Stolen Valor Act does not fall into any category of unprotected speech, does not meet the strict scrutiny test for government regulation of protected speech, and therefore is an unconstitutional restriction of protected speech.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 775 - 806
Published on: Mar 1, 2012
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Kathryn Smith, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.