Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Three Strikes and You’re Out ... Maybe: “Violent Felonies” and the Armed Career Criminal Act in United States v. Vann Cover

Three Strikes and You’re Out ... Maybe: “Violent Felonies” and the Armed Career Criminal Act in United States v. Vann

By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2013

Abstract

On October 11, 2011, in United States v. Vann, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that Torrell Vann’s three prior indecent liberties convictions were not violent felonies under the federal Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). In so doing, the per curiam majority attempted to interpret the vague residual clause of the ACCA and concluded that taking improper liberties or committing lewd acts on the body of a child were not the type of convictions worthy of the fifteen-year mandatory minimum prison sentence mandated by the ACCA. This Comment argues that the time has come for Congress to amend the ACCA or for the U.S. Supreme Court to declare it void for vagueness, because an individual’s liberty cannot rest upon ad hoc judicial conjectures.

Journal eISSN: 1930-661X
Language: English
Page range: 201 - 216
Published on: Apr 22, 2013
Published by: Boston College Law School
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2013 Nick Poli, published by Boston College Law School
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.